Structural morphology effect study technique

On the same topic of DMFC performance with supported vs. unsupported catalysts Smotkin and co-workers concluded that at 363 Kthe supported PtRu (1 1) catalyst with a toad of 0.46 mg cm performed as welt as an unsupported PtRu (1 1) with over four times higher load, i.e., 2 mg cm [266]. It is likely that these differences between various studies are related not only to the intrinsic activity of the respective anode catalys layers but also to the manufacturing procedures such as catalyst layer preparation and application techniques, MEA hot pressing conditions (temperature, pressure and time), presence or absence of other binders (such as PTFE) and fuel cell compression. All these MEA manufacturing variables can affect, in a poorly understood manner at present, the structure, morphology and composition of the catalyst layer in the operating fuel cell. Therefore, in fuel cell experiments it is difficult to isolate the truly physico-chemical effect of the support on the catalytic activity. 

At the mesoscopic scale, interactions between molecular components in membranes and catalyst layers control the self-organization into nanophase-segregated media, structural correlations, and adhesion properties of phase domains. Such complex processes can be studied by various theoretical tools and simulation techniques (e.g., by coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations). Complex morphologies of the emerging media can be related to effective physicochemical properties that characterize transport and reaction at the macroscopic scale, using concepts from the theory of random heterogeneous media and percolation theory. 

Crystallinity and disorder are important structural parameters for understanding relationships between structure and physical properties. Flaws and distortions are the main features that limit the ultimate properties of textile fibers. Some of these crazes, cracks and voids are revealed under the electron microscope, either on the surface or in cross sections stained with heavy metals (J, 2). However, these staining techniques (that reveal the main morphological features) make it much more difficult to determine the degree of distortion of the crystalline fraction. Theoretically, line profile studies permit separation of effects due to crystalline size from those due to structural distortions. However, the lack of peaks in semicrystalline fiber x-ray patterns hinders that approach. 

The pressure gap is also a considerable challenge in model catalysis. It has been only recently addressed thanks to new techniques that can work under high-pressure conditions (relative to UHV). As we have seen in the introduction, several techniques are now available but they have up to now rarely been applied on supported model catalyst. Indeed we can expect that the effect of the pressure can be more dramatic than on extended surfaces because small particles are easier subject to structural and morphological evolution during reaction. Thus, it will be necessary to probe the reactivity and to characterize structurally the model catalyst in realistic reaction conditions. Microscopy techniques like STM, AFM, and TEM, coupled with activity measurements are suitable. The ultimate goal would be to measure the reactivity at the level of one supported cluster and to study the coupling between neighbouring clusters via the gas phase and the diffusion of reactants on the support. 

In the last ten years, a great deal of experimental work has been presented about the tensile properties of CNTs/polymer composites in the literature. However, it is difficult to generalize across these studies because of the large number of parameters that can influence the effective properties, including size and structure of the CNT, CNT/ polymer interaction, processing techniques and processing conditions. In this chapter, the effect of structure and morphology on the properties of the nanocomposites will be focused and discussed. 

---