Systematic random approach

We have employed a more systematic random mutagenesis approach by dividing the BDI into consecutive clusters of 10 amino acid residues (Boxes) that are individually replaced with a string of 10 alanine residues in the full-length Hisg-tagged allele to facilitate affinity purification of the mutant protein (Valasek et ah, 2004). Alternatively, clusters rich in... 

Thus the completely random approach to the discovery of new MCRs was transformed in a systematic, semi-rational and powerful way. Future research using this elegant approach will certainly reveal many more novel MCRs. 

This presentation provides an overview of sampling methods and tools suitable to address most site characterizations. The basic sampling types discussed are the systematic, random, and judgmental sampling approaches. 

The most common sampling modes are SRS, discussed previously, stratified random sampling, and systematic random sampling. SRS over time or space consists of identifying times or places totally at random to take the samples. Hie great disadvantage of this approach is that certain portions of the lot or production times may be under or over represented, and process stability cannot be monitored effectively. Consequently, we do not recommend SRS for long-term examination of lot characteristics. 

The two sources of stochasticity are conceptually and computationally quite distinct. In (A) we do not know the exact equations of motion and we solve instead phenomenological equations. There is no systematic way in which we can approach the exact equations of motion. For example, rarely in the Langevin approach the friction and the random force are extracted from a microscopic model. This makes it necessary to use a rather arbitrary selection of parameters, such as the amplitude of the random force or the friction coefficient. On the other hand, the equations in (B) are based on atomic information and it is the solution that is approximate. For ejcample, to compute a trajectory we make the ad-hoc assumption of a Gaussian distribution of numerical errors. In the present article we also argue that because of practical reasons it is not possible to ignore the numerical errors, even in approach (A). 

The coarse-graining approach is commonly used for thermodynamic properties whereas the systematic or random sampling methods are appropriate for static structural properties such as the radial distribution function. 

HyperChem has a facility for a more systematic approach to the global minimum than just choosing random starting points. This facility is associated with the idea of simulated annealing. 

The design of a collaborative test must provide the additional information needed to separate the effect of random error from that due to systematic errors introduced by the analysts. One simple approach, which is accepted by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, is to have each analyst analyze two samples, X and Y, that are similar in both matrix and concentration of analyte. The results obtained by each analyst are plotted as a single point on a two-sample chart, using the result for one sample as the x-coordinate and the value for the other sample as the -coordinate. ... 

The "feedback loop in the analytical approach is maintained by a quality assurance program (Figure 15.1), whose objective is to control systematic and random sources of error.The underlying assumption of a quality assurance program is that results obtained when an analytical system is in statistical control are free of bias and are characterized by well-defined confidence intervals. When used properly, a quality assurance program identifies the practices necessary to bring a system into statistical control, allows us to determine if the system remains in statistical control, and suggests a course of corrective action when the system has fallen out of statistical control. 

In the previous section we described several internal methods of quality assessment that provide quantitative estimates of the systematic and random errors present in an analytical system. Now we turn our attention to how this numerical information is incorporated into the written directives of a complete quality assurance program. Two approaches to developing quality assurance programs have been described a prescriptive approach, in which an exact method of quality assessment is prescribed and a performance-based approach, in which any form of quality assessment is acceptable, provided that an acceptable level of statistical control can be demonstrated. 

Initial approaches to directed evolution of enzymes rested upon the introduction of random mutations in random sites of the enzyme by the use of the error-prone PCR technique [92] or on the DNA-shuffling method [93]. Extensive research has also been reported in which every amino acid site in an enzyme was systematically subjected to saturation mutagenesis [94]. 

Our approach for chiral resolution is quite systematic. Instead of randomly screening different chiral acids with racemic 7, optically pure N-pMB 19 was prepared from 2, provided to us from Medicinal Chemistry. With 19, several salts with both enantiomers of chiral acids were prepared for evaluation of their crystallinity and solubility in various solvent systems. This is a more systematic way to discover an efficient classical resolution. First, a (+)-camphorsulfonic acid salt of 19 crystallized from EtOAc. One month later, a diastereomeric (-)-camphorsulfonic acid salt of 19 also crystallized. After several investigations on the two diastereomeric crystalline salts, it was determined that racemic 7 could be resolved nicely with (+)-camphorsulfonic acid from n-BuOAc kinetically. In practice, by heating racemic 7 with 1.3equiv (+)-camphorsulfonic acid in n-BuOAc under reflux for 30 min then slowly cooling to room temperature, a cmde diastereomeric mixture of the salt (59% ee) was obtained as a first crop. The first crop was recrystallized from n-BuOAc providing 95% ee salt 20 in 43% isolated yield. (The optical purity was further improved to -100% ee by additional recrystallization from n-BuOAc and the overall crystallization yield was 41%). This chiral resolution method was more efficient and economical than the original bis-camphanyl amide method. 

The advantage of the measures as suggested here is that they point into the same direction as it is done by the verbal definitions. High precision and a high degree of accuracy, respectively, are characterized by high numerical values of the measures which approximate to 1 in the ideal case (absence of random and systematic deviations, respectively) and approximate to 0 if the deviations approach to 100%. In the worst cases, the numerical values prec(x) and acc(x) become negative which indicates that the relative random or systematic error exceeds 100%. 

---