Surface analysis using ionic

Quantitative analysis using FAB is not straightforward, as with all ionisation techniques that use a direct insertion probe. While the goal of the exercise is to determine the bulk concentration of the analyte in the FAB matrix, FAB is instead measuring the concentration of the analyte in the surface of the matrix. The analyte surface concentration is not only a function of bulk analyte concentration, but is also affected by such factors as temperature, pressure, ionic strength, pH, FAB matrix, and sample matrix. With FAB and FTB/LSIMS the sample signal often dies away when the matrix, rather than the sample, is consumed therefore, one cannot be sure that the ion signal obtained represents the entire sample. External standard FAB quantitation methods are of questionable accuracy, and even simple internal standard methods can be trusted only where the analyte is found in a well-controlled sample matrix or is separated from its sample matrix prior to FAB analysis. Therefore, labelled internal standards and isotope dilution methods have become the norm for FAB quantitation. 

In MEKC, mainly anionic surface-active compounds, in particular SDS, are used. SDS and all other anionic surfactants have a net negative charge over a wide range of pH values, and therefore the micelles have a corresponding electrophoretic mobility toward the anode (opposite the direction of electro-osmotic flow). Anionic species do not interact with the negatively charged surface of the capillary, which is favorable in common CZE but especially in ACE. Therefore, SDS is the best-studied tenside in MEKC. Long-chain cationic ammonium species have also been employed for mainly anionic and neutral solutes (16). Bile salts as representatives of anionic surfactants have been used for the analysis of ionic and nonionic compounds and also for the separation of optical isomers (17-19). 

Two points, however, should be taken into account. First, natural crystals can show significant variability that depends upon the growth conditions and locality (e.g., solid solutions and incorporation of impurities). It is necessary to measure the bulk crystal structure of such samples before it is possible to determine the surface structure using the CTR approach for such samples. Second, the CTR intensities can depend on the type of form factors (e.g., neutral or ionic form factors) used in the bulk structure analysis. At minimum, the calculated bulk Bragg reflectivities must reproduce the observed values precisely internal consistency requires that we use the same atomic form factors that were used in the determination of the bulk crystal structure. Similarly, the bulk vibrational amplitudes derived from the original bulk crystal structure analysis must be used. In many cases, vibrational amplitudes are anisotropic and are therefore described by a tensor. The appropriate projection of the vibrations for each scattering condition, Q, needs to be included in the expression for Fuc-... 

These surface-specific techniques provide information on the ionic liquid structure and composition at the surface. They probe the interfacial region at various technique-specific probing depths for analysis of surface concentration and structural identification. Vibrational spectroscopy, SFG in particular, is a widely used tool for orientational analysis of ionic Uquids at interfaces [1]. 

One important use of SFG vibrational spectroscopy is the orientational analysis of ionic liquids at gas-liquid interfaces. For example, the study of the structural orientation ofionic liquids using common cation types, that is, [BMIM], combined with different anions, gives information on the effects of both cation and anion types [3, 22, 26-28]. Additional surface analytical work includes SFG studies under vacuum conditions for probing the second-order susceptibility tensor that depends on the polar orientation of the molecule and can be correlated to the measured SFG signal intensities. Supporting information is frequently obtained by complementary bulk spectroscopic techniques, such as Raman and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis, for the analysis of the pure ionic liquids. 

In 2003, a process qualification study was initiated with a test laboratory to qualify and validate the assembly process using Surface Insulation Resistance (SIR) electrical performance and Ion Chromatography testing on a test board. The study used IPC Class 3 level performance per IPC ANSI J-STD OOlC. The analysis was conducted using ionic cleanliness evaluation by Ion Chromatography IPC-TM-650, method 2.3.28 and SIR characterization IPC-TM-650, method 2.6.3.3A. 

---