Surface free energy distribution

For a nematic LC, the preferred orientation is one in which the director is parallel everywhere. Other orientations have a free-energy distribution that depends on the elastic constants, K /. The orientational elastic constants K, K22 and K33 determine respectively splay, twist and bend deformations. Values of elastic constants in LCs are around 10 N so that free-energy difference between different orientations is of the order of 5 x 10 J m the same order of magnitude as surface energy. A thin layer of LC sandwiched between two aligned surfaces therefore adopts an orientation determined by the surfaces. This fact forms the basis of most electrooptical effects in LCs. Display devices based on LCs are discussed in Chapter 7. 

Process ability Surface area, surface free energy, crystal defects, and deformation potential affect compressibility and machineability on high-speed tableting machines with reduced compression dwell times Particle size distribution and shape affect flow properties, efficiency of dry mixing process, and segregation potential Compressibility, flow ability, and dilution potential affect the choice of direct compression as a manufacturing process... 

The basic driving force for microdomain formation in block copolymers is the reduction in the positive surface free energy of the system resulting from the increase of the domain size. This domain size increase gives rise to a decrease in the volume fraction of interfacial region in which junction points of the copolymers must be distributed. In addition, configurations of the block chains must also change in order to even-up the density deficiency in the interior of the domains. 

The mechanistic implications of the GPLE have been only partially discussed. Standard models cannot be used to justify the use of a steady-state distribution because they were developed using only aggregation kernels. However, there is no fundamental reason why steady-state configurations do not exist as shown by Puentes and Gamas [6] based on an analysis of the surface free energy corresponding to a crystallite distribution. 

A more precise picture of an SLP distribution in a porous network raises serious theoretical problems because of the difficulty in defining analytically the pore structure. Thermodynamically the total-surface free energy is compounded from contributions from three interfaces (19), where A is the total support... 

Surface properties surface free energy, crystal habit, surface area, particle size distribution... 

The evolution of the surface free energy components of the different samples showed that the physicochemical surface characteristics of silicas and their surface heterogeneity are dependent on the mode of preparation. An approximation of surface heterogeneity was attained by calculation of the distribution function of the energy of adsorption of alkane probes on the solid surfaces. 

The pore size distribution can be obtained from capillary pressure measurements or mercury porosimetry. The capillary pressure is related to the specific free energies of the interface between fluids and between the fluid and the capillary wall. At mechanical equilibrium, the surface free energy between the fluids is a minimum. The equilibrium condition is expressed by the Laplace equation ... 

The point here is that the surfaces of solids actually dealt with usually cannot be considered to be equilibrium ones. Even if crystalline, they will not usually display those faces demanded by the macroscopic minimizing of surface free energy [23]. Further, one expects for the equilibrium surface an optimization of the thermodynamic combination of entropy and energy, and hence a distribution of imperfections, surface waves and humps [33], etc. Most solids are incapable of adjusting to such equilibrium conformations and in practice their surface structure will be largely a frozen-in record of an arbitrary past history. 

---