Surface tension method drop pressure

A number of methods are available for the measurement of surface and interfacial tension of liquid systems. Surface tension of liquids is determined by static and dynamic surface tension methods. Static surface tension characterises the surface tension of the liquid in equilibrium and the commonly used measurement methods are Du Notiy ring, Wilhelmy plate, spinning drop and pendant drop. Dynamic surface tension determines the surface tension as a function of time and the bubble pressure method is the most common method used for its determination. 

NMR, up to 180 °C by Shinoda et al. [52]. Some work has been reported involving erne determination by calorimetry (measuring heats of dilntion or specific heats). Archer et al. [53] nsed flow calorimetry to determine the erne s of several sulfonate surfactants at up to 178 °C. NoU [5J] determined erne s for dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide and commercial surfactants in the temperature range 25—200 °C using flow calorimetry. Surface tension is the classical method for determining erne s but many surface tension methods are not suitable for use with aqueous solutions at elevated temperatures. Exceptions include the pendant, sessile, and captive drop methods which can be conducted with high-pressure cells [54, 55]. 

The film pressure is defined as the difference between the surface tension of the pure fluid and that of the film-covered surface. While any method of surface tension measurement can be used, most of the methods of capillarity are, for one reason or another, ill-suited for work with film-covered surfaces with the principal exceptions of the Wilhelmy slide method (Section II-6) and the pendant drop experiment (Section II-7). Both approaches work very well with fluid films and are capable of measuring low values of pressure with similar precision of 0.01 dyn/cm. In addition, the film balance, considerably updated since Langmuir s design (see Section III-7) is a popular approach to measurement of V. 

Surface tension of the nonpolarized ITIES was investigated by using the drop-weight [2,3,29], maximum bubble pressure [30] and pendant drop [4] methods. The latter method... 

The surface tension of mercury in the presence of the vapour at various partial pressures was measured by the drop weight method. The following values were obtained for the surface tensions of mercury in the presence of vapours of methyl acetate, water and benzene at various partial pressures at 26 —27° C. 

The profiles of pendant and sessile bubbles and drops are commonly used in determinations of surface and interfacial tensions and of contact angles. Such methods are possible because the interfaces of static fluid particles must be at equilibrium with respect to hydrostatic pressure gradients and increments in normal stress due to surface tension at a curved interface (see Chapter 1). It is simple to show that at any point on the surface... 

There are numerous other methods for measuring surface tension that we do not discuss here. These include (a) the measurement of the maximum pressure beyond which an inert gas bubble formed at the tip of a capillary immersed in a liquid breaks away from the tip (the so-called maximum bubble-pressure method) (b) the so-called drop-weight method, in which drops of a liquid (in a gas or in another liquid) formed at the tip of a capillary are collected and weighed and (c) the ring method, in which the force required to detach a ring or a loop of wire is measured. In all these cases, the measured quantities can be related to the surface tension of the liquid through simple equations. The basic concepts involved in these methods do not differ significantly from what we cover in this chapter. The experimental details may be obtained from Adamson (1990). 

Figure D3.5.6 Adsorption kinetics of a small molecule surfactant. Surface tension of polyoxyethylene (10) lauryl ether (Brij) at the air-water interface decreases as time of adsorption increases. Brij concentration is 0.1 g/liter, as measured by the drop volume technique and the maximum bubble pressure method (UNITD3.6).

Joos, P. and Rillaerts, E. 1981. Theory on the determination of dynamic surface tension with the drop volume and maximum bubble pressure method. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 79 96-100. 

Provides measuring techniques of contact angle, surface tension, interfacial tension, and bubble pressure. Suitable methods for both static and dynamic inteifacial tension of liquids include du Nous ring, Wilhelmy plate, spinning drop, pendant drop, bubble pressure, and drop volume techniques. Methods for solids include sessile drop, dynamic Wilhelmy, single fiber, and powder contact angle techniques. 

Figure 2.9 Maximal bubble pressure and drop-weight method to measure the surface tension of liquids.

Fundamental knowledge about the behavior of charged surfaces comes from experiments with mercury. How can an electrocapillarity curve of mercury be measured A usual arrangement, the so-called dropping mercury electrode, is shown in Fig. 5.2 [70], A capillary filled with mercury and a counter electrode are placed into an electrolyte solution. A voltage is applied between both. The surface tension of mercury is determined by the maximum bubble pressure method. Mercury is thereby pressed into the electrolyte solution under constant pressure P. The number of drops per unit time is measured as a function of the applied voltage. 

For foams, it is the surface tension of the foaming solution that is usually of most interest. For this, the most commonly used methods are the du Noiiy ring, Wilhelmy plate, drop weight or volume, pendant drop, and the maximum bubble pressure method. For suspensions it is again usually the surface tension of the continuous phase that is of most interest, with the same methods being used in most cases. Some work has also been done on the surface tension of the overall suspension itself using, for example, the du Noiiy ring and maximum bubble pressure methods (see Section 3.2.4). 

Hogness,1 Burdon,2 Bircumshaw, and Sauerwald have done a great deal to render accurate measurements possible the best method is probably the maximum bubble pressure method, but the measurement of sessile drops (see Chap. IX), and of drop volumes, are also useful. Metals always have a very high surface tension. Table X gives typical results. 

There are static and dynamic methods. The static methods measure the tension of practically stationary surfaces which have been formed for an appreciable time, and depend on one of two principles. The most accurate depend on the pressure difference set up on the two sides of a curved surface possessing surface tension (Chap. I, 10), and are often only devices for the determination of hydrostatic pressure at a prescribed curvature of the liquid these include the capillary height method, with its numerous variants, the maximum bubble pressure method, the drop-weight method, and the method of sessile drops. The second principle, less accurate, but very often convenient because of its rapidity, is the formation of a film of the liquid and its extension by means of a support caused to adhere to the liquid temporarily methods in this class include the detachment of a ring or plate from the surface of any liquid, and the measurement of the tension of soap solutions by extending a film. 

Measurements on molten metals. The maximum bubble pressure method has proved one of the most satisfactory, but sessile drops, and drop-volumes have also been used with success.2 The principal difficulty lies in the proneness of metals to form skins of oxides, or other compounds, on their surfaces and these are sure to reduce the surface tension. Unless work is conducted in a very high vacuum, a freshly formed surface is almost a necessity if the sessile bubble method is used, the course of formation of a surface layer may, if great precautions are taken, be traced by the alteration in surface tension. Another difficulty lies in the high contact angles formed by liquid metals with almost all non-metallic surfaces, which are due to the very high cohesion of metals compared with their adhesion to other substances. 

A variant is the micro-pipette method, which is also similar to the maximum bubble pressure technique. A drop of the liquid to be studied is drawn by suction into the tip of a micropipette. The inner diameter of the pipette must be smaller than the radius of the drop the minimum suction pressure needed to force the droplet into the capillary can be related to the surface tension of the liquid, using the Young-Laplace equation [1.1.212). This technique can also be used to obtain interfacial tensions, say of individual emulsion droplets. Experimental problems include accounting for the extent of wetting of the inner lumen of the capillary, rate problems because of the time-dependence of surfactant (if any) adsorption on the capillary and, for narrow capillaries accounting for the work needed to bend the interface. Indeed, this method has also been used to measure bending moduli (sec. 1.15). 

Table 1.2. Surface tensions of water in mN m , obtained by various investigations using different techniques. Temperatures in degrees Celsius. Abbreviations for methods CR = capillary rise, WP = Wilhelmy plate, DNR = Du Nouy ring, DM = other detachment method or object in the surface. HD = hanging (pendent) drop, SD = sessile drop, MBP = maximum bubble pressure DW = drop weight.

---