Statistics selection bias

Bather J (1992) Response adaptive allocation and selection bias. In Flournoy N, Rosenberger WF (eds), Adaptive Designs. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA. 

Longford NT (1999) Selection bias and treatment heterogeneity in clinical trials. Statistics in... 

Robins, J.M., A. Rotnitzky, and D.O. Scharfstein. Sensitivity analysis for selection bias and unmeasmied confoimding in missing data and causal inference models. In M.E. HaUoran and D. Berry (eds.). Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment and Clinical Trials, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications. Springer, New York, 1999. 

One can regard the concept of individual risk scores similar to letting the number of subgroup go to infinity so that each individual forms their own subgroup. To develop a risk calculator for a clinically important event after exposure to a pharmaceutical product will require a large amount of data. In our opinion, the latter may become possible with advancements in computing technology and our ability to access data in claims database and electronic medical records. Statisticians should participate in such efforts to ensure that appropriate statistical methods are used to address possible sources of bias, especially selection bias, that are often associated with data from nonrandomized sources. 

Meta-Analysis. Meta-analysis is a widely used method that employs statistical analysis to synthesize the findings of a number of independent studies. Meta-analyses assume that random variation accounts for differences in results from one study to another. These analyses require both statistical expertise and extensive clinical knowledge of the topic. Weaknesses of meta-analyses are implicit in the process. The included studies may have measured slightly different outcomes, they may have used different research designs, and there may have been selection bias in the criteria used to include a study. 

Since the bias function should enhance the sampling of pathways with important work values it can be made to depend on the work only, ir[z 2 ) = n W( (. Z))]. To minimize the statistical error in the free energy difference the bias function needs to be selected such that both the statistical errors of the numerator and the denominator of (7.44) are small. Ideally, the bias function should have a large overlap with both the unbiased work distribution P(W) and the integrand of (7.36), P (W) exp (—j3W). Just as Sun s work-biased ensemble Pa[z( ), the biased path ensemble )] can... 

A sample is selected by a random process to eliminate problems of bias in selection and/or to provide a basis for statistical interpretation of measurement data. There are three sampling processes which give rise to different types of random sample ... 

Comment. Any of the above may be used. Problems with IARC selection method include two sexes, two or more strains will have different intervals for the same compound. Different interval selection methods will produce different statistical significance levels. This may produce bias and requires an isotonic tumor prevalence for ready analysis. 

There are three assumptions about sampling which are common to most of the statistical analysis techniques that are used in toxicology. These are that the sample is collected without bias, that each member of a sample is collected independently of the others and that members of a sample are collected with replacements. Precluding bias, both intentional and unintentional, means that at the time of selection of a sample to measure, each portion of the population from which that selection is to be made has an equal chance of being selected. Ways of precluding bias are discussed in detail in the section on experimental design. 

Case-control and convenience-cohort studies are susceptible to unobserved differences between experimental- and control-group members. This leads to selection and detection bias, which accounts for the alternative explanations of the observed statistical relationship between exposure and disease incidence. The best individual-level epidemiological studies go to great lengths to avoid bias, use large numbers of people, and study large exposures. 

---