Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard chemical affinity

We can see that the relative yield of C molecules depends only on the thermodynamics of coupled reactions. It follows from these formulas that it is practically impossible to reach high conversion factor values if an energyconsuming reaction (2.39) is characterized by a negative value of the standard chemical affinity, = RTln K2 < 0. For example, if s/2 = — 30 kJ/mole (standard affinity for the reaction of ATP synthesis from ADP and Pi), then 2 6 10" and consequently rj 1. This result illustrates why the mechanism of indirect coupling of the two chemical reactions having a common intermediate cannot be efficient. Actually, according to the above-mentioned example, in order to form one molecule C we need to add more than 10 molecules B. [Pg.27]

This particular reaction has been chosen for the reason of its high value of standard chemical affinity for this reaction (j / = — 7.1 kcal/mole). As we noted above, due to this circumstance the system behavior can reveal the deviation from that prescribed by the classical Arrhenius mechanism. The conformational changes in malatdehydrogenase were tested by measuring the average life-time of intrinsic tryptophane fluorescence (ff). This parameter is known to be sensitive to the immediate surrounding of tryptophane residues. The chemical transformation of the substrate was detected from changes in the coenzyme redox state measured in terms of the sample optical density at 340 nm (NADH absorption maximum). [Pg.106]

The terms enclosed within parentheses in Eqs. (2.10) and (2.11) are respectively called the standard molar reaction Gibbs function change A,G and the standard chemical affinity A°. By setting up... [Pg.23]

If chemical "principles" were understood by philosophers to be invisible or visible matter, "cause" was understood to be invisible force. Like so many other chemists in the eighteenth century, Macquer and Baume assumed that the forces of chemical affinity are simply instances of physical forces. 18 They took Newton to be a student of these affinity forces, and they found congenial Peter Shaw s view that "it was by means of chemistry that Sir Isaac Newton has made a great part of his discoveries in natural philosophy." 19 The notion of the identity of chemical and physical force was based in the principle of economy, expressed in the standard form that similar effects "must arise from the same law, if we are not to multiply causes. "20... [Pg.79]

From the foregoing discussion, it follows that the standard exergy of one of the reactants can be estimated by use of the standard affinity of the reaction, provided that we know the values of the standard exergy of the other reactants and products. The numerical values of the molar exergy thus obtained of various chemical substances in the standard state (temperature T° = 298 K, pressure p° = 101.3 kPa, activity a° = 1) are tabulated as the standard chemical exergy of chemical substances in the literature on engineering thermodynamics [Ref. 9.]. [Pg.108]

In the case of solid substances the reference species is often set at the most stable solid compounds in lithospheric rocks. For example, metallic iron is most stable in the form of its oxides. The standard chemical exergy of metallic iron can then be obtained from the standard affinity Aaf of the formation of iron oxide, Fe +0.75O2 = 0.5Fe2O3 A° = e e + 0.75s 2 - 0.5 pe2Oj and = 0 hence e°c = A° -0.75e° . Table 10.3 shows the standard molar chemical exergy of a few substances relative to the solid reference species in the lithosphere at the standard temperature and pressure. [Pg.112]

Consider next the content of the first-order contribution to the activity coefficients in (6.33)-(6.35). Note that all of these contain the quantity GAA. Recall that GAA is a measure of the solute-solute affinity. In the limit of DI, the quantity GAA is still finite, but its effect on the activity coefficient vanishes in the limit pA — 0. It is quite clear on qualitative grounds that the standard chemical potential is determined by the solvent—solvent and solvent—solute affinities (this will be shown more explicitly in the next section). Thus, the effect of solute-solute affinity becomes operative only when we increase the solute concentration so that the solute molecules see each other, which is the reason for the appearance of GAA in (6.33)-(6.35). In addition to G(fA, relation (6.34) also includes C,AI1 and relation (6.35) also includes GBB. [Pg.162]

In actual practice, the change in the standard chemical potential (Ap°) is evaluated as the measure of the tendency of the solute to move from the solution to the fiber (i.e., the relative affinity of the substance for the fiber relative to the solution phase). This parameter is generally called the affinity and is usually expressed as ion affinities instead of as molecular affinities (see Table 5-18). One expression that describes the standard chemical potential, if the ion forms ideal solutions, is... [Pg.234]

Enhanced oil recovery research in the 1970s led to the development of empirical correlations that numerically describe the conditions for attaining ultra-low interfacial tension and maximum oil mobilization. The correlation, the surfactant affinity difference (SAD), is a measure of the difference between the standard chemical potentials or the Gibbs free energy of surfactant in the oil and water phase, as follows ... [Pg.258]

Therefore, it is of extraonUnaiy importance to realize the difference between statements about composition from ultimate principles and statements about chemical compounds and simple components listed in chemical affinity tables and the Tableau of 1787. Ultimate principles differed from perceptible chemical substances chiefly with respect to two peculiarities betraying their descent from the ancient Paracelsian principles first, they were thought to be recognizable only indirectly by the properties of the compounds in which they were contained second, they could not actually be separated as isolated pereeptible substances. In other words, they were not proven components according to the standards of the analytical method. It was not until the last quarter of the eighteenth century that chemists drew consequences and rejected this kind of chemical analysis. In 1782, Fourcroy explicitly dismissed the claim that components can be recognized by a compound s properties ... [Pg.123]

Traditionally, in chemical and biochemical literature, the chemical affinity, = — (dG/d(J)p and standard affinity, = RT ln are usually designated, correspondingly, as a free-energy change —AG and a standard free-energy change, — AG . To avoid any misinterpretation, we have to make two remarks (see also [8]) ... [Pg.12]

Empirical relationship are useful in practice, but their utilization could be made safer if they were related to some theoretical framework. The correlations are the numerical translation of the R = 1 concept in Winsor terminology. They are linear forms of all the formulation variables with no crossed term, so that the different variable effects are independent, which may seem to be too much of a coincidence. A few years after the correlations were empirically found, it was shown that they were actually a numerical expression for the surfactant affinity difference (SAD)-the difference between the negative of the standard chemical potential of the surfactant in the oil phase and the corresponding term for the water phase—in a three-phase optimum system [27,42,129] ... [Pg.288]

The standard affinity is a measure of the tendency of the dye to move from its standard state in solution to its standard state in the fibre, both at unit activity. For dyeing to have a large equilibrium constant, the standard chemical potential in the solution must be larger than that in the fibre, and the value of the standard affinity (-Ap ) is thus positive when K> I, ... [Pg.41]

Concerning the values of standard chemical adsorption potential (A/ra), the S-propranolol antipode possesses a higher affinity for the adsorbent than its enantiomer but taking into account the results obtained with other chiral species such as ibuprofen, adsorption of propranolol on this stationary phase is governed not only by the moieties containing the chiral carbon, but also primarily by the aromatic moieties in the structure of chiral selector. [Pg.294]


See other pages where Standard chemical affinity is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.5575]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.6448]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.341]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.30 ]




SEARCH



Chemical affinity

Standard affinity

Standard chemical

© 2024 chempedia.info