Temperature calibration experiments

Thus, for a temperature calibration experiment on heating, the most important temperature is (the melting point). It should be mentioned that the determination of the melting point described above (i.e., a well-defined, sharp melting point) is valid only for substances of high purity (>99.9%). For materials with purity less than 99.9%, the determination of the melting point is different, and it is described in Section 2.7. 

The determination of T 7 r, and A rco,r has been described in the previous section. As mentioned, the energy equivalent of the calorimeter e0 can be obtained by calibration. Each calibration experiment also requires the recording of a temperature-time curve such as that in figure 7.2. 

Figure 8.3 Typical temperature-time curves obtained when two calibrations are made in isoperibol reaction-solution calorimetric studies of (a) an exothermic reaction and (b) an endothermic reaction. A fore period of the first calibration experiment B main period of the first calibration experiment ...

Analogously to the dynamic method, the energy equivalent of the calorimeter, k.Q, can be obtained by performing calibration experiments in the isothermal mode of operation, using electrically generated heat or the fusion of substances with well-known A us//. Recommendations for the calibration of the temperature scale of DSC instruments for isothermal operation have also been published [254,270]. 

To check that phenol was not self-associated at the concentration used, Sousa Lopes andThompson repeated the calibration experiments (i.e., the study of the temperature variation of el) for several phenol concentrations. Good linear plots of A against c at each temperature were observed, indicating that the Lambert-Beer law is valid and that the self-association is negligible. 

Most hterature references to pharmaceutical primary process monitoring are for batch processes, where a model of the process is built from calibration experiments [110, 111]. Many of these examples have led to greater understanding of the process monitored and can therefore be a precursor to design of a continuous process. For example, the acid-catalysed esterification of butan-l-ol by acetic acid was monitored through a factorial designed series of experiments in order to establish reaction kinetics, rate constants, end points, yields, equilibrium constants and the influence of initial water. Statistical analysis demonstrated that high temperatures and an excess of acetic acid were the optimal conditions [112]. 

An important prerequisite for the reproducibility of NMR experiments at elevated temperatures is the accurate determination of the temperature inside the sample volume of the probe. Often, there is a systematic error in the temperature displayed by the controller unit. Therefore, methods for the temperature calibration of MAS NMR probes under various working conditions, such as various heating rates, sample spinning frequencies, etc., are required for experiments at elevated temperatures. 

Accuracy of thermocouples should be 0.5°C. Temperature accuracy is especially important in steam sterilization validation because an error of just 0.1 °C in temperature measured by a faulty thermocouple will produce a 2.3% error in the calculated F0 value. Thermocouple accuracy is determined using National Bureau of Standards (NBS) traceable constant temperature calibration instruments such as those shown in Figure 6. Thermocouples should be calibrated before and after a validation experiment at two temperatures 0°C and 125°C. The newer temperature-recording devices are capable of automatically correcting temperature or slight errors in the thermocouple calibration. Any thermocouple that senses a temperature of more than 0.5°C away from the calibration temperature bath should be discarded. Stricter limits (i.e., <0.5°C) may be imposed according to the user s experience and expectations. Temperature recorders should be capable of printing temperature data in 0.1 °C increments. 

Accurate temperature calibration using the ASTM temperature standards [131, 132] is common practice for DSC and DTA. Calibration of thermobalances is more cumbersome. The key to proper use of TGA is to recognise that the decomposition temperatures measured are procedural and dependent on both sample and instrument related parameters [30]. Considerable experimental control must be exercised at all stages of the technique to ensure adequate reproducibility on a comparative basis. For (intralaboratory) standardisation purposes it is absolutely required to respect and report a number of measurement variables. ICTA recommendations should be followed [133-135] and should accompany the TG record. During the course of experiments the optimum conditions should be standardised and maintained within a given series of samples. Affolter and coworkers [136] have described interlaboratory tests on thermal analysis of polymers. 

The spring constant (Kq) in Eq. (1) is temperature dependent, but fortunately only to a small extent. However, the oscillating frequency changes significantly with temperature as a consequence of variations in gas density and changes in material properties. The TEOM is therefore not immediately suitable for temperature-programmed experiments, but, when careful calibrations are performed, such experiments can be carried out successfully. 

A sample of biphenyl (C6H5)2 weighing 0.526 g was ignited in a bomb calorimeter initially at 25°C, producing a temperature rise of 1.91 K. In a separate calibration experiment, a sample of benzoic acid CgF COOH weighing 0.825 g was ignited under identical conditions and produced a temperature rise of 1.94 K. For benzoic acid, the heat of combustion a constant pressure is known to be 3226 kJ mol-1 (that is, AU° = -3226 kJ mol-1.) Use this information to determine the standard enthalpy of combustion of biphenyl. 

This temperature calibration (Fig. 5.44) is derived from a range of culture experiments, sediment-trap data and sedimentary cores calibrated against 5180 values for planktonic species of the foraminiferan Globigerina (Prahl Wakeham 1987 Prahl et al. 1988). The U37 parameter can be measured to an accuracy of 0.02 units, potentially allowing temperature to be determined to within 0.5 °C. 

In order to obtain a direct and more accurate pressure determination, various internal pressure calibrants (e.g. quartz and ruby chips) are generally used. Internal calibrants, however, could not be used in the high temperature hydrothermal experiments due to interactions with the chemical system. In such cases, one of the more prevalent phases of the chemical system was calibrated as pressure indicator. For fluid-rich systems (methane-water), the pressures were also determined using the known phase equilibria of the methane hydrate decomposition and using shifts in the ruby fluorescence peak [8]. 

Two types of systems are commonly used power compensation and heat flux DSCs. In the power compensation apparatus temperatures of the sample and the reference are controlled independently by using separate but identical furnaces. The power input to the two furnaces is adjusted to equalize the temperatures. The energy required for the temperature equalization is a measure of the enthalpy or heat capacity in the sample relative to the reference. In heat flux DSC, the sample and the reference are interconnected by a metal disk that acts as a low-resistance heat-flow path. The entire assembly is placed inside a furnace. The changes in the enthalpy or heat capacity of the sample cause a difference in its temperature compared to the reference. The resulting heat flow is small because of the thermal contact between the sample and the reference. Calibration experiments are conducted to correlate enthalpy changes with the temperature differences. In both cases, the enthalpy changes are expressed in the units of energy per unit mass. 

---