Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface effects, separation

See 2-3.1. Electrical conduction through solids takes place both through the bulk material and over the surface. In most cases surfaces have different physical and chemical properties than the bulk, for example due to contamination or moisture. Volume and surface resistivity can be separately measured for solid materials such as antistatic plastic sheet. Powders represent a special case since although both surface and bulk conduction occur, their contributions cannot be individually measured and the volume or bulk resistivity of a powder includes surface effects. [Pg.64]

Current use of statistical thermodynamics implies that the adsorption system can be effectively separated into the gas phase and the adsorbed phase, which means that the partition function of motions normal to the surface can be represented with sufficient accuracy by that of oscillators confined to the surface. This becomes less valid, the shorter is the mean adsorption time of adatoms, i.e. the higher is the desorption temperature. Thus, near the end of the desorption experiment, especially with high heating rates, another treatment of equilibria should be used, dealing with the whole system as a single phase, the adsorbent being a boundary. This is the approach of the gas-surface virial expansion of adsorption isotherms (51, 53) or of some more general treatment of this kind. [Pg.350]

Fig. 28—Different stages in transition of lubrication regimes, (a) Full-film lubrication with film thickness much larger than roughness h/cr> ). (b) Surfaces are separated but roughness effect becomes significant (5>/i/cr>3). (c) Asperities interfere with each other but hydrodynamic films carry the most load (h/cr 3). (d) Typical mixed lubrication with load shared by lubrication and asperity (h/cr<3). (e) Boundary lubrication when asperities carry the most part of load (h/a-<0.S). Fig. 28—Different stages in transition of lubrication regimes, (a) Full-film lubrication with film thickness much larger than roughness h/cr> ). (b) Surfaces are separated but roughness effect becomes significant (5>/i/cr>3). (c) Asperities interfere with each other but hydrodynamic films carry the most load (h/cr 3). (d) Typical mixed lubrication with load shared by lubrication and asperity (h/cr<3). (e) Boundary lubrication when asperities carry the most part of load (h/a-<0.S).
High polarity is one of the reasons why both the ionic and amphoteric surfactants, and especially their metabolites, are difficult to detect. This property, however, is important for the application tasks of surface-active compounds, but is also the reason for their high water solubility. Due to this fact, their extraction and concentration from the water phase, which can be carried out in a number of very different ways, is not always straightforward. Furthermore, they are often not volatile without decomposition, which thus prevents application of gas chromatographic (GC) separation techniques combined with appropriate detection. This very effective separation method in environmental analysis is thus applicable only for short-chain surfactants and their metabolites following derivatisation of the various polar groups in order to improve their volatility. [Pg.24]

A sharp decrease in adsorption enthalpy between 10 and 30% surface coverage of SAL can also be seen in Figure 2. This decrease may indicate that only a small number of surface sites are favorably oriented for SAL-goethite bond formation, although possible SAL-SAL interactions on the surface may also have an effect. Separate measurements of SAL adsorption on goethite, gave relatively small adsorption maxima (when compared to the phosphate and fluoride adsorption maxima discussed above) of 22 and 11 pmol/g at pH 4.8 and 6.3, respectively, in either 0.001 M NaN0 or 0.001 M KC1 06). J... [Pg.148]

Pugnaloni, L.A., Ettelaie, R., Dickinson, E. (2004). Surface phase separation in complex mixed adsorbing systems an interface-bulk coupling effect. Journal of Chemical Physics, 121,3775-3783. [Pg.310]

That these different compounds produce the same effect at so nearly the same concentration argues that the principal cause of the effect is electrostatic. Use the average of these concentrations to calculate (a) the value of k at which this system coagulates, (b) the force of repulsion (Equation (82)), and (c) the potential energy of repulsion (Equation (86)) when two planar surfaces are separated by a distance of 10 nm. For the purpose of calculation in parts (b) and (c), i/ o may be taken as 100 mV. Comment on the applicability of these equations to the physical system under consideration. [Pg.533]

MackorJ used the model outlined in Example 13.6 to derive the expression AGR = NkBT( — d/L) for the repulsion per unit area of particles carrying N rods of length L when the surfaces are separated by a distance d. Assuming this repulsion equals the van der Waals attraction when the particle separation is 1.5 nm, calculate the effective Hamaker constant in this system if L = 2.5 nm. Select a reasonable value for Win this calculation and justify your choice. [Pg.624]

The dramatically higher surface area of mesoporous silica in comparison to commercially available chromatographic grade silica enhances resolution of molecules by increasing capacity factors to allow effective separations of analytes. In this report, we illustrate the use of these types of silica in normal phase HPLC, reverse phase HPLC, and chiral HPLC. [Pg.747]

A precondition for the investigation of deformation of a I.c. in an external field is a uniform alignment of the I.c. with respect to the measuring cell, in order to get quantitative informations. Normally the I.c. is aligned by surface effects in the measuring cell, which usually consists of two glass plates separated by a distance of about 10 pm. We will consider three principal modes of alignment of the I.c. (Fig. 16) ... [Pg.126]

If the amphiphile is significantly soluble in the liquid, we cannot use a Langmuir trough any longer because amphiphiles would diffuse via the liquid phase to both sides of the barrier. We can use a PLAWM1 trough instead [577, 578], In the PLAWM trough a flexible membrane, which is fixed to the barrier, separates the two compartments. This membrane is easily movable, so that the barrier position is affected only by surface effects. [Pg.282]

The comparison of the surface structures on two substrates suggests strong surface effects on the microphase separation. For lamella systems, the degree of interfacial segregation has been shown to be proportional to the surface potential [146], The same line of argument can be used to explain the surface field effects... [Pg.51]


See other pages where Surface effects, separation is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.1155]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.264]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.146 ]




SEARCH



Separators effects

© 2024 chempedia.info