Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Static toughness

Eqs. 1-5 hold whether failure is interfacial or cohesive within the adhesive. Furthermore, Eq. 5 shows that the reversible work of adhesion directly controls the fracture energy of an adhesive joint, even if failure occurs far from the interface. This is demonstrated in Table 5, which shows the static toughness of a series of wedge test specimens with a range of adherend surface treatments. All of these samples failed cohesively within the resin, yet show a range of static toughness values of over 600%. [Pg.450]

These results imply that both CAI strength and the fatigue Unfit of impact-damaged laminates will be dependent on the Gic static toughness values for comparable impact damage levels. [Pg.247]

It is generally considered that dynamic fracture toughness is lower than static toughness in many metallic materials however, in the case of PSZ, the dynamic fracture toughness appears to be higher than the static. This is apparently related to the stress-induced phase transformation which occurs in PSZ. [Pg.103]

The inplane shear stress-strain tests reported here have been well demonstrated by other researchers (19) as a reliable test for matrix-dominated properties in composites. For all the selected mechanical properties that we monitored (UTS, Gg, static toughness, O and E), their sensitivity to the thermal history was well demonstrated. In particular. [Pg.640]

Evidently, they are quite different. The latter exhibits typical brittle failure and presents unstable crack propagation after the maximum force. In contrast, in the nanocomposite crack formation took much longer time and crack propagation was somewhat stabilized before final firacture [27]. The results clearly manifest that the above-proposed methodology is feasible to improw notch ductility of PP. What is more, the area under the tensile stress-strain curve, a measure of static toughness of the nanocomposite, is also prominently increased (Table 3.2). [Pg.129]

The upper limit assumed in Fig. 15.16 for the applied Kj is, obviously, that of the static toughness of the material Kje- Once this value is reached brittle fracture is triggered. The lower bound of Kj is Kj cc so that it is Kj cc < Kic- When this is the case, Kjsec replaces Kje as the controlling factor for the safety assessment of a structure since SCC is so fast that time to failure cannot be considered in a structural analysis. The ratio of KjscJKjc is, therefore, a measure of toughness reduction caused by SCC. In reality it is not precisely a toughness reduction since Kje remains the same, but rather a substitution of Kje with Kjsec-... [Pg.744]

The main results of this miero-mechanical model in the quasi-static regime have been compared with experimental results obtained by placing polystyrene (PS)-polyvinyl pyridine (PVP) diblock copolymers with a short PVP block between PS and PVP homopolymers. The fracture toughness was found to increase linearly with E from that of the bare PS/PVP interface, while the slope of the line increased with the degree of polymerization of the block being pulled out. If the data for the different copolymers were plotted as AG vs. (where... [Pg.226]

The subject of strength is much more complex than stiffness, since so many different types exist short or long term, static or dynamic, etc. (Chapter 2). Some strength aspects are interrelated with those of toughness. The crystallinity of TPs is important for their short term yield strength. Unless the... [Pg.380]

Fig. 6.10. Schematics of the dependence of total fracture toughness, on fiber volume fraction of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites at different loading rates (a) static loading (b) dynamic... Fig. 6.10. Schematics of the dependence of total fracture toughness, on fiber volume fraction of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites at different loading rates (a) static loading (b) dynamic...
Russell, A.J. and Street, K.N. (1987). The effect of matrix toughness on delamination static and fatigue fracture under mode I and II shear loading of graphite fiber composites. In Toughened Composites. ASTM STP 937 (N.J. Johnston ed.). ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 257-294. [Pg.364]

The SpinTek system does not destroy the wastes but rather separates and concentrates them. Thus, additional treatment technologies may be required. In addition, the vendor points out that the system is not for every application in that it is designed for tough applications where normal static membrane filtration works poorly or not at all. [Pg.993]

Structural applications of composite materials require not only acceptable static mechanical properites but the ability to withstand the generation and propagation of cracks without premature failre. For example, impact resistance, fracture toughness and fatigue resistance are desireable composite properties. Fiber-matrix structure at the interphase can affect the values attainable for these properties. [Pg.23]


See other pages where Static toughness is mentioned: [Pg.449]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.3073]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.3073]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.193]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.449 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.449 ]




SEARCH



Quasi-static fracture toughness

Tough

© 2024 chempedia.info