Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Starch protein content

The protein fraction is filtered and dried to become high (60%) protein content com gluten meal. The starch slurry can be dewatered and dried to produce regular com starch. Dry starch can be sold as is or heat treated in the presence of acid catalysts to produce dextrins. Or, it is chemically modified before dewatering and drying to produce modified starches used in food and industrial appHcations. Lasdy, it can be hydroly2ed to produce corn sweeteners. [Pg.360]

Most nuts for commercial use are characteri2ed by high oil and protein contents (see Proteins) as well as a low percentage of carbohydrates (qv). However, some varieties, mostly inedible tree nuts such as acorn, horse chestnut, and chufa, contain at least as much sugar and/or starch as protein. The edible water chestnut is also in this category, as is the cashew nut, which contains starch in addition to a rich store of oil. The proximate composition of a number of nuts and of some nut products are given in Table 2 (3). [Pg.269]

Compressed yeast is also sold in supermarkets in 18-g and 56-g packages. Since this product contains approximately 10% added starch to increase its shelf life, it has a lower protein content and fermentative activity than the compressed yeast sold to bakeries. [Pg.389]

Our group has used twin-screw extrusion to produce many texturized whey-fortified puffed snacks. Whey protein has been blended with barley flour, com meal, rice flour, and wheat starch prior to extrusion, leading to corn puffs with a protein content of 20% instead of the usual 2% (Onwulata et al., 2001a). [Pg.192]

Dairy proteins can be used to boost the protein content of sfarch-based puffed snacks made from cornmeal fhey bind wafer and form doughy pastes with the starch, but not the non-TWPs. A wide possibility exists for creating new foods wifh fexfurized dairy proteins due to the availability of an extensive range of achievable sfates (Onwulafa et ah, 2010). [Pg.194]

It is not particularly easy to measure the degree of starch damage present. The usual method involves treating the flour with a-amylase, which can only attack the damaged starch. The procedure requires an a-amylase preparation that has to be standardised. Alternatively, an estimate can be made by optical microscopy or by calculating from the water absorption of the flour and its protein content, assuming that the water absorption that exceeds that to be expected from the protein alone is due to the damaged starch. [Pg.40]

Endosperm constitutes the main part of the corn kernel and consists of 85 to 90% starch, 8 to 10% protein, and a small amount of oil and other compounds. Corn endosperm can be divided into two distinct parts floury and horny endosperm. In floury endosperm, starch particles are round and are dispersed loosely in the protein matrix. In the horny endosperm, the protein matrix is stronger and starch particles are held more firmly. Starch granules are encased in the continuous protein matrix. The tighter setting in horny endosperm gives starch particles a polygonal shape. On average, the amount of horny endosperm in the corn kernel is twice that of the floury endosperm. However, this ratio is a function of the corn kernel protein content (Wolf et al., 1952). [Pg.153]

Singh, V., Haken, A.E., Dowd, M.K., Niu, Y.X., Zou, S.H., and Eckhoff, S.R. 1999a. Batch steeping of com Effects of adding lactic acid and sulfur dioxide at different times on starch yields, protein contents, and starch pasting properties. Cereal Chem. 76, 600-605. [Pg.170]

The composition of protein and starch fractions produced from pin milling and air classification are related to a number of variables variability in composition of field pea cultivars, number of passes through pin mill and air classifier, vane settings and protein content of peas, and seed moisture (5,9,23,31). [Pg.28]

Protein content of field peas is negatively correlated with lipid, cell wall material (CWM), sugar, and ash content and positively correlated with starch separation efficiency and protein separation efficiency in air classification of pea flour. The lower separation efficiency of low protein peas may be due to their high lipid and CWM content which makes disintegration of seeds and separation into protein and starch particles by pin milling difficult. It is suggested that peas with a specific protein content should be used in order to control the protein and starch fraction contents (18). [Pg.28]

As seed moisture in field peas decreases, there is a decrease in starch fraction yield, protein content of starch fraction, protein content of protein fraction, and percent starch separation efficiency, and a concurrent increase in protein fraction yield, percent starch in starch fraction, percent starch in protein fraction, percent protein separation efficiency, and percent neutral detergent fiber in the protein fraction. Lower moisture content of field peas improves milling efficiency and results in more complete separation of protein and starch fractions, which could explain the increase in protein fraction yield and percent starch in starch fraction, improved protein separation efficiency and less protein in the starch fraction. The decrease in starch separation efficiency was probably due to the increased starch content of protein fraction and increased protein fraction yield with lower seed moisture. [Pg.28]

On the basis of proteinate yields (Table II) and their protein contents (Table I), the recoveries of protein during wet processing were about 73% for both legumes, which was only slightly below the efficiency of the dry process. However, the losses of starch in the whey and wash solids were substantial, and starch recoveries averaged 77.5%. The yields of refined fiber were about 8% of the raw materials. Almost 30% of the dry matter from wet processing would have to be recovered from whey and wash extracts to make the process economical. [Pg.187]

Overall, the large number of significant differences among the fractions of all three bean types, reveals that the various minerals studied were not equally distributed among the fractions, except for sodium, but rather that partitioning occurred. Consistent with the ash values obtained, the protein flour fractions of the three bean types contained larger amounts of Fe, Mg, P, Z, and K whereas the starch II fractions contained smaller amounts of these minerals and Ca and Cu than the other flour fractions. Phytic acid content ranged from 8.7-30.2 mg/g for navy flours, from 4.3-23.7 mg/g for pinto flours. Total phosphorus content correlated well with both phytic acid content and protein content. Phytic acid content was... [Pg.198]

Walter et al. (38) measured the protein efficiency ratio (PER) of flour prepared from sweet potatoes which were cooked in a drying oven. Because the PER is determined on the basis of a diet containing 10% protein, the Jewel and Centennial sweet potatoes used in this study were stored until sufficient starch had metabolized to increase crude protein content to 11.25% (dry basis). When the flour was fed to Sprague-Dawley strain rats, the corrected PER values were 2.22 and 2.00 for Centennial and Jewel cultivars, respectively, compared to 2.50 for casein. Centennial had the highest PER value of the two cultivars because its NPN content was lower. The net effect of increased NPN content is to lower the amount of essential amino acids as a percentage of the total nitrogen and thus decrease the PER value. [Pg.243]

A summary of the proximate analyses of these yam tubers is shown in Table 1. On a fresh weight basis, protein is quite low because of the high water and starch contents of yams (dry weight protein content is 4-8%). Yams are rarely consumed alone but,... [Pg.267]

Lim, S. T, Lee, J. H., Shin, D. H., Lim, H. S. (1999). Comparison of protein extraction solutions for rice starch isolation and effects of residual protein content on starch pasting properties. Starch, 51, 120-125. [Pg.314]

Diets are isocaloric. The composition of the test and control (reference protein) diet (calculated on a dry weight basis) is 10% protein (1.6% nitrogen), 1 % AIN vitamin mix 76,3.5% AIN mineral mixture 76 (Nutritional Biochemicals), 0.2% choline bitartrate, 5% cellulose (only if test food is <5% total dietary fiber), corn oil to 10% total fat, and corn starch to total 100%. To account for differences in the protein content of the test diet, the level of corn starch can be adjusted (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, 1991). The chemical composition (proximate analysis) of the test protein must be measured before test diets are formulated. The proximate analysis of the test and control diets are to be measured after the diets are formulated, but before they are fed, to ensure that the protein content is the same for all diets, and that the diets are isocaloric. [Pg.136]


See other pages where Starch protein content is mentioned: [Pg.358]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.15]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.483 ]




SEARCH



Proteins protein content

Rice starches protein content

Starch content

Starch proteins

© 2024 chempedia.info