Subject reaction rate theory

Reviews of reaction rate theory by Laidler and Wayne are very helpful. A classic book by Glasstone et al. is still an excellent introduction to the subject. Eyring et al." provide an advanced, detailed treatment of kinetic theory. 

Recent years have also witnessed exciting developments in the active control of unimolecular reactions [30,31]. Reactants can be prepared and their evolution interfered with on very short time scales, and coherent hght sources can be used to imprint information on molecular systems so as to produce more or less of specified products. Because a well-controlled unimolecular reaction is highly nonstatistical and presents an excellent example in which any statistical theory of the reaction dynamics would terribly fail, it is instmctive to comment on how to view the vast control possibihties, on the one hand, and various statistical theories of reaction rate, on the other hand. Note first that a controlled unimolecular reaction, most often subject to one or more external fields and manipulated within a very short time scale, undergoes nonequilibrium processes and is therefore not expected to be describable by any unimolecular reaction rate theory that assumes the existence of an equilibrium distribution of the internal energy of the molecule. Second, strong deviations Ifom statistical behavior in an uncontrolled unimolecular reaction can imply the existence of order in chaos and thus more possibilities for inexpensive active control of product formation. Third, most control scenarios rely on quantum interference effects that are neglected in classical reaction rate theory. Clearly, then, studies of controlled reaction dynamics and studies of statistical reaction rate theory complement each other. 

The pH dependence of the dissolution rates of silicates is a subject of intensive theoretical interest, based on transition-state and surface-reaction rate theories (e.g., Schott and Petit, 1987 Wollast and Chou, 1988 Stumm and Wieland, this volume). The features of the pH dependence of the silicate dissolution rates that are relevant to this section are the reported dependence of the rate in the acidic solution range (pH < 5.5) on a power of the hydrogen ion concentration, Roc[H + ]0 5 to [H + ]10, and its dependence in the alkalilne range (pH >7.5) on Roc[H + ]-°3. 

Henry Eyring s courses in statistical mechanics and reaction rate theory opened a new world to me when I took them in 1947-48 while a graduate student in physiology. My most vivid memories of these courses are the clarity of his lectures, his enthusiasm for his subject, and the insight he imparted into the behavior of matter at the molecular level. The brilliance of his lectures was emphasized when Henry was out of town and his post-doctoral students had to substitute for him they suffered in the inevitable comparison. 

The overall requirement is 1.0—2.0 s for low energy waste compared to typical design standards of 2.0 s for RCRA ha2ardous waste units. The most important, ie, rate limiting steps are droplet evaporation and chemical reaction. The calculated time requirements for these steps are only approximations and subject to error. For example, formation of a skin on the evaporating droplet may inhibit evaporation compared to the theory, whereas secondary atomization may accelerate it. Errors in estimates of the activation energy can significantly alter the chemical reaction rate constant, and the pre-exponential factor from equation 36 is only approximate. Also, interactions with free-radical species may accelerate the rate of chemical reaction over that estimated solely as a result of thermal excitation therefore, measurements of the time requirements are desirable. 

Letter from G. N. Lewis to Paul Ehrenfest, undated but probably 1925, G. N. Lewis Correspondence, BL.UCB. G. N. Lewis and D. F. Smith promised in their paper, "The Theory of Reaction Rate," JACS 47 (1925) 15081520, to publish a demonstration that a range of frequencies of radiation affecting degrees of freedom in a molecule is responsible for chemical reaction. This paper was the subject of the letter, with anonymous referee s report, from Arthur B. Lamb to G. N. Lewis, 28 February 1925, G. N. Lewis Papers, BL.UCB. The referee said "No real unimolecular reaction has actually been observed they have been shown to be merely catalytic the idea that a unimolecular reaction is due to collision between a quantum and a molecule is not original with Lewis."... 

The second part (sections H and I) is devoted to a detailed discussion of the dynamics of unimolecular reactions in the presence and the absence of a potential barrier. Section H presents a critical examination of the Kramers approach. It is stressed that the expressions of the reaction rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-friction limits are subjected to restrictive conditions, namely, the high barrier case and the quasi-stationary regime. The dynamics related to one-dimensional diffusion in a bistable potential is analyzed, and the exactness of the time dependence of the reaction rate is emphasized. The essential results of the non-Markovian theory extending the Kramers conclusions are also discussed. The final section investigates in detail the time evolution of an unimolecular reaction in the absence of a potential barrier. The formal treatment makes evident a two-time-scale description of the dynamics. 

Hammett s view of the scope of the subject is summarized in the rarely mentioned sub-title of his book Reaction Rates, Equilibria, and Mechanisms . His conception of the subject still defines its core, but requires amplifying certain other topics are now usually deemed part of physical organic chemistry. Thus the rationalization of the experimental results of studies of reaction rates, equilibria, and mechanisms involves the application of the electronic theory of the structures and reactions of organic molecules, either in its early forms as developed by Robinson, Ingold, and others on the basis of the electron-pair covalent bond, or in its later forms involving quantum mechanical treatments. 

Evidently, the ring-size dependent exothermicities of one-step cycloadditions do not explain the differences in their reaction rates. In fact, these differences can be understood only by going beyond the simplistic electron-pushing formalism. To really understand these reactions, one needs to compare the transition states of these reactions in the context of molecular orbital (MO) theory. These comparisons—and the presentation of the requisite theoretical tools—are the subjects of Sections 15.2.2-15.2.4. 

The necessity of considering chemical reactions that proceed at finite rates distinguishes combustion theory from other extensions of fluid dynamics. Concepts of chemical kinetics therefore comprise an integral part of the subject. The phenomenological laws for rates of chemical reactions are presented in Section B.l. Various mechanisms for chemical reactions are considered in Section B.2, which includes discussion of recent work in explosion theory. This section contains material specifically related to combustion that is seldom found in basic texts on chemical kinetics. Theoretical predictions of reaction-rate functions for homogeneous and heterogeneous processes are addressed in Sections B.3 and B.4, respectively. References [1]-[4] are textbooks of a basic nature on chemical kinetics [5]-[12] contain, in addition, material more directly applicable in combustion,... 

The most traditional theory for chemical reaction rates is the transition state theory (TST) established in 1940 s. It has recently been disclosed, however, that the TST caimot be applied to varieties of solution reactions. Examples can be found in biological enzymatic reactions, electron or proton transfer reactions atom-group transfer reactions, and isomerization reactions. Smdy of solution reactions is one of the most traditional as well as the most fundamental subjects in chemistry. The situation mentioned above means, nevertheless, that we have not yet established a general expression on rates of solution reactions. Accordingly, many discussions have been stimulated for investigating the unknown general expression. ... 

Theory and kinetic analysis (38 entries). Many aspects of the theory of kinetic analysis were discussed (27 entries). Some papers were specifically concerned with discrimination of fit of data between alternative kinetic expressions or with constant reaction rate thermal analysis. Other articles (11 entries) were concerned with aspects of the fundamental theory of the subject and with the compensation effect. The content of papers concerned with kinetic analyses appeared to accept the common basis of the applicability of the rate equations listed in Table 3.3. 

---