Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Subject fast diffusion processes

The square root of the parameter w may be regarded as the ratio of the adsorption-desorption distance to d. varies with the packing or particle arrangement within the bed and is dependent upon the same factors that determine A. In addition to the time required to move sample molecules between adsorption sites and the moving solvent phase, the actual adsorption-desorption process may be slow. In this case an additional term is required in Eq. (5-5). However, adsorption-desorption rates are generally fast in useful chromatographic systems. Both adsorbed and nonadsorbed samples are subject to diffusion (mass transfer) between... [Pg.265]

A second-phase that forms a liquid at the firing temperature can provide a fast diffusion path for densification but grain growth by the Ostwald ripening process may also be enhanced. In this case, high density is normally accompanied by appreciable grain growth. This commonly used fabrication approach is the subject... [Pg.573]

Differences between the two methods exist with regard to particle property and type of quantity DUM only evaluates the translational diffusion (xh,t) and probes number frequencies, whereas DLS is also sensitive to the diffusive rotation (xh app) and yields intensity weighted distribution functions. Furthermore, the methods usually differ in sample size Typical sample concentrations in DLS are in the range of 0.01 vol%. These are, for instance, 50,000 particles a 100 nm in a measurement volume of 10 pm, which are all observed in the order of minutes (Willemse et al. 1997), whereas with DUM, the total number of traced particles is smaller by factor 10-100, with an observation time in the order of seconds for each. Last but not least, DLS allows for a temporal resolution in the range from ns to ms, whereas DUM is subject to video processing, typically with 30 frames per second, and is, therefore, not sensitive to very fast relaxation processes (like gradient diffusion). [Pg.43]

In summary it was the aim of this lecture to discuss a new mechanism without rapid quenching which produces amorphous metals by solid state reactions. All parameter known so far summarize in the critical condition to be fast enough for the competing crystalline phases. The main subject was on the gas-crystal reaction were an interface limited process is expected for the reaction kinetic. This remains one on the vice versa case of the polymorphic crystallization of some metallic glasses. Pure metallic diffusion couples seem to exhibit a /t-law for the growth of the planar amorphous layers at least for longer times. This case comes close to the eutectic crystallization in the reverse subject. All amorphization processes lead into the same metastable amorphous state, which is far from being only a "frozen in" liquid. Solid state reactions are just a new way into the same minimum. [Pg.183]

With an E° value of —0.75 V, entry no. 19 of Table 17, reaction between alkyl halides and alkyllithium compounds, represents a strongly exergonic electron-transfer reaction which is expected to proceed at a diffusion-controlled tate. Experimental rate constants are not available, but such reactions are qualitatively known to be very fast. As we proceed to entry no. 21, two model cases of the nucleophilic displacement mechanism, it can first be noted that the nosylate/[nosylate]- couple is electrochemically reversible the radical anion can be generated cathodically and is easily detected by esr spectroscopy (Maki and Geske, 1961). Hence its E° = —0.61 V is a reasonably accurate value. E° (PhS /PhS-) is known with considerably less accuracy since it refers to an electrochemically irreversible process (Dessy et al., 1966). The calculated rate constant is therefore subject to considerable uncertainty and it cannot at present be decided whether the Marcus theory is compatible with this type of electron-transfer step. In the absence of quantitative experimental data, the same applies to entry no. 22 of Table 17. For the PhS-/BuBr reaction we again suffer from the inaccuracy of E° (PhS /PhS-) what can be concluded is that for an electron-transfer step to be feasible the higher E° value (—0.74 V) should be the preferred one. The reality of an electron-transfer mechanism has certainly been strongly disputed, however (Kornblum, 1975). [Pg.171]

This mechanism is denoted as an EC mechanism (Testa and Reinmuth, 1961 Bott, 1997). Thus homogeneous kinetic terms may be combined with the expressions for diffusion and convection [i.e. a modified version of (18)] to give the temporal variation of the concentration of a species in an electrode reaction mechanism. In order to model the voltammetric response associated with this mechanism, a knowledge of , a, ko and k is required, or deduced from a theoretical-experimental comparison, and the set of concentrationtime equations for species A, B and C must be solved subject to the constraints of the Butler-Volmer equation and the experimental design. Considerable simplification of the theory is achieved if the kinetics for the forward and reverse processes associated with the E step are fast, which is a good approximation for many organic reactions. Section 7 describes the approaches used to solve the equations associated with electrode reaction mechanisms, thus enabling theoretical simulation of voltammetric responses to be achieved. [Pg.24]

Shock tube studies of fast reactions are subject to several commonly recognized physical effects, some advantageous and others not. The spatial gradient in the time origin of a chemical reaction in the postshock volume makes for a reaction zone profile with accountable axial gradients in molecular concentrations, temperature, and flow speed. Fortunately, however, the transport processes of diffusion, thermal conduction, and viscous dissipation are so slow in comparison with the... [Pg.96]

Melt spun fibers are subjected to a hot drawing process to encourage polymer chain orientation and the development of crystallinity witl the fibers. Electrospun polyester has been produced via melt spinning , but in order to render fimctionality to the resulting material, gelatin was incorporated by subsequent surface modification involving formaldehyde. This in turn improves physical fiber properties, but slows the diffusion of small molecular species within the fiber (thus, for exanqile, imdrawn polyester dyes more readily than drawn material). The shorter diffusion path out of fine fib is responsible for lower color fastness of febrics derived ifom them. [Pg.200]

Equipment which is used in contacting a gas with a reactive liquid can be gas absorber or a gas-liquid reactor. This terminology itself shows the interdisciplinary nature of the process which involves both chemical (i.e. reaction kinetics) and physical (molecular diffusion, fluid mechanics etc.) phenomena. Thus the subject does not fall entirely within the province of either the chemist or the conventional engineer. The classical literature on this area (Astarita (1), Danckwerts (2), Sherwood et al. (3) etc.) has mainly dealt with gas absorption, in which the reaction is applied merely to enhance the rate of mass transfer. In such cases, there is also always a physical gas absorption process to refer to and the reactions are usually "fast". [Pg.291]

Thus, in the system coolant — oxide layer the Co ions are subjected to an adsorption—desorption process leading to a cobalt concentration in the oxide layer on the surface of the materials which is controlled by the cobalt input into the coolant. In the case of very low or zero cobalt input, the cobalt concentration in the oxide (and, simultaneously, the Co activity concentration) decreases steadily according to a power-law decline (Lister, 1992). As yet it is not known whether the release of chemically bound cobalt from the chromites would be fast enough to explain the observed processes or whether the above-mentioned oxide grain boundary diffusion of Co is the rate-controlling process. [Pg.311]


See other pages where Subject fast diffusion processes is mentioned: [Pg.172]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.981]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.793]    [Pg.577]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion Subject

Diffusion process

Fast diffusion

Fast processes

Subject processes

Subject processing

© 2024 chempedia.info