The Detector Response

A steady concentration of the reactant is not observed when the confluent reagent stream is not properly added. Pronounced differences in matrix composition (e.g., colour and suspended matter), flow rates and viscosity of the carrier and confluent streams may result in a pulsed addition of the confluent stream. The effect is random, but if the fluid-propelling device is a peristaltic pump, it is characterised by a typical frequency, dictated by the rotation speed of the peristaltic pump. A pulsating flow is then established, leading to undulations in the recorded peak. The effect is reduced if the involved streams converge with similar mean linear velocities. As the effect is characterised by a constant frequency, the modulated signal (ripple) is easily filtered out. 

The analytical results are obtained by evaluating the detector response obtained after handling the samples and standard solutions. They generally rely on transient peaks recorded during passage of the flowing zones through the detector. 

Most spectrophotometric flow-based analytical procedures involve single analyte determination or multi-parametric determinations carried out in multi-channel analysers, with an independent analytical channel for each analyte. Consequently, analytical results are obtained after converting all of the recorded peaks to single values [139], usually referred to as the analytical signals. 

Either flat or bell-shaped peaks are normally recorded in flow analysis therefore, these types of peaks are dealt with separately. 

These peaks are inherent to segmented-flow analysers and to certain unsegmented-flow systems using large sample volumes. A plateau is 

---

Essential features of an automated method are the specificity, ie, the assay should be free from interference by other semm or urine constituents, and the sensitivity, ie, the detector response for typical sample concentration of the species measured should be large enough compared to the noise level to ensure assay precision. Also important are the speed, ie, the reaction should occur within a convenient time interval (for fast analysis rates), and adequate range, the result for most samples should fall within the allowable range of the assay. 

Oxygen Transport. The most widely used methods for measuring oxygen transport are based upon the Ox-Tran instmment (Modem Controls, Inc.). Several models exist, but they all work on the same principle. The most common apphcation is to measure the permeabihty of a film sample. Typically, oxygen is introduced on one side of the film, and nitrogen gas sweeps the other side of the film to a coulometric detector. The detector measures the rate that oxygen comes through the film. The detector response at steady state can easily be converted to At (eq. 1). Simple... 

The algorithm is based both on a mathematical simulation of a spectmm of secondary radiation emitted by a sample to be studied and the detector response function. The detection limit is given by criteria 3s ... 

To obtain an accurate quantitative analysis of the composition of a mixture, a knowledge of the response of the detector to each component is required. If the detector response is not the same for each component, then the areas under the peaks clearly cannot be used as a direct measure of the proportion of the components in the mixture. The experiment described illustrates the use of an internal normalisation method for the quantitative analysis of a mixture of the following three components ethyl acetate (ethanoate), octane, and ethyl n-propyl ketone (hexan-3-one). 

When the oven temperature has stabilised, inject a 0.3 pL sample of mixture B and decide from the peak areas whether the detector response is the same for each component. 

If the detector response differs, make up by weight a 1 1 mixture of each of the separate components (I, II, and III) with compound (IV). Inject a 0.1 pL sample of each mixture, measure the corresponding peak area, and hence deduce the factors which will correct the peak areas of components (I), (II), and (III) with respect to the internal standard (IV). 

With flame emission spectroscopy, the detector response E is given by the expression... 

Delta function response - Over most of the wavelengths of interest, optical and infrared detectors produce one photoelectron for every detected photon, which provides a one-to-one correspondence between detected photons and photoelectrons. This means that the detector response is exactly linear to the intensity incident on the detector - an attribute that allows astronomers to precisely remove sky background and electronic bias to accurately measure the intensity of the astronomical object. 

To enable qnantitative measurements to be made, the analyst requires the ability to determine the areas or heights of the detector responses of analyte(s) and any internal standard that may be present and then, from these figures, to derive the amount(s) of analyte(s) present in the unknown sample. The software provided with the mass spectrometer allows this to be done with a high degree of automation if the analyst so desires. 

A solution oontaining 0.5 mg mM of an analyte gives a detector response (based on peak height) of 48 3 arbitrary units when analysed by LC-MS at a flow rate of 0.75 ml min". At a flow rate of 1.00 ml min", the detector response was 49 3 arbitrary units. Is the mass speotrometer behaving as a conoentration- or mass-flow-sensitive detector ... 

The alternative is to add a UV-absorbing material to the mobile phase. If a compound elntes from the HPLC colnmn that does not absorb UV radiation, the detector response will decrease. An additive should be chosen which has significant absorption in order that it may be added at low concentration and thus have minimal effect on the chromatographic separation. It is also important that reaction between the analyte(s) and additive does not occur. 

The spectrometer is behaving as a concentration-sensitive detector as the signal intensity remains constant as the flow rate increases. If it were mass-sensitive, the detector response would increase. 

The data shown in Figures 6 A-D indicate that while the smaller particles 85, 98 eind 109 nm are indistinguishable from the dissolved solute, sodium dichromate, in as far as detector behaviour is concerned, the detector response differs significantly for the larger diameter particles. The reduced peak area and hence t irbi-dity indicated for the larger particles is a direct result of the optical effects noted earlier. The observations are consistent with the findings of Heller and Tabibian that the corona effect... 

Theory. We will outline theory developed earlier (11,12) for converting the detector response F(v) from a turbidity detector into particle size information. F(v) is related to the dispersion-corrected chromatogram W(y) by the integral equation... 

The detector response ratio is elevated with respect to the homopolymer line but very near parallel to it less than = 0.74,or number average styrene sequence lengths less... 

The FDA requests that the method exhibit sufficient sensitivity to measure accurately the residue of interest after fortification of the control matrix at half the tolerance concentration. Minimally, the detector response at the tolerance should be at least 10 times the average background response. 

Linearity verifies that sample solutions are in a concentration range in which the detector response is linearly proportional to analyte concentration. Current FDA guidelines call for establishing linearity. For regulatory methods, this is generally performed by preparing standard solutions at four or five concentrations, from 30 to 200% of the tolerance. 

Linearity is often assessed by examining the correlation coefficient (r) [or the coefficient of determination (r )] of the least-squares regression line of the detector response versus analyte concentration. A value of r = 0.995 (r = 0.99) is generally considered evidence of acceptable fit of the data to the regression line. Although the use of r or is a practical way of evaluating linearity, these parameters, by... 

A new nonweighted linear calibration curve is to be generated with every set of samples analyzed. The calibration standards are interspersed among the analytical samples, preferably with a standard between every two analytical samples, and injected into the HPLC/OECD system. The calibration curve is generated by plotting peak height of the detector response against the concentration for each calibration standard of EMA and methylated HEMA. 

Assay sensitivity is defined here as the concentration of analyte that inhibits the observed absorbance by 50% or the IC50. The lower limit of detection (LLD) is the lowest analyte concentration that elicits a detector response significantly different from the detector response in the absence of analyte. In some cases, the LLD is defined as three standard deviations from the mean of the zero analyte control. In other cases, the LLD is defined empirically by determining the lowest concentration of analyte that can be measured with a given degree of accuracy. Readers are referred to Grotjan and Keel for a simplified explanation and to Rodbard for the complete mathematics on the determination of LLD. 

The signal tram gas chroaatographic detectors can be further characterized as nass or concentration dependent. For concentration-dependent detectors the aost notable feature is that the detector response is dependent upon the flow rate through the detector (carrier gas and makeup gas, if any) and, therefore, the sensitivity of the detector is usually defined as the product of the pe dc area and flow rate divided by the wei t of the sanple. For B ss-dependent detectors sensitivity is defined as the product of the peak area divided by the sanple wel t in grans or noles and is independent of flow rate through the detector. 

Detectors are usually conpued in terns of their operational characteristics defined by the nininvin detectable quantity of standards, the selectivity response ratio between standards of different conpositlon or structure, and the range of the linear portion of the detector-response calibration curve. These terns are wid. y used to neasure the perfomance of different chronatographic detectors and were fomally defined in section 1.8.1. 

A linear dependence between detector response and the amount of sample entering the detector is expected for phosphorus and is generally found. Deviations from the predicted detector response are more common with sulfur-containing than phosphorus-containing compounds (171,173). The detector response in the sulfur aK>de can be described by equation (3.17)... 

---