Direct structure determination

In scrutinizing the various proposed reaction sequences in Eq. (26), one may classify the behavior of carbene complexes toward olefins according to four intimately related considerations (a) relative reactivities of various types of olefins (b) the polar nature of the metal-carbene bond (c) the option of prior coordination of olefin to the transition metal, or direct interaction with the carbene carbon and (d) steric factors, including effects arising from ligands on the transition metal as well as substituents on the olefinic and carbene carbons. Information related to these various influences is by no means exhaustive at this point. Consequently, some apparent contradictions exist which seem to cast doubt on the relevance of various model compound studies to conventional catalysis of the metathesis reaction, a process which unfortunately involves species which elude direct structural determination. 

When it is assumed that the phases of the structure factors are unknown, the analysis proceeds well, after fixing the origin of the cubic unit cell by choosing the sign of the strong (111) reflection. This corresponds to a direct structure determination without any prior knowledge of the structure, and supports the value of the maximum entropy method in the early stages of structure determination. 

Thus, although the nmr methods are important for comparison of the structure of proteins in the solid state and in solution, they are also of importance in areas where X-ray crystallography can provide little information. One of these areas concerns the time dependence of protein structure, for molecular motion over a wide range of time scales can be detected. Table IV indicates the methods and references to these studies. The range of the nmr technique is from about 10 10 s to slower than 10 s. Thus, although more restricted than X-ray crystallography in direct structure determination, the nmr studies can check the solution structure and complement the diffraction studies once the overall similarity between the solid and solution structure is proved. In this way nmr relates the static picture of a protein structure to the kinetic data of solution chemistry. 

Direct structure determination. In some crystal projections the phase angles of the reflections relevant to the projection are all the same (with respect to a reference point). In such circumstances the image of the structure can be calculated directly from the intensities of the reflections. The circumstances in which we can be certain that this is so are unfortunately rare. Three conditions must be fulfilled. The first is that the projection must possess apparent centres of symmetry not necessarily true centres of symmetry in the crystal, but apparent centres of symmetry such as occur when there are twofold axes of symmetry parallel to the zone axis of the projection. With respect to any apparent centre of symmetry, the phase angles of all reflections are necessarily either 0° or 180°. 

Pig. 208. For this projected structure, in which the black circles represent heavy atoms, all reflections having h-j- k even have a phase angle of 0°, but those having h k odd may have phase angles of 0° or 180°. Therefore direct structure determination is not possible. 

A1 MAS NMR spectra of chemically untreated zeolites are thus much simpler than those of their 29Si counterparts. This is a direct consequence of the fact that while five types of Si(nAl) environments are possible for the silicon atom, only one possibility exists for the aluminum. However, while Si in zeolites is always present in four-coordination, Al can be four- or six-coordinated, and 27A1 MAS NMR is a very sensitive quantitative probe for this. In other words, 27A1 NMR is most valuable in probing the coordination, quantity, and location of Al atoms in chemically treated zeolites, but less useful than 29Si NMR for direct structural determination. 

There are many situations where direct structure determination is impossible or not reliable due to a variety of reasons as discussed above. Thus, molecular modeling is more than welcome to intervene in solving the problems. 

The first section will be devoted to the synthesis of these libraries using the so-called mix-and-split or divide-and-recombine approach (2, 3) and to their analytical characterization. The following sections will focus on different methods to determine the structure of an active component from an SP pool library direct structure determination (Section 7.2) and indirect structure determination, via deconvolutive methods (Section 7.3) or encoding methods (Section 7.4), will be covered. Finally, a section will be devoted to new trends in SP pool libraries, paying particular attention to innovative methods for the fast and reliable discovery of new active structures through miniaturization (bead-based techniques). 

DIRECT STRUCTURE DETERMINATION OF POSITIVES FROM SOLID-PHASE POOL LIBRARIES... 

Direct structure determination methods, where positives are characterized directly via off-bead or on-bead identification of their chemical structure, will be described in detail in this section. Indirect methods that determine the structure of positives from the library architecture will be covered later they use either deconvolutive methods (Section 7.3), where the iterative synthesis of library pools with decreasing complexity via sequential determination of the best monomers leads to the identification of a positive structure, or encoding methods (Section 7.4), where, during the library synthesis, the structure of each component is coupled to a tag that can be read from a single bead after the library screening. 

For laboratory-frame experiments s is equal to 1, for experiments in the presence of strong on-resonance r.f. irradiation (so-called rotating-frame experiments ), s = -1/2. The dipolar interaction leads directly to geometrical information about the spin system. The Hamiltonian contains, besides the geometrical quantities % and r,y, only constants. If the dependences on angle and distances can be disentangled in the analysis of the experimental data, direct structure determination is possible. This disentanglement is sometimes, but not always, possible. We will return to this point later. 

---