Structure aldehyde enolates

R3 R2 and R2 Ri gauche interactions however, for the same set of substituents, an increase in the steric requirements of either Rj or R3 will influence only one set of vicinal steric interactions (Rj R2 or R3 R2). Some support for these conclusions has been cited (eqs. [6] and [7]). These qualitative arguments may also be relevant to the observed populations of hydrogen- and nonhydrogen-bonded populations of the aldol adducts as well (see Table 1, entries K, L). Unfortunately, little detailed information exists on the solution geometries of these metal chelates. Furthermore, in many studies it is impossible to ascertain whether the aldol condensations between metal enolates and aldehydes were carried out under kinetic or thermodynamic conditions. Consequently, the importance of metal structure and enolate geometry in the definition of product stereochemistry remains ill defined. This is particularly true in the numerous studies reported on the Reformatsky reaction (20) and related variants (21). 

Allylic halogenation of aldehyde enol acetates, e.g. 23, derived from norbornadiene provided an elegant and efficient construction of the tricyclic structure 24 found in many sesquiterpenes such as cyclosativene, cyclocopacamphene, longicyclene, a-santalene and its derivatives. This rearrangement in fact arises from an electrophilic addition to a multiple bond with participation of the homoallylic bond. The tricyclic skeleton was also obtained successfully by treatment of 5-methylenenorborn-2-ene with A-bromosuccinimide in aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide which gave 5-bromo-2-hydroxymethyltricyclo[2.2.1.0 ]heptane (25) in high yield. 

Under the conditions used for the generation of silyl enol ethers of symmetrical ketones, unsymmetrical ketones give mixtures of structurally isomeric enol ethers, with the predominant product being the more substituted enol ether (eq 20). Highly hindered bases, such as lithium diisopropylamide (LDA), favor formation of the kinetic, less substituted silyl enol ether, whereas bro-momagnesium diisopropylamide (BMDA) generates the more substituted, thermodynamic silyl enol ether. A comhination of TMSCl/sodium iodide has also been used to form silyl enol ethers of simple aldehydes and ketones as well as from a,p-unsaturated aldehydes and ketones. Additionally, treatment of a-halo ketones with zinc, TMSCl, and TMEDA in ether provides... 

Transmetallation of the lithium or potassium enolates is also a reliable method for the preparation of palladium and nickel enolates, as illustrated in Scheme 2.50. Clear evidence for the C-bound structure of enolates 172 and 173 thus prepared was provided by NMR spectroscopy and - for nickel enolate 172 (M = Ni, L = Cp ) - by a crystal structure analysis. The reaction of C-bound nickel and palladium enolates 172 and 173 with aldehydes is much more sluggish and much less uniform than the analogs of that of the polar main-group metals. In addition to P-hydroxyketones or esters, products resulting from a Tishchenko reaction were also observed [164b]. 

Transition structures for the enol boronoate/aldehyde reaction. 

A single Kekule structure does not completely descnbe the actual bonding in the molecule Ketal (Section 17 8) An acetal denved from a ketone Keto-enol tautomerism (Section 18 4) Process by which an aldehyde or a ketone and its enol equilibrate... 

Enols aie related to an aldehyde or a ketone by a proton-transfer equilibrium known as keto-enol tautomerism. (Tautomerism refers to an interconversion between two structures that differ by the placement of an atom or a group.)... 

The existence of imidazole-4-aldehyde (232) in the enolic form 233 was postulated on the basis of chemical evidence," but the infrared spectrum indicates the presence of a carbonyl group and absence of a hydroxyl group, suggesting that structure 232 should... 

The effect of substrate structure on product profile is further illustrated by the reactions of cis- and trons-stilbene oxides 79 and 83 with lithium diethylamide (Scheme 5.17) [32]. Lithiated cis-stilbene oxide 80 rearranges to enolate 81, which gives ketone 82 after protic workup, whereas with lithiated trans-stilbene oxide 84, phenyl group migration results in enolate 85 and hence aldehyde 86 on workup. Triphenylethylene oxide 87 underwent efficient isomerization to ketone 90 [32]. 

Properties of Latia luciferin. Latia luciferin is a highly hydrophobic, fat-soluble compound, and volatile under vacuum. It is a colorless liquid, with an absorption maximum at 207nm (s approx. 13,700 Fig. 6.1.2). The chemical structure of Latia luciferin has been determined to be 1 (C15H24O2), an enol formate of a terpene aldehyde 3 (Fig. 6.1.3 Shimomura and Johnson, 1968b). The enol formate group of Latia luciferin is unstable the luciferin is spontaneously hydrolyzed... 

I4 Boron enolates derived from oxazolidinone 3 arc reported to give either syn- or imp-adducts depending on the amounl of boryl Inflate and base employed, the character of the base, and the structure of the aldehyde see H. Danda, M. M. Hansen. C. H. Heathcock, J. Org. Chem. 55,173... 

Provided that the reaction occurs through a chairlike TS, the E anti/Z syn relationship will hold. There are three cases that can lead to departure from this relationship. These include a nonchair TS, that can involve either an open TS or a nonchair cyclic TS. Internal chelation of the aldehyde or enolate can also cause a change in TS structure. 

Summary of the Relationship between Diastereoselectivity and the Transition Structure. In this section we considered simple diastereoselection in aldol reactions of ketone enolates. Numerous observations on the reactions of enolates of ketones and related compounds are consistent with the general concept of a chairlike TS.35 These reactions show a consistent E - anti Z - syn relationship. Noncyclic TSs have more variable diastereoselectivity. The prediction or interpretation of the specific ratio of syn and anti product from any given reaction requires assessment of several variables (1) What is the stereochemical composition of the enolate (2) Does the Lewis acid promote tight coordination with both the carbonyl and enolate oxygen atoms and thereby favor a cyclic TS (3) Does the TS have a chairlike conformation (4) Are there additional Lewis base coordination sites in either reactant that can lead to reaction through a chelated TS Another factor comes into play if either the aldehyde or the enolate, or both, are chiral. In that case, facial selectivity becomes an issue and this is considered in Section 2.1.5. 

Entries 4 and 9 are closely related structures that illustrate the ability to control stereochemistry by choice of the Lewis acid. In Entry 4, the Lewis acid is BF3 and the (3-oxygen is protected as a f-butyldiphenylsilyl derivative. This leads to reaction through an open TS, and the reaction is under steric control, resulting in the 3,4-syn product. In Entry 9, the enolate is formed using di-n-butylboron triflate (1.2 equiv.), which permits the aldehyde to form a chelate. The chelated aldehyde then reacts via an open TS with respect to the silyl ketene acetal, and the 3,4-anti isomer dominates by more than 20 1. 

Polar effects appear to be important for 3 -alkoxy substituents in enolates. 3-Benzyloxy groups enhance the facial selectivity of /(-boron enolates, and this is attributed to a TS I in which the benzyloxy group faces toward the approaching aldehyde. This structure is thought to be preferable to an alternate conformation J, which may be destabilized by electron pair repulsions between the benzyloxy oxygen and the enolate oxygen.109... 

When there is also a stereogenic center in the silyl enol ether, it can enhance or detract from the underlying stereochemical preferences. The two reactions shown below possess reinforcing structures with regard to the aldehyde a-methyl and the enolate TBDMSO groups and lead to high stereoselectivity. The stereochemistry of the (3-TBDMSO group in the aldehyde has little effect on the stereoselectivity. 

The facial selectivity of the aldehydes 22A and 22B is dependent on both the configuration at the fi-ccnter and the nature of the enolate as indicated by the data below. Consider possible transition structures for these reactions and offer a rationale for the observed facial selectivity. 

The syntheses in Schemes 13.45 and 13.46 illustrate the use of oxazolidinone chiral auxiliaries in enantioselective synthesis. Step A in Scheme 13.45 established the configuration at the carbon that becomes C(4) in the product. This is an enolate alkylation in which the steric effect of the oxazolidinone chiral auxiliary directs the approach of the alkylating group. Step C also used the oxazolidinone structure. In this case, the enol borinate is formed and condensed with an aldehyde intermediate. This stereoselective aldol addition established the configuration at C(2) and C(3). The configuration at the final stereocenter at C(6) was established by the hydroboration in Step D. The selectivity for the desired stereoisomer was 85 15. Stereoselectivity in the same sense has been observed for a number of other 2-methylalkenes in which the remainder of the alkene constitutes a relatively bulky group.28 A TS such as 45-A can rationalize this result. 

Nitroalkenes are shown to be effective Michael acceptor B units in three sequential reactions (A + B + C coupling) in one reaction vessel. The sequence is initiated by enolate nucleophiles (A) and is terminated by aldehydes or acrylate electrophiles (C). The utility of this protocol is for rapid assembly of complex structures from simple and readily available components. A short total synthesis of a pyrrolizidine alkaloid is presented in Scheme 10.16.114... 

From the reactions shown in Scheme 5, it is obvious that only those uronic acid derivatives whose elimination proceeds with the formation of enolic or aldehydic groups, or both, afford products capable of reducing the Cu(II) ion. Although such structures can be expected from hexo- and hepto-furanuronic, as well as from hep-topyranuronic, acid derivatives, glycosides of pentofuranuronic and of hexopyranuronic acid derivatives do not exhibit reducing properties. However, in view of this generalization, the zero reducing power observed for compound 26 requires a different explanation. 

Scheme 7-18 shows Masamune s implementation of this approach, beginning with aldehyde 71.8 This is reacted with boron enolate reagent (S )-35c (mentioned in Chapter 3 see Scheme 7-8 for its structure) and provides aldol product 72 with excellent enantioselectivity (100 1). Aldehyde 73 is obtained... 

In the free state and in their reactions the simple aldehydes and ketones are in general known only in the aldo- and keto-forms. Erlen-meyer suggested the rule that the isomeric enol-structure, which might be formed at first in the production of acetaldehyde from glycol, for example, should in no case be capable of existence. 

---