System covariance matrix

E((v-E(v))(v-E(v)) ), covariance matrix of adjustments for linear systems (E(v) = 0 if eo = 0) F, is pseudo-covariance matrix (10.3.31) for nonlinear systems covariance matrix (9.3.43) for estimate errors in measured variables for linear systems and assuming E(e) = 0 F is pseudo-covariance matrix (10.3.33) for nonlinear systems covariance matrix (9.3.19) of estimate errors in unmeasured observable variables for linear systems and assuming E(e) = 0 K is pseudo-covariance matrix (10.3.34) for nonlinear systems matrix Fj. in the case that all unmeasured variables are observable attention F is another matrix, viz. that introduced as auxiliary matrix in (9.2.26)... 

The primary purpose for expressing experimental data through model equations is to obtain a representation that can be used confidently for systematic interpolations and extrapolations, especially to multicomponent systems. The confidence placed in the calculations depends on the confidence placed in the data and in the model. Therefore, the method of parameter estimation should also provide measures of reliability for the calculated results. This reliability depends on the uncertainties in the parameters, which, with the statistical method of data reduction used here, are estimated from the parameter variance-covariance matrix. This matrix is obtained as a last step in the iterative calculation of the parameters. 

Measurement noise covariance matrix R The main problem with the instrumentation system was the randomness of the infrared absorption moisture eontent analyser. A number of measurements were taken from the analyser and eompared with samples taken simultaneously by work laboratory staff. The errors eould be approximated to a normal distribution with a standard deviation of 2.73%, or a varianee of 7.46. 

Co-representation matrices explicit forms, 733 multiplication of, 731 of the nonunitary group, 732 Corliss, L. M., 757 Corson, E. M., 498 Coulomb field Dirac equation in, 637 Coulomb gauge, 643,657,664 Counting functions, 165 Covariance matrix, 160 Covariant amplitude of one-particle system, 511 of one, two, etc. particle systems, 511... 

Equations (41.15) and (41.19) for the extrapolation and update of system states form the so-called state-space model. The solution of the state-space model has been derived by Kalman and is known as the Kalman filter. Assumptions are that the measurement noise v(j) and the system noise w(/) are random and independent, normally distributed, white and uncorrelated. This leads to the general formulation of a Kalman filter given in Table 41.10. Equations (41.15) and (41.19) account for the time dependence of the system. Eq. (41.15) is the system equation which tells us how the system behaves in time (here in j units). Equation (41.16) expresses how the uncertainty in the system state grows as a function of time (here in j units) if no observations would be made. Q(j - 1) is the variance-covariance matrix of the system noise which contains the variance of w. 

It should be emphasized that for Markovian copolymers a knowledge of the values of structural parameters of such a kind will suffice to find the probability of any sequence Uk, i.e. for an exhaustive description of the microstructure of the chains of these copolymers with a given average composition. As for the composition distribution of Markovian copolymers, this obeys for any fraction of Z-mers the Gaussian formula whose covariance matrix elements are Dap/l where Dap depend solely on the values of structural parameters [2]. The calculation of their dependence on time, and the stoichiometric and kinetic parameters of the reaction system permits a complete statistical description of the chemical structure of Markovian copolymers to be accomplished. The above reasoning reveals to which extent the mathematical modeling of the processes of the copolymer synthesis is easier to perform provided the alternation of units in macromolecules is known to obey Markovian statistics. 

However, there is a mathematical method for selecting those variables that best distinguish between formulations—those variables that change most drastically from one formulation to another and that should be the criteria on which one selects constraints. A multivariate statistical technique called principal component analysis (PCA) can effectively be used to answer these questions. PCA utilizes a variance-covariance matrix for the responses involved to determine their interrelationships. It has been applied successfully to this same tablet system by Bohidar et al. [18]. 

In the context of our discussion in this chapter, we represent the measurement obtained using the waveform 4> as a Gaussian measurement with covariance Rfy The current state of the system is represented by the state covariance matrix P. Of course, the estimated position and velocity of the target is also important for the tracking function of the radar, but in this context they play no role in the choice of waveforms. In a clutter rich (and varying) scenario, the estimate of the target parameters will clearly play a more important role. The expected information obtained from a measurement with such a waveform, given the current state of... 

In this example we will show the combined procedure. Let us take the simple serial system in Fig. 2 for which the available data is given in Table 1. Only total mass balances are considered and the covariance matrix is the identity matrix, that is, = I. 

In view of the aforementioned augmented problem, the error covariance matrix for the augmented system will be of the form... 

The system matrix, A, and target covariance matrix, i/, for this case are given in Section 10.3. The simulation condition is similar to the uncorrelated case the two cases, with and without outliers, are tested. 

The same problem discussed in Example 5.1 is taken to illustrate the ideas described in this section. The system consists of a chemical reactor with four streams, two entering and two leaving the process. All the stream flowrates are assumed to be measured, and their true values are x = [0.1739 5.0435 1.2175 4.00]T. The corresponding system matrix, A, and the covariance matrix, of the measurement... 

The generalized Fisher theorems derived in this section are statements about the space variation of the vectors of the relative and absolute space-specific rates of growth. These vectors have a simple natural (biological, chemical, physical) interpretation They express the capacity of a species of type u to fill out space in genetic language, they are space-specific fitness functions. In addition, the covariance matrix of the vector of the relative space-specific rates of growth, gap, [Eq. (25)] is a Riemannian metric tensor that enters the expression of a Fisher information metric [Eqs. (24) and (26)]. These results may serve as a basis for solving inverse problems for reaction transport systems. 

In order to characterize the interaction between different clusters, it is necessary to consider the mechanism of cluster identification during the process of the DA algorithm. As the temperature (Tk) is reduced after every iteration, the system undergoes a series of phase transitions (see (18) for details). In this annealing process, at high temperatures that are above a pre-computable critical value, all the lead compounds are located at the centroid of the entire descriptor space, thereby there is only one distinct location for the lead compounds. As the temperature is decreased, a critical temperature value is reached where a phase transition occurs, which results in a greater number of distinct locations for lead compounds and consequently finer clusters are formed. This provides us with a tool to control the number of clusters we want in our final selection. It is shown (18) for a square Euclidean distance d(xi,rj) = x, — rj that a cluster Rj splits at a critical temperature Tc when twice the maximum eigenvalue of the posterior covariance matrix, defined by Cx rj =... 

It first introduces the reader to the fundamentals of experimental design. Systems theory, response surface concepts, and basic statistics serve as a basis for the further development of matrix least squares and hypothesis testing. The effects of different experimental designs and different models on the variance-covariance matrix and on the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are extensively discussed. Applications and advanced topics such as confidence bands, rotatability, and confounding complete the text. Numerous worked examples are presented. 

It should be emphasized that for the Markovian copolymers, the knowledge of these structure parameters will suffice for finding the probabilities of any sequences LZ, i.e., for a comprehensive description of the structure of the chains of such copolymers at their given average composition. As for the CD of the Markovian copolymers, for any fraction of Z-mers it is described at Z 1 by the normal Gaussian distribution with covariance matrix, which is controlled along with Z only by the values of structure parameters (Lowry, 1970). The calculation of their dependence on time and on the kinetic parameters of a reaction system enables a complete statistical description of the chemical structure of a Markovian copolymer. It is obvious therewith to which extent a mathematical modeling of the processes of the synthesis of linear copolymers becomes simpler when the sequence of units in their macromolecules is known to obey Markov statistics. 

Experience has shown the covariance matrix 0rm to be conspicuously different when the same problem was treated by either the rs-method (without enforcing the first and second moment conditions) or any of the r0-derived methods. For the former method the errors of the coordinates were much less correlated. This, as well as the better condition number of the normal equation system, is no doubt a... 

A first PLS model was established from 124 reaction systems. To ensure that this set of reaction systems was not selected in such a way that the descriptor variables were correlated, a principal component analysis was made of the variation of the eight descriptors over the set. This analysis afforded eight significant principal components according to cross validation. This showed that the variance-covariance matrix of the descriptors was a full rank matrix and that there were no severe colinearities among the descriptors. 

Similar to the prior of the mean population parameter values, the prior for the between-subject variance can also be selected to have a more plausible range for PK/PD systems. If we consider the coefficient of variation of between-subject variability for most PK/PD parameters as being approximately <100%, then a choice of p for the Wishart distribution that provided a 97.5th percentile value of around this level would be biologically plausible. This is not quite as straightforward as for the precision of the population mean parameter values, since the minimum size of p is indexed to the minimum dimension of the variance-covariance matrix of between-subject effects, and p affects all variance parameters equally. The value of p required to provide a similar level of weak informativeness will vary with the dimension of the matrix. A series of simulations have been performed from the Wishart distribution, where the mean value of the variance of between-subject effects was set at 0.2. The value of p required to provide a similar level of weak informativeness will vary with the dimension of the matrix (Table 5.1). 

The idea here is to use the values for the thetas in the variance-covariance matrix of the estimate in the omega block, which are available in the NONMEM output file after a successful covariance step. It is necessary to use additive models for the rj values as well as adding an r/ on the parameter for the creatinine clearance relation theta(4). Note that the value in sigma is not used in the computations and can be set to anything. For further details of the code, please consult the NONMEM manuals and nmhelp (the online help system distributed with NONMEM). More precise reflections of the confidence and prediction intervals can be obtained by multiple simulations from the final model and suitable dosing/observation patterns followed by creation of piecewise prediction/confi-dence intervals from the simulated observations. 

Fisher suggested to transform the multivariate observations x to another coordinate system that enhances the separation of the samples belonging to each class tt [74]. Fisher s discriminant analysis (FDA) is optimal in terms of maximizing the separation among the set of classes. Suppose that there is a set of n = ni + U2 + + rig) m-dimensional (number of process variables) samples xi, , x belonging to classes tt, i = 1, , g. The total scatter of data points (St) consists of two types of scatter, within-class scatter Sw and hetween-class scatter Sb- The objective of the transformation proposed by Fisher is to maximize S while minimizing Sw Fisher s approach does not require that the populations have Normal distributions, but it implicitly assumes that the population covariance matrices are equal, because a pooled estimate of the common covariance matrix (S ) is used (Eq. 3.45). 

Equation (209) shows that the coupled system turns out in a two-mode squeezed state at t > 0. The properties of this state, as well as of any Gaussian state are determined completely by its covariance matrix... 

It is clear that the density matrix of the probe oscillator [which is obtained from the density matrix of the total system p(Q, q ff, q ) = /(<2, q) Q, cf) by putting Q = Q and integrating over Q also has the Gaussian form. Its properties are determined completely by the reduced covariance matrix (it inadvertently coincides with Mxx when co0 = 1) ... 

Figure 9.8 Scatter plot of creatinine clearance against the empirical Bayes estimate for tobramycin systemic clearance under the 2-compartment model with reduced unstructured covariance matrix. Solid line is the LOESS smoother with 0.3 sampling proportion.

The left-hand side of the last equation involves the variance-covariance matrix of the observed distribution of structural parameters, and the right-hand side involves the compliance matrix C = for the system in question as well as second-moment matrix of the distribution of perturbing forces. This model provides a conceptual basis for relating observed distributions P x -xo) to the energy surfaces associated with small x, but its actual application is beset with obstacles. 

---