Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface Raman monolayer

Recent developments in Raman equipment has led to a considerable increase in sensitivity. This has enabled the monitoring of reactions of organic monolayers on glassy carbon [4.292] and diamond surfaces and analysis of the structure of Lang-muir-Blodgett monolayers without any enhancement effects. Although this unenhanced surface-Raman spectroscopy is expected to be applicable to a variety of technically or scientifically important surfaces and interfaces, it nevertheless requires careful optimization of the apparatus, data treatment, and sample preparation. [Pg.260]

Bryant MA, Pemberton JE. Surface Raman-scattering of self-assembled monolayers formed from 1-atkanethiols - behavior of films at Au and comparison to films at Ag. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1991, 113, 8284—8293. [Pg.443]

Since Raman intensity is proportional to path length [Eq. (2.19)], the very thin samples encountered in surface Raman are expected to yield very weak Raman intensities. A typical molecular monolayer is 10 A thick, corresponding to a path length of 10 pm or 10 cm. A typical path length for a clear sample and 180° sampling (Fig. 6.13) is at least 100 pm, so the... [Pg.373]

Raman spectra of monolayers were first obtained on roughened silver surfaces that exhibit strong field enhancement, since the scanning/photomultiplier tube spectrometers of the time needed the gain in sensitivity of a factor of to provide useful spectra (3,4). Multichannel spectrometers permitted spectrum acquisition without field enhancement about 8 years later (12), for the reasons discussed in Section 13.2. Surface Raman without field enhancement is conceptually simpler, so it will be discussed first. Section 13.5 describes the requirements and additional benefits when field enhancement occurs. [Pg.382]

An early example of surface Raman without field enhancement is shown in Figure 13.7. This measurement predated the development of CCD detectors and represents a major achievement in terms of sensitivity (12). The adsorption of nitrobenzene on a well-defined nickel surface was carried out in UHV then Raman scattering was observed with a single spectrograph and an intensified Vidicon detector. Unenhanced spectra were obtained from 7.5 x lO molecules cm of nitrobenzene (1.1 x 10 " mol cm ), corresponding to a submonolayer. Examples of surface Raman spectroscopy with resonance enhancement include monolayers of phthalocyanines on gold (17) and ordered graphite (18), and multilayers of metalloporphyrins (19). [Pg.384]

Fig. IV-14. Resonance Raman Spectra for cetyl orange using 457.9-nm excitation. [From T. Takenaka and H. Fukuzaki, Resonance Raman Spectra of Insoluble Monolayers Spread on a Water Surface, J. Raman Spectr., 8, 151 (1979) (Ref. 157). Copyright Heyden and Son, Ltd., 1979 reprinted by permission of John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.]... Fig. IV-14. Resonance Raman Spectra for cetyl orange using 457.9-nm excitation. [From T. Takenaka and H. Fukuzaki, Resonance Raman Spectra of Insoluble Monolayers Spread on a Water Surface, J. Raman Spectr., 8, 151 (1979) (Ref. 157). Copyright Heyden and Son, Ltd., 1979 reprinted by permission of John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.]...
Freunscht P, Van Duyne R P and Schneider S 1997 Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of trans-stilbene adsorbed on platinum- or self-assembled monolayer-modified silver film over nanosphere surfaces Chem. Phys. Lett. 281 372-8... [Pg.1228]

Intensity enhancement takes place on rough silver surfaces. Under such conditions, Raman scattering can be measured from monolayers of molecular substances adsorbed on the silver (pyridine was the original test case), a technique known as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. More recendy it has been found that sur-fiice enhancement also occurs when a thin layer of silver is sputtered onto a solid sample and the Raman scattering is observed through the silver. [Pg.434]

Nitrophenyl groups covalently bonded to classy carbon and graphite surfaces have been detected and characterized by unenhanced Raman spectroscopy in combination with voltammetry and XPS [4.292]. Difference spectra from glassy carbon with and without nitrophenyl modification contained several Raman bands from the nitrophenyl group with a comparatively large signal-to-noise ratio (Fig. 4.58). Electrochemical modification of the adsorbed monolayer was observed spectrally, because this led to clear changes in the Raman spectrum. [Pg.260]

Raman spectroscopy has provided information on catalytically active transition metal oxide species (e. g. V, Nb, Cr, Mo, W, and Re) present on the surface of different oxide supports (e.g. alumina, titania, zirconia, niobia, and silica). The structures of the surface metal oxide species were reflected in the terminal M=0 and bridging M-O-M vibrations. The location of the surface metal oxide species on the oxide supports was determined by monitoring the specific surface hydroxyls of the support that were being titrated. The surface coverage of the metal oxide species on the oxide supports could be quantitatively obtained, because at monolayer coverage all the reactive surface hydroxyls were titrated and additional metal oxide resulted in the formation of crystalline metal oxide particles. The nature of surface Lewis and Bronsted acid sites in supported metal oxide catalysts has been determined by adsorbing probe mole-... [Pg.261]

Pettinger et al. observed a TERS spectrum of monolayer-thick brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) adsorbed on a smooth Au film surface by using a Ag tip, while no STM image of the adsorbed surface was shovm [23]. The Raman intensity increased when the tip was in the tunneling position, meaning that the tip-surface distance was around 1 nm. They calculated the field enhancement factor by the method described by... [Pg.8]

Ren et al. reported a method to prepare a gold tip with a tip apex radius of 30 nm reproducibly [27]. They observed the TERS of a Malachite Green isothiocyanate (MGITC) monolayer on an Au(lll) surface and obtained an enhancement factor of about 1.6 X 10, by using the relation, q= /TERs/lRRs=g /l focus where q is the net increase in the signal. Iters snd rrs the signal intensities for TERS and RRS (resonance Raman scattering), respectively is the TERS enhancement (gis the field enhancement), a denotes the radius of the enhanced field, and Rfocus the radius of the laser focus. [Pg.10]


See other pages where Surface Raman monolayer is mentioned: [Pg.304]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.5660]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.1613]    [Pg.1616]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.1264]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.941]    [Pg.118]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Raman surface

Surface monolayer

© 2024 chempedia.info