Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structure determination by direct

Duax, W L., Hauptman, H., Weeks, C. M., and Norton, D. A. Valinomycin crystal structure determination by direct methods.Science 176, 911-914 (1972). [Pg.778]

The secondary structure elements, formed in this way and held together by the hydrophobic core, provide a rigid and stable framework. They exhibit relatively little flexibility with respect to each other, and they are the best-defined parts of protein structures determined by both x-ray and NMR techniques. Functional groups of the protein are attached to this framework, either directly by their side chains or, more frequently, in loop regions that connect sequentially adjacent secondary structure elements. We will now have a closer look at these structural elements. [Pg.14]

It is possible, therefore, to use the GL(r), normally for L = 2 and possibly 4, to explore the extent of the local structure determined by the direct orientational correlations. An alternative and more detailed way in which to investigate the... [Pg.77]

Fig. 4. The molecular structure, determined by solution NMR (James et al., 1997), of Syrian hamster 90-231 (SHa90-231) prion with ball-and-stick representation of the HI domain (SHal09-122 MKHMAGAAAAGAW). Note that two short /(-chains (SI, S2) nearly stack in the hydrogen-bonding direction. If the palindromic polyalanine region was also in a /(-conformation, there would be a three-stranded /(-sheet. The structural difference between PrPc and PrPSc is in the 90-145 domain. [Model drawn using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991)]. Fig. 4. The molecular structure, determined by solution NMR (James et al., 1997), of Syrian hamster 90-231 (SHa90-231) prion with ball-and-stick representation of the HI domain (SHal09-122 MKHMAGAAAAGAW). Note that two short /(-chains (SI, S2) nearly stack in the hydrogen-bonding direction. If the palindromic polyalanine region was also in a /(-conformation, there would be a three-stranded /(-sheet. The structural difference between PrPc and PrPSc is in the 90-145 domain. [Model drawn using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991)].
The joint use of X-ray and neutron diffraction data is particularly expedient. Firstly, the interaction between the magnetic moments of neutrons and electrons is the basis for polarized-neutron diffraction, from which the unpaired spin density in a system can be derived. The diffraction of spin-polarized neutrons is an important technique, beyond the scope of this volume. Secondly, the interaction between neutrons and the atomic nuclei, which is the basis for structure determination by neutron diffraction, leads directly to information on the positions and mean-square vibrations of the nuclei. [Pg.86]

Many crystalline solids can undergo chemical transformations induced, for example, by incident radiation or by heat. An important aspect of such solid-state reactions is to understand the structural properties of the product phase obtained directly from the reaction, and in particular to rationalize the relationships between the structural properties of the product and reactant phases. In many cases, however, the product phase is amorphous, but for cases in which the product phase is crystalline, it is usually obtained as a microcrystalline powder that does not contain single crystals of suitable size and quality to allow structure determination by single-crystal XRD. In such cases, there is a clear opportunity to apply structure determination from powder XRD data in order to characterize the structural properties of product phases. [Pg.168]

Part II deals, in six chapters, with the principles underlying the progressive stages in the elucidation of internal structure. Chapters VI and VII deal with the principles of structure determination by trial Chapter VIII with the use of physical properties (such as habit, cleavage, and optical, magnetic, pyro- and piezo-electric properties) as auxiliary evidence in structure determination. In Chapter IX are to be found several examples of the derivation of complete structures. Chapter X gives an introductory account of the use of direct and semi-direct methods based on the calculation of electron density distributions and vector distributions from X-ray diffraction data. [Pg.8]

The complete structure, determined by Robertson (1933 c), shows that this is substantially correct the two molecules have their longest axes almost exactly parallel to the direction of highest index, and their intermediate axes tilted (one in one direction and the other in the opposite direction) 29° to the 6 axis (Fig. 169). [Pg.310]

The determination of a molecular structure from X-ray diffraction data is of critical importance to modem chemical and biological sciences. For small molecules, the structure is normally determined by direct methods. The X-ray diffraction pattern resulting from the interaction of X-rays with the electron clouds of different elements gives a pattern from which the elements present and their connectivity may be deduced. The expected diffraction pattern calculated for an apparent structure is then compared with the observed data to refine the result. Refinement factors (usually expressed as Rw) of 1-3% are common in modem small molecule structure determinations. [Pg.774]

The main source of conformational information for biopolymers are the easy-to-obtain chemical shifts that can be translated into dihedral restraints. In addition, for fully 13C labeled compounds, proton-driven spin diffusion between carbons [72] can be used to measure quantitatively distances between carbons. The CHHC experiment is the equivalent of the NOESY in solution that measures distances between protons by detecting the resonances of the attached carbons. While both techniques, proton-driven spin diffusion and CHHC experiment [73], allow for some variation in the distance as determined from cross-peak integrals, REDOR [74] experiments in selective labeled compounds measure very accurate distances by direct observation of the oscillation of a signal by the dipolar coupling. While the latter technique provides very accurate distances, it provides only one piece of information per sample. Therefore, the more powerful techniques proton-driven spin diffusion and CHHC have taken over when it comes to structure determination by ss-NMR of fully labeled ligands. [Pg.105]

In most cases the necessary material constant can be determined by direct measurement. In practice however, because of the time and cost required to measure the numerous types and combination possibilities of plastics and contacting media, only a limited selection of such experimental constants is available. Consequently in practice one cannot avoid using estimated values. Such estimations are possible within a degree of accuracy adequate for practical purposes, when the chemical structure of the migrating substance, the polymer and the contacting media are known. Thermodynamic terms are used to characterize the equilibrium distribution of a diffusant substance between plastic (P) and contacting media (e.g. a liquid L). The most important of these terms is the chemical potential i. [Pg.79]


See other pages where Structure determination by direct is mentioned: [Pg.203]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.265]   


SEARCH



Direct structure determination

Structure determination by direct methods

Structure direct

Structure directing

© 2024 chempedia.info