Task queue

Once the user is satisfied with the task queue that he has constructed by updating the run database, he must ensure that the angle readings on the goniometer circles are correct. These values are contained in the interface database. 

After the user verifies the chromatograph settings the specimen database updating program creates the run queue. The run queue contains one record for each data collection step in the upcoming batch. The run queue building task also checks for enough free disk space to hold the expected data files. 

Any implementation will also use internal stored variables operated on by the code of the operations, but they need not be the same as the model attributes used by the postconditions. Model attributes are only a hypothetical means of describing the object s state to help explain its behavior. For example, you might use the concept of its length to help describe operations on a queue (of tasks, orders, and so on), as shown in Figure 6.4. 

Chuck seemed almost like a humanoid computer without enough batchprocessing tasks in his queue and available for additional programming. It was not difficult to interest Chuck in our volunteer testing program. 

Narrow-Range Tasks If the system is configured so that each individual server only performs a narrow range of tasks, then this usually means that a number of different servers are required in order to perform all the required tasks for a customer. This means that the system will often be similar to a manufacturing flow line and so can be represented by queues in series. Of course, if there is some flexibility in the sequence in which tasks are done, then the system becomes more like a manufacturing job shop and can be represented by a network of queues. 

In the case of Poisson arrivals and exponential service, (7.5) is exact because in this case the network is product-form. In the case of Poisson arrivals but general service, (7.6) is exact as each station becomes an M/G/1 queue, for which the Pollaczek-Khintchine formula (43) holds. We see by comparing (63) and (64) that the flow line has a smaller approximate expected number-in-system if and only if cj s 1/2. This leads us to conclude that low variability favors the flow line. Thus, repetitive tasks are suited to the flow-fine arrangement, whereas tasks demanding cognitive skills may be better grouped. 

There are other aspects of task network model development. Some items are defining a simulation scenario, defining continuous processes within the model, and defining queues in front of tasks. Further details of these features can be obtained from the Micro Saint User s Guide (Micro Analysis and Design 1999). 

Stimulation, environmental vs. task, 1357, 1358 STL (stereo lithography format), 208 Stochastic approximation, 2634-2635 Stochastic counterpart method, 2635 Stochastic decision trees, 2384, 2385 Stochastic models, 2146-2170 benefits of mathematical analysis of, 2146 definition of, 2146, 2150 Markov chains, 2150-2156 in continuous time, 2154-2156 and Markov property, 2150-2151 queueing model based on, 2153-2154... 

Other elements of the STL include vectors, stacks, and queues. The emergence of the STL as a standard, key component of C++ has greatly expanded the breadth of tasks that are addressed by the libraries supplied with C++. 

Scheduling criteria. In designing schedulers, it is important to determine the desirable criteria for a scheduler. The low-level scheduler basically determines which task has the highest priority and then selects that task for execution it also maintains the ready queue. If the task currently executing has a lower priority than a ready task, the scheduler may preempt the executing task in favor of the waiting task. (This is particularly true in systems which have a real-time function.)... 

In [66], Ha initially extends [104] to include a service rate decision by homogeneous customers in a GI/GI/1 queue where FIFO (first-in first-out) scheduling is used. For example, the service rate decision may be applicable when a customer has the ability to choose an amount of preprocessing on a task that would affect the server effort required to complete the task. Ha shows that a pricing scheme with a variable fee and fixed rebate based on delay cost... 

As soon as a move command is available in the queue, a component of the motion server processes it and generates a new instruction for the motion controller. Upon receipt of the instruction, the motion controller moves the stage to the desired position. The server component involved in this task is different from the component involved in previous EtE flow. More importantly, both are not connected with each other for this particular task. Since the flow specifications of both components are not linked with each other, according to the AADL specification they can not be a part of a single EtE flow. Hence, this results in another EtE flow starting from the motion server and ending with the motion controller. The specification of this flow can be seen in Figure 2. 

The V language — a procedural, C-like lang ge. V includes tasks (similar to processes), asynchronous calls, and queues. 

The following example illustrates why it can be difficult or infeasible to automatically derive timing properties for complex embedded systems (Bohlin et al., 2009). Imagine a system that has a task that processes messages that arrive in a queue ... 

The loop s execution time obviously depends on the messages in the queue. Thus, a timing analysis needs to know the maximum queue length. It also may have to consider that other tasks may preempt the execution of the loop and add messages to the queue. 

FIFO ordering for global requests can easily be implemented as an ordered list, either dynamic or static. It is worth noting that MrsP can do with simple fixed-length lists because the maximum length of the FIFO queue is known a-priori, independently from the specific application, as the number of processors available determines the maximum degree of parallelism for the platform. The use of a dynamic list is also a viable option since each task can participate at most in one FIFO queue, it is possible to statically allocate a node for each task, and then add or remove it from a specific resource list when required. 

RTEMS implementation busy wait is implemented as a MCS (Mellor-Crummey and Scott) queue-based locks [21] exploiting the memory hierarchy of the platform spinning is performed on a local flag, easily fitting inside LI cache (no bus accesses), whose value is updated only once by the remote task that is releasing the resource (just one bus access). 

In the general case it is implementation defined whether or not a tasklet, when it blocks, releases the executor. The implementation may also block the executor, creating a new executor, if needed, to serve other tasklets and guarantee the progress of the task, or it may queue the tasklet for later resumption (in the same or different executor). In the latter case, the implementation releases the executor to execute other tasklets but maintain the state of the blocked tasklet in the executor, for later resumption. 

---