The Model and Its Solution

As in the simplest Langmuir model we start with M independent, identical and, for simplicity, localized sites. As we have seen in section 2.9, a factor of M is introduced in the case of free adsorbent molecules, but this will have no effect on the properties in which we are interested in this section. Also, the polymer is assumed to be large compared with the ligands so that changes in mass or in moment of inertia caused by adsorption can be neglected. Each site can adsorb only one ligand, which we assume to be a simple gas molecule G. 

The new feature of the present model is that each site or polymer can be in one of two states, low energy (L) or high energy (//). These two states are in chemical equilibrium 

The adsorbed molecule G has different adsorption energies Ul and Uh, according to whether it is adsorbed on the L or the H form. The L and H forms can be thought of as two conformations of a polymer, which we symbolically denote by a square and a circle. 

Thus the generalization of the simple Langmuir model applies to the two assumptions made in the introduction to section 2.8. First, there are two adsorption parameters Ul and Uh instead of one. Second, the process of adsorption might perturb the sites, in the sense that the equilibrium composition of L and H is in general affected by the adsorption of G. 

In order to minimize the parameters needed to describe the model, we assume that L and H are characterized only by their energy levels El and Eh (with El Eh) The PFs of a site in either state, Ql and Qh, are given by 

---

The real problem is, of course, the determination of and correlations between process data as input for the model and its solutions. Such expressions are different for each situation, i.e. they depend on feed material and binder characteristics, equipment design and operation, process variations, final product properties, and many more. Data that can serve as input for the model equations must be obtained experimentally. Since access to commercial, often restricted or large scale operations is not available or possible, typically the determination of data and their correlation is based on model experiments. In addition to the difference in size and operation between the laboratory model and the real system, the gathering of data is interrupting and critically changing the process. 

In this phase the problem is defined and the important elements that pertain to the problem and its solution are identified. The degree of accuracy needed in the model and the model s potential uses must be determined. To evaluate the structure and complexity of the model, ascertain... 

This specifies the model, and it is well at this point to look back at the assumptions that have been made. They are (1) the immobility of the algae, which cuts out convective and diffusive terms, and (2,3) the validity of the growth and Beer s laws. No mention need be made of the depth of the pond if the immobility is conceded, for the solution for infinite depth is simply truncated at the finite depth. How adequate the model is depends on its purpose. For the present purpose of illustrating model building, it is admirable for predicting the total growth, it may be less accurate and, for the details of distribution, still less. The latter purposes will demand a comparison with experiment, but since we are concerned with the first we can proceed with equanimity. 

In the chemical applications of this model the problem and its solutions are imbedded into a suitable FIEM. For instance, in bilateral synthesis design the EMb(A) of the starting materials and the target EMe(A), i.e. the target molecule and its coproducts, correspond to the fee-points P(B) and P(E), and the pathways that connect P(B) with P(E) via the fee-points of intermediate EMs are the conceivable syntheses. The solutions of such chemical problems are found by solving the fundamental equation... 

Systems Where Radical Desorption is Negligible. Styrene and methyl methacrylate emulsion polymerization are examples of systems where radical desorption can be neglected. In Figures 4 and 5 are shown comparisons between experimental and theoretical conversion histories in methyl methacrylate and styrene polymerization. The solid curves represent the model, and it appears that there is excellent agreement between theory and experiment. The values of the rate constants used for the theoretical simulations are reported in previous publications (, 3). The dashed curves represent the corresponding theoretical curves in the calculation of which gel-effect has been neglected, that is, ktp is kept constant at a value for low viscosity solutions. It appears that neglecting gel-effect in the simulation of styrene... 

The fact that the same model can be applied equally well to crystals as well as to solutions is not something superficial. In our opinion, this provides additional evidence that the short-range order in atomic arrangements conforms to the same laws in both crystals and complexes existing in solutions. The successful application of crystal-structure-based values of electron-donor characteristics of ligands to the problems of complex formation (choice of coordination number, sequence and direction of replacement reactions, etc.) is most probably owing to the adequate character of the model and its description of the chemical interactions. 

Before going on to something as complex as an atom, let s look at a model problem in some detail. The first one is the one-dimensional particle-in-a-box problem. This turns out to be an excellent conceptual model for conjugated dye molecules (see Chapter 21) and also a model for trapped charged particles. The problem and its solutions are similar to the vibrating string just discussed. The potential term is shown graphically and mathematically in Fig. 7.1. 

Finally, we note that the solution of the general rate model for a multicomponent mixture can be applied simply to the single component case by choosing 1 as the number of components. Thus, the general rate model and its solution are discussed in the next chapter to avoid repetitive discussions. 

In what follows the fundamentals of the Gaussian model and its solution for several specific situations are presented. We consider the control volume shown in Fig. 10.25 through which a mixture of released gas and air is supposed to flow. 

Two forms of specimen are commonly nsed to determine the material parameters in the models outlined below (1) bulk tensile tests and (2) thick adheiend shear tests (TAST). There are two common forms of modelling creep at the macroscopic level. The first is through visco-elastic models, which can be visnalized as a combination of spring and dashpot elements. The simplest of these is the Voigt model shown in Fig. 2. The constitutive equation for this model and its solution for the conditions of creep (constant stress) are given" respectively as... 

Equation 6.42 together with the boundary conditions given by Equation 6.43 form the steady-state model, and its solution is given as... 

Description a screenshot of the plain template is shown in Fig. 8.26. The yellow blocks are where the required data are entered. Note that Solver needs to be used to obtain a solution to the problem. The configuration of Solver is shown as an inset in Fig. 8.26. The layout and formatting of the results are similar to the linear regression case. Two important differences are that the model and its Jacobian must be entered as a macro and that Solver must be used. The spreadsheet automatically creates the normal probability plot for the residuals and plots of the residuals as a function of y and y, as well as a time series plot of the residuals. Additional plots can be created by the user. An example of how to use the template is provided in Sect. 8.7.2 Nonlinear Regression Example. 

The first step in the mathematical model development is to define the problem. This involves stating clear goals for the modeling, including the various elements that pertain to the problem and its solution. 

This very short chapter sketches a theoretical scheme - the hydrodynamic scaling model - that is consistent with the results in the previous chapter, and that predicts aspects of the observed behavior of polymers in nondilute solution. The model is incomplete it does not predict everything. However, where it has been applied, its predictions agree with experiment. Here the model and its developments as of date of writing are described qualitatively, the reader being referred to the literature for extended calculations. 

The term sensitivity analysis defines a collection of mathematical methods that can be used to explore the relationships between the values of the input parameters of a mathematical model and its solutions. Uncertainty analysis teUs us how our lack of knowledge of model inputs propagates to the predictive uncertainty of key model outputs. This could include the equivalent of determining experimental error bars but for model outputs. The sources of such uncertainty can include lack of... 

Rasaiah J C 1970 Equilibrium properties of ionic solutions the primitive model and its modification for aqueous solutions of the alkali halides at 25°C J. Chem. Phys. 52 704... 

The complete problem with composition gradients as well as a pressure gradient, may be regarded as a "generalized Poiseuille problem", and its Solution would be valuable for comparison with the limiting form of the dusty gas model for small dust concentrations. Indeed, it is the "large diameter" counterpart of the Knudsen solution in tubes of small diameter. 

Often, Hertz s work [27] is presented in a very simple form as the solution to the problem of a compliant spherical indentor against a rigid planar substrate. The assumption of the modeling make it clear that this solution is the same as the model of a rigid sphere pressed against a compliant planar substrate. In these cases, the contact radius a is related to the radius of the indentor R, the modulus E, and the Poisson s ratio v of the non-rigid material, and the compressive load P by... 

---