Surface waters dilution

As groundwater discharge is almost the only sustainable source of surface waters, dilution cannot be accounted for, but due to nitrate degrading processes at different interfaces an attenuation factor of 0.5 was established. However, despite this natural breakdown it was proved that, specifically at the Odense river basin, the generic Environmental Quality Standard for nitrates of 50mg/l is not protective to aquatic ecosystems. Specifically for this groundwater body and its interactions with surface water, a ninate threshold value less than 20 mg/1 would be necessary to decrease the nutrient load to an acceptable level. 

For MPN determination, sterile pipettes calibrated in 0.1-ml increments are used. Other equipment includes sterile screw-top dilution bottles containing 99 ml of water and a rack containing six sets of five lactose broth fermentation tubes. A sterile pipette is used to transfer 1.0-ml portions of the sample into each of five fermentation tubes. This is followed by dispensing 0.1 ml into a second set of five. For the next higher dilution (the third), only 0.01 ml of sample water is required. This small quantity is very difficult to pipette accurately, so 1.0 ml of sample is placed in a dilution bottle containing 99 ml of sterile water and mixed. The 1.0-ml portions containing 0.01 ml of the surface water sample are then pipetted into the third set of five tubes. The fourth set receives 0.1 ml from this same dilution bottle. The process is then carried one more step by transferring 1.0 ml from the first dilution bottle into 99 ml of water in the second for another hundredfold dilution. Portions from this dilution bottle are pipetted into the fifth and sixth tube sets. After incubation (48 h at 35 C), the tubes are examined for gas production and the number of positive reactions for each of the serial dilutions is recorded. 

Parker, F. L., Churchill, M. A., Andrew, R. W., Frederick, B. J., Carrigan, P. H. Jr., Cragwall, J. S. Jr., Jones, S. L., Struxness, E. G. and Morton, R. J. (1966). Dilution, dispersion and mass transport of radionuclides in the Clinch-Tennessee Rivers, page 35 in Disposal of Radioactive Wastes into Seas, Oceans and Surface Waters, IAEA Publication No. STI/PUB/126 (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna). 

Ca and SO4 contents in surface waters from the Ebro Basin also show large variations (both between 0.5 and 7 mmol L-1) and plot below the seawater dilution line in an SO4 versus Ca diagram (Fig. 8). There is a clear evolution of the Ca and S04 contents along the Ebro from up to downstream, with decreasing Ca/S04 molar ratios mean values from 2.19 0.70 in Mendavia to 1.28 0.49 in Sastago and finally a slight increase (1.40 0.33) in Tortosa. In the middle part of the basin, for... 

Some studies have also reported PBDE levels in sediments collected near industry facilities. Sellstrom et al. [29] reported total PBDE concentration levels between nd and 364 ng/g dw (nd-360 ng/g dw for BDE-209) in river sediments from a Swedish river with numerous textile industries. Higher PBDE levels up to 1,400 ng/g dw (nd-399 ng/g dw for BDE-209) were found downstream from a foam manufacturing plant using PBDEs in the United Kingdom [31]. BDE-209 burdens up to 4,600 ng/g dw have also been reported on suspended particulates from Dutch surface waters, decreasing with distance from a textile facility [42]. Our PBDE results were considerably higher than those reported for sediments collected near industrial areas, probably because of the small dilution factor of the Vero River at this area, which has an average flow of 2.1 m3/s. 

Waters in fig. 4 that are substantially below the general trend are dilute surface waters that have not mixed with acid waters. 

Surface waters parallel the observed trends for ground waters. However, for both sites anion and cation abundances are typically lower, and likely reflect dilution from surface run-off and precipitation. 

Median concentrations for parameters that were significantly (p=0.95) different between the background and mineralized surface water samples are presented in Table 2 under the surface water heading. There are fewer significant differences between surface water compared to ground water parameters. Be, Co, and Pb are anomalous in ground but not in surface water. This may simply be due to dilution by runoff. Both the SQFP multielement suite associated with natural ARD and the high Mo concentrations associated with mineralization clearly persist into surface water. 

Hexachloroethane released to water or soil may volatilize into air or adsorb onto soil and sediments. Volatilization appears to be the major removal mechanism for hexachloroethane in surface waters (Howard 1989). The volatilization rate from aquatic systems depends on specific conditions, including adsorption to sediments, temperature, agitation, and air flow rate. Volatilization is expected to be rapid from turbulent shallow water, with a half-life of about 70 hours in a 2 m deep water body (Spanggord et al. 1985). A volatilization half-life of 15 hours for hexachloroethane in a model river 1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec with a wind speed of 3 m/sec was calculated (Howard 1989). Measured half-lives of 40.7 and 45 minutes for hexachloroethane volatilization from dilute solutions at 25 C in a beaker 6.5 cm deep, stirred at 200 rpm, were reported (Dilling 1977 Dilling et al. 1975). Removal of 90% of the hexachloroethane required more than 120 minutes (Dilling et al. 1975). The relationship of these laboratory data to volatilization rates from natural waters is not clear (Callahan et al. 1979). 

In this work, the column performances were examined by supplying 1 mM of arsenic species, which corresponds to 75 ppm of arsenic. Such a high level arsenic is rarely found in surface water. Since the highest concentration levels of arsenic in well water of Ganges Delta are ca. 2 ppm. Thus, the removal of arsenic form dilute arsenite solutions was tested. Figure 5 illustratively shows the results. 

Experiments—Verify Beer s law by wrapping two test tubes in black paper, pouring the same volume (1-2 c.c.) of a dilute solution of a dye into each, and checking the equality of colour by looking down both tubes against a white surface. Then dilute the contents of one tube with 5-10 c.c. of water and again compare their colour. 

At present, isotope-dilution mass spectrometry provides the best method to certify iron concentration in the recommended deep-water reference material (an expected iron concentration of approximately 0.7 nM) and to obtain an information value for iron in the recommended surface water reference material (an expected iron concentration of approximately 50 pM or less). 

Abstract This chapter discusses disposal to surface water, the most common method of concentrate management. This includes concentrate that is directly disposed of into rivers, creeks, lakes, oceans, bays, and other bodies of water. Concentrate is piped to the site of disposal, where it is discharged to the receiving body of water via an outfall structure. The environmental impacts of surface water disposal may be lessened by diluting the concentrate prior to discharge, or by dilution of the concentrate through the design of the outfall strucmre and diffusers. Pretreatment processes that lessen the impact on the environment should also be considered. 

Surface Water. In canal water, the initial acrolein concentration of 100 pg/L was reduced to 90, 50 and 30 pg/L at 5, 10, and 15 miles downstream. No explanation was given for the decrease in concentration, e.g., volatilization, chemical hydrolysis, dilution, etc. (Bartley and Gangstad, 1974). 

Many surface waters are extremely dilute (low tens of pS/cm). The lowest specific conductance values are from ponds peripheral to or outside the deposit area. Samples with specific conductance above 89 pS/cm (upper quartile) are from ponds and ground waters within or close to the deposit area. The highest values are from borehole seeps that probably reflect a deeper ground water source. 

---