Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard Potentials. Electrochemical Behavior

Standard potentials for the following reactions of HN3 in aqueous solutions at 298 K were calculated from thermodynamic data  [Pg.116]


It should be noted that Lay and coworkers [12] have made a comparative study of the electrochemical behavior of ferrocene, 1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylferrocene and decamethylferrocene in 29 solvents and have concluded that increasing substitution on ferrocene reduces the solvent dependence of the ferrocene potential. Accordingly, they recommend that decamethylferrocene be adopted as a preferred reference standard for electrochemical measurements in nonaqueous... [Pg.995]

The most stable oxidation states for protactinium are Pa(V) and Pa(IV). The chemical behavior of Pa(V) closely mimics that of Nb(V) and Ta(V), and experimental data are consistent with a 5f(l) rather than a 6d(l) electron configuration for the Pa(IV) species [37]. The electrochemical literature for Pa is mainly focused on the characteristics of the Pa(V)/Pa(IV) couple and the electrodeposition of Pa metal films from aqueous and nonaqueous electrolyte solutions. In aqueous solutions, only Pa(V) and Pa(IV) ions are known to exist, and the standard potential for the Pa(V)/Pa(IV) redox couple is in the range of —0.1 to -0.32 V [38]. [Pg.1054]

An internal electrochemical mechanism was proposed long ago for deposition on certain metal substrates, since the rate of deposition sometimes depended on the nature of the substrate [11].) The standard potential of Reaction (5.3) is -l- 0.08 V, considerably more positive than the rednction potential of S to (-0.45 V). Free sulphide, if formed, would be in a very low concentration, since it will be removed continually by precipitation of PbS this will move the S rednction potential strongly positive according to the Nemst equation [Eq. (1.32)]. This positive shift will be even greater than normal because of the non-Nemstian behavior of the S /S couple when [S] > [S ] (at least in alkaline solntion) [12]. In opposition to this, the solubility of S in the (slightly acidic) aqneons solntions is very low, which will move the potential in the opposite direction. Add to this the very small concentration of S in acid solution [Eq. (1.15)], and it becomes clear that it is not trivial to estimate the feasibility of the formation of PbS by free snlphide. The non-Nemstian behavior of the sulphur-rich S /S couple and the lack of knowledge of the solnbility of free S in the deposition solntion are the two factors that complicate what would have been a tractable thermodynamic calcnlation. [Pg.202]

A major difference between electrochemistry performed at metal electrodes and that performed at semiconductor electrodes is that for a metal electrode, all the potential drop appears on the solution side of the metal-electrolyte interface, whereas for a semiconductor electrode, a portion of the potential drop occurs within the semiconductor material near the interface (within the so-called depletion or space-charge region, typically 10 nm to 1 pm thick). This additional built-in barrier to charge transfer at the interface means that the standard diagnostics for reversible electrochemical behavior are not applicable at a semiconductor electrode [ii]. [Pg.214]

Studies on the electrochemical behavior of ferrocene encapsulated in the hemi-carcerands 61 and 62, indicated that encapsulation induces substantial changes in the oxidation behavior of the ferrocene subunit [98]. In particular, encapsulated ferrocene exhibits a positive shift of the oxidation potential of c. 120 mV, probably because of the poor solvation of ferrocenium inside the apolar guest cavity. Lower apparent standard rate constants were found for the heterogeneous electron transfer reactions, compared to those found in the uncomplexed ferrocene under identical experimental conditions. This effect may be due to two main contributions (i) the increased effective molecular mass of the electroactive species and (ii) the increased distance of maximum approach of the redox active center to the electrode surface. [Pg.2158]

The electrochemical behavior of the A-D compounds (selected structures are shown in Fig. 16) agrees well with that expected on the basis of the electrochemical properties of both the donor and the acceptor moieties [134-138]. That they can be reversibly reduced and oxidized to the corresponding radical cation and anion has been ascertained by cyclic voltammetry. The standard reduction potentials, are close to the values found for the parent aromatic hydrocarbons or acridine [124]. In a similar way, the standard oxidation potentials, °, are congruent with those found for the corresponding amines [148]. The electrochemical reaction of A-D compounds can be formulated as follows ... [Pg.34]

The electrochemical properties of Cp TiC (Cp =Cp, Cp", Cs Me, CSH4CI, CsH4C02Me) in THF solution have been examined. These compounds undergo two reduction steps. The steric bulk of the pentamethyl and the possibility of chelation in the carbomethoxy derivative influence the electrochemical behavior. The standard potentials decrease to more negative values in the order CsF CC Me > C5H4CI > Cp > C5H4Me > Cp. 1125 The first reduction step of (CsIV SPr TiC in THF solution has been investigated by cyclic voltammetry.1126... [Pg.532]

This experiment involves advanced theory and substantial reagent preparation that requires outside-lab prep time. The goal of this experiment is to determine the standard reduction potentials (E°, V) for a series of substituted pentacyanoferrate(II) complexes. By comparing the electrochemical behavior of each AA ligand system, information about electronic structure and solution properties will be obtained. An introduction to cyclic voltammetry is given in Appendix 2. [Pg.94]

The corrosion behavior of metals cannot be predicted from the position of their standard potentials in the electrochemical series because the potential of an electrode changes with the current density. If an electrode in which only one electrode process takes place is termed a working electrode and the resultant potential, a working potential, then the differences between working potential and the Nernst equilibrium potential is called an overpotential, that is caused by reaction restraints. In general, polarization is defined as the shift in potential of working electrodes within a corrosion element. In such an element, at least two electrode reactions occur whose overpotentials are superimposed, resulting in the polarization effect. [Pg.539]

In the assessment of the refining performance of uranium, systematic data has been reported for the chemical properties of uranium complex in various alkali chlorides such as LiCl-RbCl and LiCl-CsCl mixtures [3-5], Information on the coordination circumstance of solute ions is also important since it should be correlated with stability. The polarizing power of electrolyte cations controls the local structure around neodymium trivalent Nd " " as an example of f-elements and the degree of its distortion from octahedral symmetry is correlated with thermodynamic properties of NdClg " complex in molten alkali chlorides [6]. On the other hand, when F coexists with Cr in melts, it is well-known that the coordination circumstances of solute ions are drastically changed because of the formation of fluoro-complexes [7-9]. A small amount of F stabilizes the higher oxidation states of titanium and induces a negative shift in the standard potentials of the Ti(IV)ITi(ni) and Ti(III)ITi(II) couples [7, 8], The shift in redox potentials sometimes causes specific electrochemical behavior, for example, the addition of F to the LiCl-KCl eutectic leads to the disproportionation of americium Am into Am " and Am metal [9],... [Pg.421]

The electrochemical behavior of sulfur, selenium, and tellurium was studied by Bodewig and Plambeck potentiometrically and voltammet-rically. The standard potentials for S/S, Se/Se , and Te +/Te couples were reported. The formation of Te was not observed. The anodic and cathodic waves in different systems were ascribed to 2S + 2C1 S2CI2 +2e, S + 2e -> S 2Se + 2C1 -> Se2Cl2(g) + 2e, Se + 2e -> Se , respectively. The observed blue color of S-S solution was ascribed to polysulfide ions. Shafir and Plambeck< reexamined the standard potentials of Ga +/Ga, In +/In+, and In+/In couples. The results were compared with those reported previously. [Pg.209]

M however, the n values were poorly defined. The wave heights were not proportional to concentrations of the solute at high concentrations, because of maxima formation. The electrochemical behavior of thorium in molten NaCl, NaCl-KCl, and KCl was studied by Smirnov et Their results indicated that thorium is in equilibrium with a mixture of Th + and Th" ". The standard electrode potentials for Th +/Th and Th" +/Th couples were reported. The equilibrium constant for Th" + -f- Th 2Th was obtained. [Pg.215]


See other pages where Standard Potentials. Electrochemical Behavior is mentioned: [Pg.116]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.939]    [Pg.1072]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.939]    [Pg.1072]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.4219]    [Pg.4559]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.208]   


SEARCH



Electrochemical behavior

Electrochemical potential

Potential standard

Potentials, standardization

Standard electrochemical potential

© 2024 chempedia.info