Temperature adsorption-desorption heats

Sulfided samples were characterized with XRD, BET surface area, NO sorption capacity, ESR and FTIR spectroscopy. The details concerning the characterization procedures as well as certain properties of USY based samples can be found elsewhere (ref. 9, 10). The ammonia adsorption capacity of sulfided and non-sulfided catalysts and supports was measured from the desorption peak obtained during 3the temperature programmed desorption (heating rate 30 K min ). Each sample (0.1 g) after activation or sulfidation was saturated with ammonia (a series of 1 cm NH3 injections) at 375 K until full saturation was achieved. This was monitored as a sharp GC peak detected by thermal conductivity detector. Next, sample was purged 1 hour in purified helium at 375 K to remove the excess of weakly held ammonia and TPD started. 

In a recent paper [11] this approach has been generalized to deal with reactions at surfaces, notably dissociation of molecules. A lattice gas model is employed for homonuclear molecules with both atoms and molecules present on the surface, also accounting for lateral interactions between all species. In a series of model calculations equilibrium properties, such as heats of adsorption, are discussed, and the role of dissociation disequilibrium on the time evolution of an adsorbate during temperature-programmed desorption is examined. This approach is adaptable to more complicated systems, provided the individual species remain in local equilibrium, allowing of course for dissociation and reaction disequilibria. 

The opposite of adsorption, desorption, represents the end of the catalytic cycle. It is also the basis of temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), an important method of studying the heats of adsorption and reactions on a surface, so that the activation... 

CO oxidation is often quoted as a structure-insensitive reaction, implying that the turnover frequency on a certain metal is the same for every type of site, or for every crystallographic surface plane. Figure 10.7 shows that the rates on Rh(lll) and Rh(llO) are indeed similar on the low-temperature side of the maximum, but that they differ at higher temperatures. This is because on the low-temperature side the surface is mainly covered by CO. Hence the rate at which the reaction produces CO2 becomes determined by the probability that CO desorbs to release sites for the oxygen. As the heats of adsorption of CO on the two surfaces are very similar, the resulting rates for CO oxidation are very similar for the two surfaces. However, at temperatures where the CO adsorption-desorption equilibrium lies more towards the gas phase, the surface reaction between O and CO determines the rate, and here the two rhodium surfaces show a difference (Fig. 10.7). The apparent structure insensitivity of the CO oxidation appears to be a coincidence that is not necessarily caused by equality of sites or ensembles thereof on the different surfaces. 

Specific surface areas of the catalysts used were determined by nitrogen adsorption (77.4 K) employing BET method via Sorptomatic 1900 (Carlo-Erba). X-ray difiraction (XRD) patterns of powdered catalysts were carried out on a Siemens D500 (0 / 20) dififactometer with Cu K monochromatic radiation. For the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments the catalyst (0.3 g) was pre-treated at diflferent temperatures (100-700 °C) under helium flow (5-20 Nml min ) in a micro-catalytic tubular reactor for 3 hours. The treated sample was exposed to methanol vapor (0.01-0.10 kPa) for 2 hours at 260 °C. The system was cooled at room temperature under helium for 30 minutes and then heated at the rate of 4 °C min . Effluents were continuously analyzed using a quadruple mass spectrometer (type QMG420, Balzers AG). 

Figure 255. Experimental data of a desorption and an adsorption (air temperatures and dew points, flow and return line temperatures of the heating system)...

Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3 adsorbed on the samples was carried out on an Altamira TPD apparatus. NH3 adsorption was performed at 50°C on the sample that had been heat-treated at 120°C in a helium flow. After flushing with helium, the sample was subjected to TPD from 50 to 600°C (AT = 10°C min 1). The evolved NH3, H20 and N2 were monitored by mass spectroscopy by recording the mass signals of m/e = 16, 18 and 28, respectively using a VG Trio-1 mass spectrometer. 

As stated above, when probes with specific adsorption characteristics are used, additional chemical information can be extracted from adsorption-desorption experiments. Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) in particular is often employed to obtain information about specific sites in catalysts [55,56], The temperature at which desorption occurs indicates the strength of adsorption, whereas either the amount of gas consumed in the uptake or the amount of desorption upon heating attests to the concentration of the surface sites. The most common molecules used in TPD are NH3 and C02, which probe acidic and basic sites, respectively, but experiments with pyridine, Oz, H2, CO, H20, and other molecules are often performed as well [57-59], As an example, the ammonia... 

Fig. 4 (a) Stepwise dehydrocyclization of -hexane (21, 62). (b) Temperature programmed desorption of benzene originating from various adsorbates over Pt-AljOs. Temperature of adsorption 25°C. Rate of heating 23°C per minute. Detector monopolar mass spectrometer, the ordinate corresponds to the I intensity of mass number 78, in arbitrary units. For clarity, the thermodesorption curves for other compounds (starting hydrocarbon) hexene from hexa-dienes and hydrogen have not been shown (62c). 

When using the continuous flow method, however, some additional versatility is available in chemisorption measurements. For example, when data is required at an adsorbate pressure of 0.1 atm, a 10 % mixture of adsorbate, mixed with an inert carrier gas, is passed through the apparatus with the sample cooled to a temperature at which no chemisorption can occur. Upon warming the sample to the required temperature, adsorption occurs producing an adsorbate-deficient peak that is calibrated by injecting carrier gas into the flow stream. Equation (15.9) is then used to calculate the quantity adsorbed. This process is repeated for each concentration required. Caution must be exercised to avoid physical adsorption when the sample is cooled to prevent chemisorption. Should this occur, the adsorption peak due to chemisorption can be obscured by the desorption peak of physically bound adsorbate when the sample is heated. 

---