Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stochastic algorithm calculations

The Boltzmaim weight appears implicitly in the way the states are chosen. The fomi of the above equation is like a time average as calculated in MD. The MC method involves designing a stochastic algorithm for stepping from one state of the system to the next, generating a trajectory. This will take the fomi of a Markov chain, specified by transition probabilities which are independent of the prior history of the system. [Pg.2256]

Monte Carlo (MC) methods can address the time gap problem of MD. The basis of MC methods is that the deterministic equations of the MD method are replaced by stochastic transitions for the slow processes in the system.3 MC methods are stochastic algorithms for exploring the system phase space although their implementation for equilibrium and non-equilibrium calculations presents some differences. [Pg.320]

This algorithm has been used in the integration of the Langevin equation applied to the buffer zone atoms in the stochastic boundary molecular dynamics method (Chapt. IV.C), as well as in other stochastic dynamics calculations.102... [Pg.53]

One final note While the techniques used here were applied to control temperature In large, semi-batch polymerization reactors, they are by no means limited to such processes. The Ideas employed here --designing pilot plant control trials to be scalable, calculating transfer functions by time series analysis, and determining the stochastic control algorithm appropriate to the process -- can be applied In a variety of chemical and polymerization process applications. [Pg.486]

We adapt our model for numerical simulation with the help of the Gillespie algorithm [10], which enables the system to jump to the next event via the calculation of the waiting time before any event will occur. Following the approach suggested by us [50], we stochastically model the system where several events can happen with different probabilities. Suppose that in some moment of time we have a set of N probable events with rates Ri, where the i — th event has the rate Ri and i = 1... N. Then by generating two uniformly distributed in (0, 1) random numbers RN and RN2, we estimate the time T after which the next event would occur as ... [Pg.385]

As we shall see, this volume concentrates on methods which are stochastic, rather than deterministic, in nature - that is, the route that they take in seeking a solution depends in some way upon chance (and, as an important consequence, the solution found may vary from one invocation of the algorithm to the next). Although stochastic methods are not as familiar to most chemists as analytical methods, examples of their use are still widespread. Monte Carlo calculations, which combine a statistical approach with the chance nature of random events, have been widely used in fields such as molecular dynamics, but Monte Carlo is only suited to a restricted range of problems. [Pg.4]

A recently introduced algorithm, called stochastic proximity embedding (SPE), is a novel self-organizing scheme that addresses the key limitations of Isomap (isometric feature mapping) and LLE. SPE builds on the same geodesic principle first proposed and exploited in Isomap, but introduces two algorithmic advances SPE circumvents the calculation of estimated geodesic distances, and uses a pairwise refinement scheme that does not require the complete distance, or proximity, r, matrix. Due to these advances, the method scales linearly with the number of points. [Pg.150]

The upper bound 2. 0 is to be regarded as an artifact of the perturbation criterion we adopted for calculating Q2(x) in Eq. (5.25). In order to check the rehability of our treatment, we carried out a numerical simulation of the stochastic system (5.2). A detailed description of the numerical algorithm is available elsewhere. The comparison between the analytical expression for P(x) and the result of our simulation is illustrated in Fig. 3. We note that the agreement with our predictions is fairly close. The lower bound for j(f) is correctly recovered, while a long tail lingers over the limiting value 2sq. Such a constraint is expected to disappear as we proceed further with our perturbation method. [Pg.525]


See other pages where Stochastic algorithm calculations is mentioned: [Pg.76]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.932]    [Pg.933]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.140]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.418 ]




SEARCH



Stochastic algorithm

© 2024 chempedia.info