Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steady-states structuring fields 84

PMMA/ABS blends, the plot of C versus composition was nonlinear, with C = 1 found only for PMMA homopolymer. Variation of this structural parameter seems to be related to differences of morphology existing in d5mamic and steady-state flow fields (Utracki 1989). [Pg.845]

Ensemble Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have been the popular tools to investigate the steady-state and transient electron transport in semiconductors theoretically. In particular, the steady-state velocity field characteristics have been determined using the Monte Carlo method for electric field strengths up to 350kVcm in bulk wurtzite structure ZnO at lattice temperatures of 300, 450, and 600 K [158]. The conduction bands ofwurtzite-phase ZnO structure were calculated using FP-LMTO-LDA method. For the MC transport simulations, the lowest F valley (Fi symmetry) and the satellite valleys located at F (F3 symmetry) and at U point, f/rmn (Efi symmetry), which is located two-thirds of the way between the M and L symmetry points on the edge of the Brillouin zone, have been considered. [Pg.69]

Steady-state solutions are found by iterative solution of the nonlinear residual equations R(a,P) = 0 using Newton s methods, as described elsewhere (28). Contributions to the Jacobian matrix are formed explicitly in terms of the finite element coefficients for the interface shape and the field variables. Special matrix software (31) is used for Gaussian elimination of the linear equation sets which result at each Newton iteration. This software accounts for the special "arrow structure of the Jacobian matrix and computes an LU-decomposition of the matrix so that qu2usi-Newton iteration schemes can be used for additional savings. [Pg.309]

Photoinduced spin-related phenomena are a particularly important field of the solid-state photophysics, because fast spin switching is a prospective basis for applications in the field of spintronics. An illustrative example is the production of the metastable state of the iron propyltetrazole (ptz) complex [Fe(ptz)6](BF4)2 by laser light-induced excited spin-state trapping (LIESST) and the determination of the resulting structure by steady-state X-ray photodiffraction [68]. In another example, steady-state X-ray photodiffraction at cryogenic temperatures was successfully utilized to study photoinduced phase transition due to spin crossover in the tris(a-picolylamine)iron(II) complex [69]. The phase transition is accompanied by... [Pg.123]

The basic parameters which determine the kinetics of internal oxidation processes are 1) alloy composition (in terms of the mole fraction = (1 NA)), 2) the number and type of compounds or solid solutions (structure, phase field width) which exist in the ternary A-B-0 system, 3) the Gibbs energies of formation and the component chemical potentials of the phases involved, and last but not least, 4) the individual mobilities of the components in both the metal alloy and the product determine the (quasi-steady state) reaction path and thus the kinetics. A complete set of the parameters necessary for the quantitative treatment of internal oxidation kinetics is normally not at hand. Nevertheless, a predictive phenomenological theory will be outlined. [Pg.211]

The presence of a trapping center is very important since Eq. (19) indicates that the steady-state strength of the photoinduced space-charge field depends on the number density of the deep traps. Nevertheless, the nature of the traps in organic PR materials is the least studied of all the elements for the PR effect. The main reason is the lack of structural information of the trapping centers. The amorphous nature of these materials warrants the existence of a variety of trapping centers, such as energy levels localized at impurities or structural defects. However, one can differentiate between deep traps, which are localized... [Pg.274]

In field-flow fractionation, a component undergoing flow transport through a thin channel is forced sideways against a wall by an applied field or gradient. The component is confined to a narrow region adjacent to the wall, by a combination of the wall s surface, which it cannot pass, and the driving force, which prevents its escape toward the center of the channel. The component molecules or particles soon establish a thin steady-state distribution in which outward diffusion balances the steady inward drift due to the field. The structure and dimensions of this layer determine its behavior in the separation process. [Pg.116]

In the filtration-type methods (the first three techniques listed above), components accumulate as a steady-state (polarization) layer at a barrier or membrane [4] this occurs in much the same way as in field-flow fractionation or equilibrium sedimentation. However, there are several complications. First, fresh solute is constantly brought into the layer by the flow of liquid toward and through the filter. This steady influx of solute components can be described by a finite flux density term J0. Second, components can be removed from the outer reaches of the layer by stirring. Third, the membrane or barrier may be leaky and thus allow the transmission of a portion of the solute, profoundly affecting the attempted separation. In fact, one reason for our interest in layer structure is that leakiness depends on the magnitude of the solute buildup at the membrane surface. As solute concentration at the surface increases, more solute partitions into the membrane and is carried on through by flow. [Pg.117]

First, the current state of affairs is remarkably similar to that of the field of computational molecular dynamics 40 years ago. While the basic equations are known in principle (as we shall see), the large number of unknown parameters makes realistic simulations essentially impossible. The parameters in molecular dynamics represent the force field to which Newton s equation is applied the parameters in the CME are the rate constants. (Accepted sets of parameters for molecular dynamics are based on many years of continuous development and checking predictions with experimental measurements.) In current applications molecular dynamics is used to identify functional conformational states of macromolecules, i.e., free energy minima, from the entire ensemble of possible molecular structures. Similarly, one of the important goals of analyzing the CME is to identify functional states of areaction network from the entire ensemble of potential concentration states. These functional states are associated with the maxima in the steady state probability distribution function p(n i, no, , hn). In both the cases of molecular dynamics and the CME applied to non-trivial systems it is rarely feasible to enumerate all possible states to choose the most probable. Instead, simulations are used to intelligently and realistically sample the state space. [Pg.264]


See other pages where Steady-states structuring fields 84 is mentioned: [Pg.167]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.1049]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.1157]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.173]   


SEARCH



Steady state structure

Structure states

© 2024 chempedia.info