SWNTs nanotubes

Adopting the approach of increasing the adsorption enthalpy for graphites should have a similar effect for SWNTs, and also have the effect of increasing the surface area of SWNTs. Nanotubes typically form rope structures due to van der Waals interactions which promote rope formation, limiting the surface area to -300 m /gm (interior and exterior surface areas for a SWNT material should be above 2,600 m /gm). Potassium intercalation of SWNTs will separate the individual tubes. Computational work on SWNTs shows that under certain conditions, increasing the van der Waals gap will increase the amount of hydrogen that can be adsorbed [5]. 

Fig. 23. Experimental room temperature Raman spectrum from a sample consisting primarily of bundles or ropes of single-wall nanotubes with diameters near that of the (10,10) nanotube. The excitation laser wavelength is 514.5 nm. The inset shows the lineshape analysis of the vibrational modes near 1580 cm . SWNT refers to singlewall carbon nanotubes [195].

The yield strengths of defect-free SWNTs may be higher than that measured for Bacon s scroll structures, and measurements on defect-free carbon nanotubes may allow the prediction of the yield strength of a single, defect-free graphene sheet. Also, the yield strengths of MWNTs are subject to the same limitations discussed above with respect to tube slippage. All the discussion here relates to ideal nanotubes real carbon nanotubes may contain faults of various types that will influence their properties and require experimental measurements of their mechanical constants. 

Work on the production and oxidation of SWNT samples at SRI and other laboratories has led to the observation of very long bundles of these tubes, as can be seen in Fig. 2. In the cleanup and removal of the amorphous carbon in the original sample, the SWNTs self-assemble into aligned cable structures due to van der Waals forces. These structures are akin to the SW nanotube crystals discussed by Tersoff and Ruoff they show that van der Waals forces can flatten tubes of diameter larger than 2.5 nm into a hexagonal cross-sectional lattice or honeycomb structure[17]. 

Recently, TsHs has been encapsulated within single-walled (SWNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) with internal diameters of 0.8-8 nm. It was shown that the best results were obtained when the internal diameters (1.4—1.5 nm for SWNTs and 1.0-3.0 nm for MWNTs) slightly exceeded the diameter of TsHs (1.2 nm). T8H8 was introduced in the gas phase and reacted with the nanotubes through van der Waals interactions. ... 

In the near future, the possible synthesis of nanotubes with solid-gas potential will be more favorable to adsorption. The effect of hydrogen overpressure on the stability of adsorbed Ha needs to be verified in the near future. The high-purity nanotube produced by laser vaporization, catalytic decomposition, or other techniques should be investigated. It is noteworthy that the synthesis of the SWNT with defined diameters and distances between the walls is difficult to perform at present, but future synthesis routes will allow more... 

Since the discovery of SWNTs, they have been expected to become the building blocks of the next generation of functional nanomaterials. However, their strong cohesive property and poor solubility have restricted the use of SWNTs for fundamental and applied research fields. One method to overcome these problems is to make the SWNTs more soluble by wrapping them with polymers [31]. At the same time, the fabrication of high-performance carbon nanotube (CNT)-based composites is driven by the ability to create anisotropy at the molecular level to obtain appropriate functions. 

Formation of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) was found to be catalyzed by metal nanoparticles [207]. Wang et al. [114] investigated bimetallic catalysts such as FeRu and FePt in the size range of 0.5-3 nm for the efficient growth of SWNTs on flat surfaces. When compared with single-component catalysts such as Fe, Ru, and Pt of similar size, bimetallic catalysts Fe/Ru and Fe/Pt produced at least 200% more SWNTs [114]. 

Only a few in vivo dermal toxicity studies have been reported so far. Huczko and Lange [50] evaluated the potential of raw CNTs to induce skin irritation by conducting two routine dermatological tests (patch test on 40 volunteers with allergy susceptibilities and Draize rabbit eye test on four albino rabbits). Koyama etal. [51] showed the biological responses to four different types of carbon nanotubes (SWNTs, two types of MWNTs with different diameters, and cup-stacked carbon nanotubes) after their subcutaneous implantation in mice. Both tests [50, 51] showed no or poor irritation effects. However, the in vitro studies in epidermal cell lines exposed to CNTs, and also a more recent report on the toxic outcomes of topical exposure of mice to SWNTs [46], have raised concerns over these assessments. Clearly, this is an area requiring further scientific evaluation. 

Table 7.2 Summary of in vitro toxicity outcomes after exposure to CNTs. The term CNTs indicates that the material was not identified as single- (SWNTs) or multi-walled (MWNTs) carbon nanotubes. Percentage of catalytically active transition metals in the CNTs is reported when indicated by the authors. 

Single-walled carbon nanotubes SWNT anion intercalation. 

Since their first discovery by Iijima in 1991 [1], carbon nanotubes have attracted a great deal of interest due to their very exciting properties. Their structure is characterized by cylindrically shaped enclosed graphene layers that can form co-axially stacked multi-wall nanotubes (MWNTs) or single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs). Like in graphite, carbon atoms are strongly bonded to each other in the curved honeycomb network but have much weaker Van der Waals-type interaction with carbons belonging to... 

---