The Electrodes

The working electrode current (i.e. detector response) is strongly influenced by voltage changes between the electrode and the mobile phase. A constant and known potential difference between the working electrode and the mobile phase is therefore a vital requirement to obtain stable, reproducible and predictable detector response. 

3-electrode detection system with simplified electronic diagram 

The working electrode is kept at zero potential by connecting it to the virtual ground of the electronics. A counter electrode CE (auxiliary electrode ae) is used to regulate the potential difference between the reference electrode and the working electrode, necessary for electrolysis of the analyte. 

Due to polarisation processes in the electrode/mobile phase boundary layer and potential drop (IR-drop) caused by electrical resistance of the mobile phase (in case of poorly conducting mobile phases) the potential applied on the auxiliary electrode versus the working electrode may differ substantially from the potential of the mobile phase versus the working electrode. Moreover, polarisation and electrical resistance are strongly influenced by mobile phase composition while IR-drop is also dependent on the current between the auxiliary and working electrodes. 

A stable and predictable potential difference between the mobile phase and the working electrode is therefore impossible with a two-electrode system a third electrode is needed to monitor the potential of the mobile phase. 

The product of the dissolution process of silicon electrodes in HF is fluosilicic acid, H2SiF6. In contrast to HF, H2SiF6 is mostly (75%) dissociated into Sily and 2H+ in aqueous solution at RT. The diffusion coefficient of the SiF at RT decreases from 1.2X10 5 cmV1 for 0.83 mol 1 1 to 0.45 cm2s 1 for 2.5 moll-1, with values of activation energy around 0.2 eV [We7]. 

So far only aqueous solutions have been considered however, mixtures of HF and ethanol or methanol are quite common, because this addition reduces the surface tension and thereby the sticking probability of hydrogen bubbles. While substantial quantities of ethanol or methanol are needed to reduce the surface tension, cationic or anionic surfactants fulfill the same purpose in concentrations as low as 0.01 M [So3, Chl6]. 

If aluminum is present on the electrode (for example if used for interconnects), an ammonium fluoride-based electrolyte is more desirable than HF, because A1 is only stable in the pH range of about 4 to 8.5 [Oh4]. Note that PS formation is observed in ammonium fluoride-based electrolytes [Ku5], as well as in water-free mixtures of acetonitrile and HF [Ril, Pr7], but not in alkaline electrolytes. 

This section deals with the electrodes in the electrochemical set-up, with special emphasis on the silicon electrode and its semiconducting character. An electrochemical cell with its complete electrical connections, as shown in Fig. 1.3 a and b, is similar to the well-known four-point probe used for applying a defined bias to a solid-state device. The two tines that supply the current are connected to 

The measurement of potentials in electrolytes is not as easy as it is for solid-state devices. Depending on the composition of the electrolyte and the electrode material a monolayer of adsorbates or a thin passivation layer may be formed on the electrode, and can significantly shift the electrode potential. These effects have to be taken into account for the working as well as for the counter electrode. The potential at the latter becomes irrelevant if a reference electrode is used. The reference electrode should be placed as close as possible to the Si electrode or it can access the Si electrode via a capillary. The size of the reference electrode is not rel- 

---

If an appreciable current flows between the electrode and the solution, thus disturbing the reversible thermodynamic equilibrium conditions, the electrode is said to be polarized and the system is then operating under irreversible conditions. 

The normal process is a rapid-but-smooth combustion of the fuel-air mixture in the engine due to the propagation of a flame front emanating from the spark created between the electrodes of the spark plug. 

After a heat treatment of several hours the electrodes are deposited by sputtering a 50 nm base layer of Ni/Cr or NiAVi followed by 1.5 pm Au-layer generated by galvanization. 

There are some theoretical complications discussed in Refs. 91 and 92. Experimental complications include adsorption of solvent or of film on the electrode [93,94] the effect may be used to detect atmospheric contaminants. The atmosphere around the electrode may be flushed with dry nitrogen to avoid condensation problems [87]. 

In recent years, advances in experimental capabilities have fueled a great deal of activity in the study of the electrified solid-liquid interface. This has been the subject of a recent workshop and review article [145] discussing structural characterization, interfacial dynamics and electrode materials. The field of surface chemistry has also received significant attention due to many surface-sensitive means to interrogate the molecular processes occurring at the electrode surface. Reviews by Hubbard [146, 147] and others [148] detail the progress. In this and the following section, we present only a brief summary of selected aspects of this field. 

The development of scanning probe microscopies and x-ray reflectivity (see Chapter VIII) has allowed molecular-level characterization of the structure of the electrode surface after electrochemical reactions [145]. In particular, the important role of adsorbates in determining the state of an electrode surface is illustrated by scanning tunneling microscopic (STM) images of gold (III) surfaces in the presence and absence of chloride ions [153]. Electrodeposition of one metal on another can also be measured via x-ray diffraction [154]. 

We now consider briefly the matter of electrode potentials. The familiar Nemst equation was at one time treated in terms of the solution pressure of the metal in the electrode, but it is better to consider directly the net chemical change accompanying the flow of 1 faraday (7 ), and to equate the electrical work to the free energy change. Thus, for the cell... 

It is now assumed that consists of a chemical component and an electrical component and that it is only the latter that is affected by changing the electrode potential. The specific assumption is that... 

One of the main uses of these wet cells is to investigate surface electrochemistry [94, 95]. In these experiments, a single-crystal surface is prepared by UFIV teclmiqiies and then transferred into an electrochemical cell. An electrochemical reaction is then run and characterized using cyclic voltaimnetry, with the sample itself being one of the electrodes. In order to be sure that the electrochemical measurements all involved the same crystal face, for some experiments a single-crystal cube was actually oriented and polished on all six sides Following surface modification by electrochemistry, the sample is returned to UFIV for... 

There is an ordered layer of solvent dipoles next to the electrode surface, the extent of whose orientation is expected to depend on the charge on the electrode. 

The simplest model for water at the electrode surface has just two possible orientations of the water molecules at the surface, and was initially described by Watts-Tobin [22]. The associated potential drop is given by... 

The experimental data and arguments by Trassatti [25] show that at the PZC, the water dipole contribution to the potential drop across the interface is relatively small, varying from about 0 V for An to about 0.2 V for In and Cd. For transition metals, values as high as 0.4 V are suggested. The basic idea of water clusters on the electrode surface dissociating as the electric field is increased has also been supported by in situ Fourier transfomr infrared (FTIR) studies [26], and this model also underlies more recent statistical mechanical studies [27]. 

The fact that more than one molecule of water may be displaced for each anion adsorbed, and that the adsorption energy of these water molecules will show a complex dependence on the electrode potential. 

These calculations have, as their aim, the generation of an adsorption isotherm, relating the concentration of ions in the solution to the coverage in the IHP and the potential (or more usually the charge) on the electrode. No complete calculations have been carried out incorporating all the above temrs. In general, the analytical fomi for the isothemr is... 

Only at extremely high electric fields are the water molecules fiilly aligned at the electrode surface. For electric fields of the size normally encountered, a distribution of dipole directions is found, whose half-widtli is strongly dependent on whether specific adsorption of ions takes place. In tlie absence of such adsorption the distribution fiinction steadily narrows, but in the presence of adsorption the distribution may show little change from that found at the PZC an example is shown in figure A2.4.10 [30]. 

---