Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Limits of Reaction

M.l Reaction Yield M.2 The Limits of Reaction M.3 Combustion Analysis... [Pg.116]

The outline of this chapter is as follows First, some basic wave phenomena for separation, as well as integrated reaction separation processes, are illustrated. Afterwards, a simple mathematical model is introduced, which applies to a large class of separation as well as integrated reaction separation processes. In the limit of reaction equilibrium the model represents a system of quasilinear first-order partial differential equations. For the prediction of wave solutions of such systems an almost complete theory exists [33, 34, 38], which is summarized in a second step. Subsequently, application of this theory to different integrated reaction separation processes is illustrated. The emphasis is placed on reactive distillation and reactive chromatography, but applications to other reaction separation processes are also... [Pg.149]

In the reactive case, r is not equal to zero. Then, Eq. (3) represents a nonhmoge-neous system of first-order quasilinear partial differential equations and the theory is becoming more involved. However, the chemical reactions are often rather fast, so that chemical equilibrium in addition to phase equilibrium can be assumed. The chemical equilibrium conditions represent Nr algebraic constraints which reduce the dynamic degrees of freedom of the system in Eq. (3) to N - Nr. In the limit of reaction equilibrium the kinetic rate expressions for the reaction rates become indeterminate and must be eliminated from the balance equations (Eq. (3)). Since the model Eqs. (3) are linear in the reaction rates, this is always possible. Following the ideas in Ref. [41], this is achieved by choosing the first Nr equations of Eq. (3) as reference. The reference equations are solved for the unknown reaction rates and afterwards substituted into the remaining N - Nr equations. [Pg.156]

Strategies for Transient Kinetic Measurements. To simplify the kinetic behavior of the system, two sets of experimental conditions were selected. In the direction of aldehyde reduction, reaction was carried out under conditions where both aldehyde and NADH were present in large excess relative to the initial enzyme concentration, [E]o. To achieve the limitation of reaction to a single turnover of sites, the reaction was carried out in the presence of the potent inhibitor pyrazole (Pyr). Pyrazole reacts rapidly and quasi-irreversibly to trap enzyme-bound NAD product in the form of a covalent adduct at the 4-position of the nicotinamide ring [Eq. (2)]. [Pg.183]

A sealed-vessel batch approach represents an attractive choice in the scale up of microwave-promoted reactions. The primary advantage is that most small-scale reactions are developed under sealed-vessel conditions in monomode equipment thus, scale up is potentially straightforward with little or no reoptimization needed. Disadvantages to this approach are the limits of reaction volume that can be irradiated as well as the safety requirements when working with vessels under pressure. [Pg.16]

Relations (4.182) express the limitation of reaction rates by diffusion known in chemical kinetics [132] (roughly, inversions of are proportional to diffusion coefficients, cf. Sect.4.10). [Pg.183]

In the example given above of reacting a dibasic acid, adipic acid, with a trifunctional alcohol, glycerol, which is of the type A B, we have to take 2 moles of glycerol and 3 of adipic acid, or 5 altogether, containing 12 equivalents and /avg= 12/5 = 2.4. Then at Xn = oo, p = 212.4 and the limit of reaction will be 5/6 = 0.833. This, in fact, represents the maximum amount of reaction that can occur before gelation under any distribution of combinations, provided only, that the reaction is all intermolecular. [Pg.850]

This is the limit of reaction (or activation) control the rate in solution is controlled by the activation-controlled reaction between the reactants, k. The second limit corresponds to diffusional control, where the rate of reaction is controlled by the rate of diffusion of the reactants, k. ... [Pg.227]

In some cases purely correlational models are quite effective Understanding the nature and limitations of correlation models also helps us to better understand the limitations of reaction modeling itself ... [Pg.9]

The choice of reactor temperature depends on many factors. Generally, the higher the rate of reaction, the smaller the reactor volume. Practical upper limits are set by safety considerations, materials-of-construction limitations, or maximum operating temperature for the catalyst. Whether the reaction system involves single or multiple reactions, and whether the reactions are reversible, also affects the choice of reactor temperature, as we shall now discuss. [Pg.41]

At the limit of extremely low particle densities, for example under the conditions prevalent in interstellar space, ion-molecule reactions become important (see chapter A3.51. At very high pressures gas-phase kinetics approach the limit of condensed phase kinetics where elementary reactions are less clearly defined due to the large number of particles involved (see chapter A3.6). [Pg.759]

For themial unimolecular reactions with bimolecular collisional activation steps and for bimolecular reactions, more specifically one takes the limit of tire time evolution operator for - co and t —> + co to describe isolated binary collision events. The corresponding matrix representation of f)is called the scattering matrix or S-matrix with matrix elements... [Pg.773]

Instead of concentrating on the diffiisioii limit of reaction rates in liquid solution, it can be histnictive to consider die dependence of bimolecular rate coefficients of elementary chemical reactions on pressure over a wide solvent density range covering gas and liquid phase alike. Particularly amenable to such studies are atom recombination reactions whose rate coefficients can be easily hivestigated over a wide range of physical conditions from the dilute-gas phase to compressed liquid solution [3, 4]. [Pg.845]

The probability matrix plays an important role in many processes in chemical physics. For chemical reactions, the probability of reaction is often limited by tunnelling tlnough a barrier, or by the fonnation of metastable states (resonances) in an intennediate well. Equivalently, the conductivity of a molecular wire is related to the probability of transmission of conduction electrons tlttough the junction region between the wire and the electrodes to which the wire is attached. [Pg.964]

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. [Pg.968]

Figure B2.4.5. Simulated lineshapes for an intennolecular exchange reaction in which the bond joining two strongly coupled nuclei breaks and re-fomis at a series of rates, given beside tlie lineshape. In slow exchange, the typical spectrum of an AB spin system is shown. In the limit of fast exchange, the spectrum consists of two lines at tlie two chemical shifts and all the coupling has disappeared. Figure B2.4.5. Simulated lineshapes for an intennolecular exchange reaction in which the bond joining two strongly coupled nuclei breaks and re-fomis at a series of rates, given beside tlie lineshape. In slow exchange, the typical spectrum of an AB spin system is shown. In the limit of fast exchange, the spectrum consists of two lines at tlie two chemical shifts and all the coupling has disappeared.
This treatment of reaction at the limit of bulk diffusion control is essentially the same as that presented by HugoC 69j. It is attractive computationally, since only a single two-point boundary value problem must be solved, namely that posed by equations (11.15) and conditions (11.16). This must be re-solved each time the size of the pellet is changed, since the pellet radius a appears in the boundary conditions. However, the initial value problem for equations (11.12) need be solved only once as a preliminary to solving (11.15) and (11.16) for any number of different pellet sizes. [Pg.117]

These should be con describe the same reaction, s but at the limit of fine Physically the interesting f appearance of the pressure p ablej with the consequence describe the system at the at the limit of fine pores, true that the pressure wit ni sense that percentage variat of the pressure variations i permeability, so convective permeability and pressure gr the origin of the two terms... [Pg.168]

In section 11.4 Che steady state material balance equations were cast in dimensionless form, therary itancifying a set of independent dimensionless groups which determine ice steady state behavior of the pellet. The same procedure can be applied to the dynamical equations and we will illustrate it by considering the case t f the reaction A - nB at the limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability, as described by equations (12.29)-(12.31). [Pg.168]

In retrospect, this study has demonstrated the limitations of two commonly accepted methods of analysing solubilisation and micellar catalysis, respectively. It has become clear that solubilisate ririg-current induced shifts need to be interpreted with due caution. These data indicate a proximity of solubilisate and parts of the surfactant and, strictly, do not specify the location within the micelle where the encounter takes place. Also the use of the pseudophase model for bimolecular reactions requires precaution. When distribution of the reactants over the micelle is not comparable, erroneous results are likely to be obtained... [Pg.153]

The kinetics of the reactions were complicated, but three broad categories were distinguished in some cases the rate of reaction followed an exponential course corresponding to a first-order form in others the rate of reaction seemed to be constant until it terminated abruptly when the aromatic had been consumed yet others were susceptible to autocatalysis of varying intensities. It was realised that the second category of reactions, which apparently accorded to a zeroth-order rate, arose from the superimposition of the two limiting kinetic forms, for all degrees of transition between these forms could be observed. [Pg.52]

The significance of establishing a limiting rate of reaction upon encounter for mechanistic studies has been pointed out ( 2.5). In studies of reactivity, as well as settii an absolute limit to the significance of reactivity in particular circumstances, the experimental observation of the limit has another dependent importance if further structural modification of the aromatic compound leads ultimately to the onset of reaction at a rate exceeding the observed encounter rate then a new electrophile must have become operative, and reactivities established above the encounter rate cannot properly be compared with those measured below it. [Pg.125]

Mixed aldol condensations can be effective only if we limit the number of reaction pos sibilities It would not be useful for example to treat a solution of acetaldehyde and propanal with base A mixture of four aldol addition products forms under these condi tions Two of the products are those of self addition... [Pg.774]

As with other problems with stoichiometry, it is the less abundant reactant that limits the product. Accordingly, we define the extent of reaction p to be the fraction of A groups that have reacted at any point. Since A and B groups... [Pg.309]

The extent of reaction p is again based on the group present in limiting amount. For the system under consideration, p is the fraction of A groups that have reacted. [Pg.316]


See other pages where The Limits of Reaction is mentioned: [Pg.117]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.834]    [Pg.848]    [Pg.958]    [Pg.2949]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.80]   


SEARCH



Reaction limit

Reaction limitation

© 2024 chempedia.info