Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steady state structure

Fig. 1.18. Distribution of A and B particles on the surface in the annihilation reaction A + B —> 0. For clarity, the distributions of A s and B s have been separated and are shown in the left-hand column and in the right-hand column of the figure, respectively. The results shown correspond to constant and equal fluxes of A and B. The simulation were carried out on a 100 x 100 square lattice, (a) The A and B distribution are complementary. A narrow lane of empty sites separates between them, (b) The long-time (near steady-state) structure of the overlayer developing from the initial condition in (a), (c) The long-time overlayer pattern developing from an initially empty lattice. Fig. 1.18. Distribution of A and B particles on the surface in the annihilation reaction A + B —> 0. For clarity, the distributions of A s and B s have been separated and are shown in the left-hand column and in the right-hand column of the figure, respectively. The results shown correspond to constant and equal fluxes of A and B. The simulation were carried out on a 100 x 100 square lattice, (a) The A and B distribution are complementary. A narrow lane of empty sites separates between them, (b) The long-time (near steady-state) structure of the overlayer developing from the initial condition in (a), (c) The long-time overlayer pattern developing from an initially empty lattice.
Several groups have studied the effects on the muscle low-angle diffraction pattern of applying various mechanical perturbations to steady-state structures, either isometric contractions or rigor muscle at various strain levels. Huxley et al. (1981, 1983) used whole frog muscles and followed the effects of step changes of length of various amplitudes applied at the plateau of an otherwise isometric tetanus. They studied the effects on the M3 intensity as a whole. More recendy, with the two components of the active M3 resolved, Huxley et al. (2003) and Reconditi et al. (2003) have studied the separate behavior of these components. Huxley et al. (2003) found that the intensity ratio of the M30 to M3 varied from an initial value... [Pg.239]

Figure 3.47 shows the evolution of the heating process of the composite block and how it attains a complex steady state structure with the surface zones covered by complicated isothermal curves (see also Fig. 3.46). Secondly, this figure shows how the brick with the higher thermal conductivity is at steady state and remains the hottest during the dynamic evolution. As explained above, this fact is also shown in Fig. 3.46 where all high isothermal curves are placed in the area of the brick with highest thermal conductivity. At the same time an interesting vicinity effect appears because we observe that the brick with the smallest conductivity does not present the lowest temperature in the centre (case of curve G compared with curves A and B). The comparison of curves A and B, where we have X = 0.2, with curves C and D, where X = 0.4, also sustains the observation of the existence of a vicinity effect. In Fig. 3.48, we can also observe the effect of the highest thermal conductivity of one block but not the vicinity effect previously revealed by Figs. 3.46 and 3.47. If we compare the curves of Fig. 3.47 with the curves of Fig. 3.48 we can appreciate that a rapid process evolution takes place between T = 0 and T = 1. Indeed, the heat transfer process starts very quickly but its evolution from a dynamic process to steady state is relatively slow. Figure 3.47 shows the evolution of the heating process of the composite block and how it attains a complex steady state structure with the surface zones covered by complicated isothermal curves (see also Fig. 3.46). Secondly, this figure shows how the brick with the higher thermal conductivity is at steady state and remains the hottest during the dynamic evolution. As explained above, this fact is also shown in Fig. 3.46 where all high isothermal curves are placed in the area of the brick with highest thermal conductivity. At the same time an interesting vicinity effect appears because we observe that the brick with the smallest conductivity does not present the lowest temperature in the centre (case of curve G compared with curves A and B). The comparison of curves A and B, where we have X = 0.2, with curves C and D, where X = 0.4, also sustains the observation of the existence of a vicinity effect. In Fig. 3.48, we can also observe the effect of the highest thermal conductivity of one block but not the vicinity effect previously revealed by Figs. 3.46 and 3.47. If we compare the curves of Fig. 3.47 with the curves of Fig. 3.48 we can appreciate that a rapid process evolution takes place between T = 0 and T = 1. Indeed, the heat transfer process starts very quickly but its evolution from a dynamic process to steady state is relatively slow.
The ratio /t often is termed the response function, or the burning-rate response, and combustion-zone analyses typically provide magnitudes of order unity for it. Therefore, equation (52) indicates that y is of the same order of magnitude as the Mach number of mean flow of the burnt gas. This observation enables the order of magnitude of the growth or decay rate to be estimated directly from equation (30). More accurate computations necessitate calculating Re /x. The many different possibilities for steady-state structures of the combustion zone indicated in Chapter 7 imply that many different analyses can be relevant to the calculation of /i. Here we shall outline only two and comment on other approaches. [Pg.318]

Quite different behavior is exhibited by the topologically constrained model, as illustrated by Fig. 89, which shows the dynamic evolution of the topologically constrained model out to 12,000 Monte Carlo sweeps, for r = A, r=1.2 (at this temperature, the order parameter large-amplitude density fluctuations such as those observed in the topologically unconstrained model are absent. [Pg.697]

It is obvious from the above discussion that the existing number of observations is insufficient to allow the formulation of a general catalytic reaction scheme for these enz5mies. In spite of the differences in the presteady state behavior of fungal and Rhus laccases, it seems unlikely that they utihze different catalytic mechanisms, and the two enzymes probably behave identically during steady state catalysis. Elucidation of the mechanism will thus require knowledge of their steady state structure and behavior. [Pg.26]

Under steady-state flow conditions, the morphology is fully defined by the dynamic breakup and coalescence processes. However, behind is an implicit assumption that the flow conditions are strong enough to erase the initial morphology. The presence of the critical value of shear rate, Yct, has been documented (Minale et al. 1997). The authors reported that the unique morphology was observed only above ycr- Below this limit, multiple pseudo-steady-state structures were observed for the model PDMS/PIB system. No attempt was made to generalize this observation. In principle, the phenomenmi should be related to the critical value of the capillary number, Kcr, and a ratio of the polymer(s) relaxation time to... [Pg.806]

In this chapter, electrochemical properties of ET proteins at electrode interfaces studied by spectroelectrochem-ical techniques are described. In situ spectroelectrochemical techniques at well-defined electrode surfaces are sufficiently selective and sensitive to distinguish not only steady state structures and oxidation states of adsorbed species but also dynamics of reactants, products, and intermediates at electrode surfaces on a monolayer level. The spectroelectrochemical techniques used in studies of ET proteins include IR reflection-absorption, potential-modulated UV-vis reflectance (electroreflectance), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and surface plasmon resonance, total internal reflection fluorescence, (TIRE) and absorbance linear dichroism spectroscopies. [Pg.5636]

This presentation of the LH theory considers a very simple case, namely a homopolymer of intermediate or high molar mass. Fold length fluctuation is not considered in this simple treatment. A secondary nucleus is first formed and it spreads out laterally at the rate g. The thickness of the stem along the growth (G) direction is b. It is not necessary for the steady-state structure of the growing crystals to be smooth. In fact two of the three regimes of crystallization that are defined by the LH theory are characterized by a surface which contains several patches on to which stems are deposited. [Pg.179]

Shear-rate dependence of steady-state structures... [Pg.749]


See other pages where Steady state structure is mentioned: [Pg.70]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.1511]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.379]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]




SEARCH



STEADY-STATE CALCULATIONS FOR CONTROL STRUCTURE SELECTION

Steady-states structuring fields 84

Structure states

© 2024 chempedia.info