The Working Electrode

The potential selected for the working electrode versus the reference electrode (i.e. versus mobile phase) is applied and controlled by the auxiliary electrode if any difference is measured between the potential setting and the actual potential between the working and reference electrodes, the auxiliary electrode adapts its potential to eliminate the difference. 

The potential of the working electrode versus the reference electrode is referred to as the potential of the working electrode (i.e. the detection potential). 

To determine the optimum working electrode potential for a certain analysis it is necessary to know how detector response (electrolysis current) is related to the working electrode potential (voltage). Such a relationship (voltammogram) provides practically all information necessary to determine the optimum detection potential for a certain analyte under given chromatographic conditions. 

To obtain the voltammogram for an electro-active substance X under given chromatographic conditions the peak heights of X (electrolysis current of X) are plotted versus corresponding working electrode potentials. 

---

Electrochemical methods may be classified into two broad classes, namely potentiometric metiiods and voltannnetric methods. The fonner involves the measurement of the potential of a working electrode iimnersed in a solution containing a redox species of interest with respect to a reference electrode. These are equilibrium experiments involving no current flow and provide themiodynamic infomiation only. The potential of the working electrode responds in a Nemstian maimer to the activity of the redox species, whilst that of the reference electrode remains constant. In contrast, m voltannnetric methods the system is perturbed... 

Stripping voltammetry involves the pre-concentration of the analyte species at the electrode surface prior to the voltannnetric scan. The pre-concentration step is carried out under fixed potential control for a predetennined time, where the species of interest is accumulated at the surface of the working electrode at a rate dependent on the applied potential. The detemiination step leads to a current peak, the height and area of which is proportional to the concentration of the accumulated species and hence to the concentration in the bulk solution. The stripping step can involve a variety of potential wavefomis, from linear-potential scan to differential pulse or square-wave scan. Different types of stripping voltaimnetries exist, all of which coimnonly use mercury electrodes (dropping mercury electrodes (DMEs) or mercury film electrodes) [7, 17]. 

Adsorptive stripping analysis involves pre-concentration of the analyte, or a derivative of it, by adsorption onto the working electrode, followed by voltanmietric iiieasurement of the surface species. Many species with surface-active properties are measurable at Hg electrodes down to nanoniolar levels and below, with detection limits comparable to those for trace metal detemiination with ASV. 

In an alternative design, the actual tip of the ultrasonic hom may be used as the working electrode after insertion of an isolated metal disc [77, 78 and 79]. With this electrode, known as the sonotrode, very high limiting currents are obtained at comparatively low ultrasound intensities, and diflflision layers of less than 1 pm have been reported. Furdiemiore, the magniPide of the limiting currents has been found to be proportional to D, enabling a parallel to be drawn with hydrodynamic electrodes. 

Figure C2.8.3. A tliree-electrode electrochemical set-up used for the measurement of polarization curves. A potentiostat is used to control the potential between the working electrode and a standard reference electrode. The current is measured and adjusted between an inert counter-electrode (typically Pt) and the working electrode.

The electrode whose potential is a function of the analyte s concentration (also known as the working electrode). 

The potential of the working electrode, which changes as the composition of the electrochemical cell changes, is monitored by including a reference electrode and a high-impedance potentiometer. 

Coulometric methods of analysis are based on an exhaustive electrolysis of the analyte. By exhaustive we mean that the analyte is quantitatively oxidized or reduced at the working electrode or reacts quantitatively with a reagent generated at the working electrode. There are two forms of coulometry controlled-potential coulometry, in which a constant potential is applied to the electrochemical cell, and controlled-current coulometry, in which a constant current is passed through the electrochemical cell. 

Selecting a Constant Potential In controlled-potential coulometry, the potential is selected so that the desired oxidation or reduction reaction goes to completion without interference from redox reactions involving other components of the sample matrix. To see how an appropriate potential for the working electrode is selected, let s develop a constant-potential coulometric method for Cu + based on its reduction to copper metal at a Pt cathode working electrode. 

Maintaining Current Efficiency To illustrate why changing the working electrode s potential can lead to less than 100% current efficiency, let s consider the coulometric analysis for Fe + based on its oxidation to Fe + at a Pt working electrode in 1 M H2SO4. 

The ladder diagram for this system is shown in Figure 11.24a. Initially the potential of the working electrode remains nearly constant at a level near the standard-state potential for the Fe UFe redox couple. As the concentration of Fe + decreases, however, the potential of the working electrode shifts toward more positive values until another oxidation reaction can provide the necessary current. Thus, in this case the potential eventually increases to a level at which the oxidation of H2O occurs. 

Since the current due to the oxidation of H3O+ does not contribute to the oxidation of Fe +, the current efficiency of the analysis is less than 100%. To maintain a 100% current efficiency the products of any competing oxidation reactions must react both rapidly and quantitatively with the remaining Fe +. This may be accomplished, for example, by adding an excess of Ce + to the analytical solution (Figure 11.24b). When the potential of the working electrode shifts to a more positive potential, the first species to be oxidized is Ce +. 

The Ce + produced at the working electrode rapidly mixes with the solution, where it reacts with any available Fe +. 

In this manner, a current efficiency of 100% is maintained. Furthermore, since the concentration of Ce + remains at its initial level, the potential of the working electrode remains constant as long as any Fe + is present. This prevents other oxidation reactions, such as that for liiO, from interfering with the analysis. A species, such as Ce +, which is used to maintain 100% current efficiency, is called a mediator. 

Instrumentation Controlled-current coulometry normally is carried out using a galvanostat and an electrochemical cell consisting of a working electrode and a counterelectrode. The working electrode, which often is constructed from Pt, is also... 

The ability to control selectivity by carefully selecting the working electrode s potential, makes controlled-potential coulometry particularly useful for the analysis of alloys. For example, the composition of an alloy containing Ag, Bi, Cd, and Sb... 

Controllcd-Currcnt Coulomctry The use of a mediator makes controlled-current coulometry a more versatile analytical method than controlled-potential coulome-try. For example, the direct oxidation or reduction of a protein at the working electrode in controlled-potential coulometry is difficult if the protein s active redox site lies deep within its structure. The controlled-current coulometric analysis of the protein is made possible, however, by coupling its oxidation or reduction to a mediator that is reduced or oxidized at the working electrode. Controlled-current coulometric methods have been developed for many of the same analytes that may be determined by conventional redox titrimetry. These methods, several of which are summarized in Table 11.9, also are called coulometric redox titrations. 

Note that the calculation is worked as if 8203 is oxidized directly at the working electrode instead of in solution. 

Reduction of Fe + to Fe + occurs at the working electrode, making it the cathode in the electrochemical cell. 

Sign Conventions Since the reaction of interest occurs at the working electrode, the classification of current is based on this reaction. A current due to the analyte s reduction is called a cathodic current and, by convention, is considered positive. Anodic currents are due to oxidation reactions and carry a negative value. 

Influence of Applied Potential on the Faradaic Current As an example, let s consider the faradaic current when a solution of Fe(CN)6 is reduced to Fe(CN)6 at the working electrode. The relationship between the concentrations of Fe(CN)6 , Fe(CN)6 A and the potential of the working electrode is given by the Nernst equation thus... 

Although the applied potential at the working electrode determines if a faradaic current flows, the magnitude of the current is determined by the rate of the resulting oxidation or reduction reaction at the electrode surface. Two factors contribute to the rate of the electrochemical reaction the rate at which the reactants and products are transported to and from the surface of the electrode, and the rate at which electrons pass between the electrode and the reactants and products in solution. 

In voltammetry the working electrode s surface area is significantly smaller than that used in coulometry. Consequently, very little analyte undergoes electrolysis, and the analyte s concentration in bulk solution remains essentially unchanged. 

Determining Concentration bet s assume that the redox reaction at the working electrode is... 

Anodic stripping voltammetry consists of two steps (Figure 11.37). The first is a controlled potential electrolysis in which the working electrode, usually a hanging mercury drop or mercury film, is held at a cathodic potential sufficient to deposit the metal ion on the electrode. For example, with Cu + the deposition reaction is... 

In the second step, the potential is scanned anodically toward more positive potentials. When the potential of the working electrode is sufficiently positive the analyte is stripped from the electrode, returning to solution as its oxidized form... 

Ampcromctry The final voltammetric technique to be considered is amperome-try, in which a constant potential is applied to the working electrode, and current is measured as a function of time. Since the potential is not scanned, amperometry does not lead to a voltammogram. 

One important application of amperometry is in the construction of chemical sensors. One of the first amperometric sensors to be developed was for dissolved O2 in blood, which was developed in 1956 by L. C. Clark. The design of the amperometric sensor is shown in Figure 11.38 and is similar to potentiometric membrane electrodes. A gas-permeable membrane is stretched across the end of the sensor and is separated from the working and counter electrodes by a thin solution of KCl. The working electrode is a Pt disk cathode, and an Ag ring anode is the... 

The residual current, in turn, has two sources. One source is a faradaic current due to the oxidation or reduction of trace impurities in the sample, i . The other source is the charging current, ich> that is present whenever the working electrode s potential changes. 

Electrochemical Detectors Another common group of HPLC detectors are those based on electrochemical measurements such as amperometry, voltammetry, coulometry, and conductivity. Figure 12.29b, for example, shows an amperometric flow cell. Effluent from the column passes over the working electrode, which is held at a potential favorable for oxidizing or reducing the analytes. The potential is held constant relative to a downstream reference electrode, and the current flowing between the working and auxiliary electrodes is measured. Detection limits for amperometric electrochemical detection are 10 pg-1 ng of injected analyte. 

---