Stresses, internal calculation

When constmction is complete, the pipeline must be tested for leaks and strength before being put into service industry code specifies the test procedures. Water is the test fluid of choice for natural gas pipelines, and hydrostatic testing is often carried out beyond the yield strength in order to reHeve secondary stresses added during constmction or to ensure that all defects are found. Industry code limits on the hoop stress control the test pressures, which are also limited by location classification based on population. Hoop stress is calculated from the formula, S = PD/2t, where S is the hoop stress in kPa (psig) P is the internal pressure in kPa (psig), and D and T are the outside pipe diameter and nominal wall thickness, respectively, in mm (in.). 

For a food whose flow behavior follows the Casson model, a straight line results when the square root of shear rate, (y), is plotted against the square root of shear stress, (cr) , with slope Kc and intercept Kqc (Figure 2-2). The Casson yield stress is calculated as the square of the intercept, ctoc = (Kocf and the Casson plastic viscosity as the square of the slope, r]ca = The data in Figure 2-2 are of Steiner (1958) on a chocolate sample. The International Office of Cocoa and Chocolate has adopted the Casson model as the official method for interpretation of flow data on chocolates. However, it was suggested that the vane yield stress would be a more reliable measure of the yield stress of chocolate and cocoa products (Servais et al., 2004). 

Figure 4. Predicted axial strain response for plane stress (PST) calculations with internally full and reduced constraint and predicted axial and bending strain response for interally fully constraint generalized plane strain (GPE) calculations by the incremental Mori-Tanaka approach...

Fig. 10.10 Internal stresses. Tint, calculated according to Eq. (10.12) for selected clathrates...

Finite element analysis is nothing new it started in the early 1960s with the first available computers. It is an engineering, scientific tool to calculate especially highly complex mechanical structures. Because the method is based on numerical algorithms, its use increased widely as more powerful computers available became. Especially the visualization possibilities for non-engineers are excellent. As a primary result we calculate the overall deformation in every direction and second internal stress is calculated. The basic procedure of a finite element analysis starts with the abstraction of... 

Cobalt deposition is associated with a high internal stress in the deposit. As more cobalt is deposited, the cobalt deposit tends to peel off fi-om the cathode. It is important to know how the cobalt deposition stress changes as the operation conditions vary. The cobalt deposition stress was calculated according to the method given by Specialty Testing Development Co. and discussed by Leaman [15]. After the cobalt deposition, the cathode was bent toward the anode. 

The calculation was carried out using the ANSYS F.E.M. code. The pressure vessel was meshed with a 4 nodes shell element. Fig. 18 shows a view of the results of calculation of the sum of principal stresses on the vessel surface represented on the undeformed shape. For the calculation it was assumed an internal pressure equal to 5 bar and the same mechanical characteristics for the test material. 

Returning to the Maxwell element, suppose we rapidly deform the system to some state of strain and secure it in such a way that it retains the initial deformation. Because the material possesses the capability to flow, some internal relaxation will occur such that less force will be required with the passage of time to sustain the deformation. Our goal with the Maxwell model is to calculate how the stress varies with time, or, expressing the stress relative to the constant strain, to describe the time-dependent modulus. Such an experiment can readily be performed on a polymer sample, the results yielding a time-dependent stress relaxation modulus. In principle, the experiment could be conducted in either a tensile or shear mode measuring E(t) or G(t), respectively. We shall discuss the Maxwell model in terms of shear. 

Equations 1 to 3 enable the stresses which exist at any point across the wall thickness of a cylindrical shell to be calculated when the material is stressed elastically by applying an internal pressure. The principal stresses cannot be used to determine how thick a shell must be to withstand a particular pressure until a criterion of elastic failure is defined in terms of some limiting combination of the principal stresses. 

If it is assumed that uniform tensile stress, like uniform compressive stress (7), has no significant effect on yield, then the yield pressure of a cylinder subjected solely to an internal pressure may be calculated from... 

The residual shear stress distribution in the assembled cylinders, prior to the appHcation of internal pressure, may be calculated, from pressure P, generated across the interface. The resulting shear stress distribution in the compound cylinder, when subjected to an internal pressure may be calculated from the sum of the residual stress distribution and that which would have been generated elastically in a simple cylinder of the same overall radius ratio as that of the compound cylinder. 

In contrast to the flexibiUty method, the stiffness method considers the displacements as unknown quantities in constmcting the overall stiffness matrix (K). The force vector T is first calculated for each load case, then equation 20 is solved for the displacement D. Thermal effects, deadweight, and support displacement loads are converted to an equivalent force vector in T. Internal pipe forces and stresses are then calculated by applying the displacement vector [D] to the individual element stiffness matrices. 

If the diameter of the bottle is 160 mm, calculate the hoop and axial strains in the bottle wall when an internal pressure of 200 kN/m is applied. Calculate also the stresses in the individual layers. 

Operator error probabilities were estimated using NUREG/CR-4910 normalized to errors determined in the internal events analysis. This allowed for varying number of personnel, amount of time available, and stress level. When more pessimistic values were substituted for best estimate values, the calculated core melt frequency increased by a factor of at least three. 

As the most notable contribution of ab initio studies, it was revealed that the different modes of molecular deformation (i.e. bond stretching, valence angle bending and internal rotation) are excited simultaneously and not sequentially at different levels of stress. Intuitive arguments, implied by molecular mechanics and other semi-empirical procedures, lead to the erroneous assumption that the relative extent of deformation under stress of covalent bonds, valence angles and internal rotation angles (Ar A0 AO) should be inversely proportional to the relative stiffness of the deformation modes which, for a typical polyolefin, are 100 10 1 [15]. A completly different picture emerged from the Hartree-Fock calculations where the determined values of Ar A0 AO actually vary in the ratio of 1 2.4 9 [91]. 

The choice of basis set in ab initio calculations has been the subject of numerous theoretical studies. Early SCF calculations utilized mainly spht-va-lence basis sets such as 3-21G and 4-31G. The importance of inclusion of d polarization functions on sulfur atoms has been stressed by several authors. For instance, Suleimenov and Ha found that the omission of d polarization functions leads to a substantially lower barrier for the internal rotation ( 16 kj mol for the central bond of H2S4) and produces an unreahstically large S-S bond length for the most stable rotamer [4]. In general, the use of... 

---