Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface destruction

The model proposed by Bowden and Tabor has been regarded as the most successful one for presenting a simple and logical theory capable of explaining the Amontons friction law. However, suspicions concerning the two fundamental assumptions in the model were gradually aroused over past years. Friction has been attributed, in Bowden and Tabor s model, to the adhesion between asperities in contact and torn-off of the adhesive junctions when the shear stress exceeds a critical value. This implies that plastic flow and surface destruction may occur at the moment of slip, and that friction is dominated by the shear strength of the adhesive conjunctions, which is material dependent. [Pg.171]

Collapsible reaction chambers As a result of these problems, larger smog chambers with surfaces thought to be relatively inert have found increasing use. Thus conditioned FEP Teflon films, for example, have been shown to have relatively low rates of surface destruction of a variety of reactive species. In addition, they typically transmit solar radiation in the 290- to 800-nm region (Fig. 16.1) and have low rates of hydrocarbon offgassing. [Pg.873]

Surface destructive alterations around the action site of the indenter are used to determine the degree of brittleness of a material (Section 6.3). They are the outcome of a destructive deformation of the crystal induced by multidirectional shear forces released in the crystal structure. The shear stresses liberated in static indenter tests are significantly in excess of those registered under other methods, being of the order of 50 MPa (Yushkin,... [Pg.261]

Ozone absorbs uv radiation from 200 to 360 nm. This leads partly to a reversal of reaction 11-2 and thus a steady state concentration is established. The net result of all these processes is absorption and conversion to heat of considerable solar uv radiation that would otherwise strike the earth s surface. Destruction of any signifi-... [Pg.453]

It is convenient to express the surface rate of chain breaking as equal to a surface destruction rate coefficient fe multiplied by the concentration of chain carriers, n. Assuming only first order reactions of the centres in the gas phase also, the rate of development of centre concentration is given by... [Pg.25]

Values of the uj, dj and i// for various values of B/p are given for both cylindrical and spherical vessels in Table 10. If B/p is small the surface destruction is effectively determined by diffusion while for large B/p the... [Pg.27]

The two types of behaviour discussed earlier with respect to surface destruction efficiency are well illustrated at the first limit by the results under the conditions of Hinshelwood and Moelwyn-Hughes [13] (high e) on the one hand, and of Semenova [16] (low e) on the other. The contrasting effects of inert gases in the two types of vessel are shown in Tables 3 and 4. At the first limit the surface destruction refers to removal of H, OH and O. [Pg.33]

Taking reactions (i)—(v), together with the surface destruction of H and O atoms, the stationary state treatment gives the complete first and second limit explosion boundary as... [Pg.34]

Kurzius and Boudart [58] have adopted the same approach as above specifically for the determination of fej by measuring first limits for mixtures of composition 2H2 + O2 and 9H2 + O2 in a 10.2 cm diameter vessel coated with magnesium oxide. Their analysis considered only reactions (i)—(iii) and the surface destruction of H atoms, for which they assumed the surface to have unit efficiency (the results for the two compositions studied seemed to support this). On this basis, however, their results do not appear to be completely consistent with those of Baldwin. Thus, at 520 °C the parameters derived by Baldwin for KCl coated vessels would predict a limit for 2H2 + O2 at ca. 5.7 torr in a 10.2 cm diameter vessel of unit efficiency. The observed limit was 4.56 torr. This difference is reflected in a h her value for namely 6.3 x 10 at 520 °C compared with Baldwin s f re of 4.6x10 l.mole. sec already quoted. Over the temperature range 800—1000 K, Kurzius and... [Pg.35]

The experimental data of Kowalsky on 2H2 + O2 mixtures have been analyzed by Semenov [59] on the basis of reactions (i)—(v), together with surface destruction of H atoms. Because of the lower activation energies of reactions (i) and (hi) compared with reaction (ii), the concentrations of OH and O were assumed to be small compared with H. The variation of H atom concentration could thus be deduced by the method of partial stationary state concentrations [60], giving the net branching factor 0 at pressure p as... [Pg.38]

Second explosion limits and the slow reaction in vessels having very low surface destruction efficiencies for hydroperoxyl and hydrogen peroxide... [Pg.39]

First, since competition between reactions (xi) and (v) or (vb) is excluded by the second limit behaviour referred to in Sect. 4.2 immediately above, the peroxide must be formed by mutual interaction of two HO2 radicals either at the surface by reaction (va) or in the gas phase by reaction (x) below. Second, the autocatalytic nature of the reaction can only be attributed to the dissociation of H2 Oj by reaction (vii) or the alternative (viia). Competition between the dissociation and a surface destruction of H2O2 would introduce a diameter dependence of the rate which is contrary to the results. A second function of the ageing of the surface therefore must be to eliminate surface destruction of the peroxide. Third, if H2O2 always dissociates by (vii) or (viia), the formation of HO2 by reaction (iv) always leads to a chain propagating cycle... [Pg.48]

Baldwin and Walker [99] have pointed out that, from kinetic considerations, surface reactions of alkylperoxy radicals cannot play a significant role except at very low overall rates of reaction and conclude that it is more likely that surface destruction of relatively stable intermediates such as the alkyl hydroperoxides or hydrogen peroxide are the main cause of surface effects in hydrocarbon oxidation. Luckett and Pollard [68, 134] have provided evidence, which suggests that the surface destruction of tert-butylhydroperoxide is indeed important during the oxidation of isobutane below ca. 320 °C. Since isobutene and acetone are known products of the decomposition of tert-butylhydroperoxide, it is clear that many of the foregoing results can be explained in these terms, but if this is the predominant heterogeneous reaction the yield of acetone would be... [Pg.329]

As the reaction develops, autocatalysis arising from (16) and (20) becomes important and consequently, (XVIII) and (XIX) no longer apply. For the KCl coated vessels in which the surface destruction of HO 2 radicals is thought to be rapid, the following reactions have to be added to the basic mechanism, viz. [Pg.409]

R.R. Maly, R. Klein, N. Peters and G. Konig, Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Knock Induced Surface Destruction, SAE Technical Paper 900025 (1990). [Pg.759]

Corrosion is the chemical or electrochemical surface destruction of solids, and like fracture and wear it can lead to failure of the material. Corrosion can be classified as ... [Pg.229]

The aim of the present work is to develop a model of corrosive dissolution oiPt binary nanocluster Pt Me (Me Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Ru) in working environment of low temperature fuel cells on the basis of quantum-chemical methods application and deduction of physico-chemical peculiarities ofPr (with different structure and elementary content) surface destruction under the influence of H O, Cl, OH, HjO. ... [Pg.200]

The relationship between wear resistance and material hardness known from abrasion is valid only at small jet angles because of the comparable wear mechanisms. According to Bitter (1963), abrasion is dominant with the sliding jet and surface destruction with the impacting jet. [Pg.525]

Possible surface destruction Laser heating or annealing Nondestructive... [Pg.586]


See other pages where Surface destruction is mentioned: [Pg.86]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.1620]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.825]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.897]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.734]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info