Standard affinity calculation

In this chapter we shall consider the application of tabulated values of affinities, heats and entropies of reaction to the calculation of equilibrium constants. As we have pointed out already it is much more convenient to consider standard affinities of reaction than equilibrium constants. This is because standard affinities can be added and subtracted in just the same way as stoichiometric equations, so that the standard affinity of a reaction not included in the table is easily calculated. This means, as we shall see, that the only reactions which need to be included are those relating to the formation of compounds from their elements. 

Calculation of the Standard Affinity for a Reaction which does not appear in the Table. 

The examples discussed in 3 and 4 show clearly the importance of tables of standard affinities and standard heats of formation, since from them we can calculate the thermodynamic behaviour of an almost unlimited number of reactions. 

Calculation of the Affinity for a given State of a System relative to the Standard Affinity. 

The physical stmcture of fibres, such as cellulose, greatly influences the dye sorption process. The accessible volume of fibre to dye is generally termed the internal accessible volume (V), which represents the internal void space, or pores, within a fibre. In thermodynamics of sorption, V is referred to as the volume of the internal phase per kilogram of dry fibre (Lkg" ). Determination of the internal volume of fibre greatly influences the calculation of standard affinity associated with sorption (-A[x°). It has been shown that V can be determined based on a two-phase dye sorption model, expressed in a hnear logarithmic form, according to a trial-and-error procedure. """ The uniform presentation of dye Uquor to the textile material is of obvious importance. 

In the course of pharmacological experiments, a frequent question is Does the experimental system return expected (standard) values for drugs With the obvious caveat that standard values are only a sample of the population that have been repeatedly attained under a variety of circumstances (different systems, different laboratories, different investigators), there is a useful statistical test that can provide a value of probability that a set of values agree or do not agree with an accepted standard value. Assume that four replicate estimates of an antagonist affinity are made (pKb values) to yield a mean value (see Table 11.14). A value of t can be calculated that can give the estimate probability that the mean value differs from a known value with the formula... 

The enthalpy of reaction 2.45 cannot be determined directly. As shown in figure 2.5, it is calculated by using several experimental quantities the standard enthalpy of formation of the solid alkoxide, the standard sublimation enthalpy and the ionization energy of lithium, and the standard enthalpy of formation and the adiabatic electron affinity of gaseous methoxy radical (equation 2.47). 

The standard enthalpy of this reaction is equal to the difference PA(K) — PA(B). Thus, the determination of PA(K) requires PA B). The proton affinity of B will rely, in turn, on the proton affinity of some other molecule and so on. A scale of relative values of proton affinities is thus built. To derive absolute data, a reliable anchor must be found. The one most frequently used is the proton affinity of ammonia, /M(NH3), which is now accepted to be 853.6 kJ mol-1 [67]. This is in excellent agreement with the result of a benchmark calculation by Martin and Lee,P (NH3) = 853.1 1.3 kJmol-1 [70],... 

When comparing literature data for the quantities addressed in this section, it is therefore essential to check if those data are consistent, that is, if they are based on the same value for the anchor. On the other hand, note that proton affinity, basicity, and acidity values do not depend on whether we follow the electron convention, the ion convention, or the electron FD convention. This is clearly evidenced by reactions 4.25 and 4.27, which do not involve the electron as a reactant or product species. However, it is also obvious that the values of the standard enthalpies of formation of AH+ and A-, calculated from PA(A) and A acid-7/0 (AB), respectively, will vary with the convention used to derive the standard enthalpy of formation of the proton. 

The types of values reported in the database standard enthalpies of formation at 298.15 K and 0 K, bond dissociation energies or enthalpies (D) at any temperature, standard enthalpy of phase transition—fusion, vaporization, or sublimation—at 298.15 K, standard entropy at 298.15 K, standard heat capacity at 298.15 K, standard enthalpy differences between T and 298.15 K, proton affinity, ionization energy, appearance energy, and electron affinity. The absence of a check mark indicates that the data are not provided. However, that does not necessarily mean that they cannot be calculated from other quantities tabulated in the database. 

The G2 set. Calculations of ionization energies and electron affinities for molecules and ions from the G2 set [47] were performed with P3 methods. The diversity of bonding in this set presents a convenient standard for testing the new methodology introduced here, such as electron affinity formulae and procedures for electron binding energies of open-shell systems. 

A limitation of the flow cytometric binding assay has been the precise determination of the receptor affinity and calculation of the receptors per cell. This limitation appears to have been overcome by the development of fluorescein and phycoerythrin compensation-calibration standards (Flow Cytometry Standards Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC). These standards have made it possible to quantify the fluorescence intensity of samples labeled with fluorescein or phycoerythrin, and relate the intensity to molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome. These standards have been utilized in quantitative studies of neutrophil chemoattractant-ligand interaction (4). 

A comparison of calculated and measured proton affinities (basicities) of nitrogen bases relative to the proton affinity of ammonia as a standard is provided in Table 6-17. The calculations correspond to the usual theoretical models, and the experimental data derive from equilibrium measurements in the gas phase. The data span a large range the proton affinity of the strongest base examined, quinuclidine, is some 27 kcal/mol greater than that of the weakest base, ammonia. 

This chapter gives a selected compilation of the standard and other characteristic (formal, half-wave) potentials, as well as a compilation of the constant of solubility and/or complex equilibria. Mostly, data obtained by electrochemical measurements are given. In the cases when reliable equilibrium potential values cannot be determined, the calculated values (calcd) for the most important reactions are presented. The data have been taken extensively from previous compilations [5-13] where the original reports can be found, as well as from handbooks [13-16], but only new research papers are cited. The constant of solubility and complex equilibria were taken from Refs 6-11,13,17-21. The oxidation states (OSs), ionization energies (IBs) (first, second, etc.), and electron affinities (EAs) of the elements and the... 

The outer-sphere one-electron reduction of CO2 leads to the formation of the 02 radical anion. In dry dimethylformamide, the C02/ C02 couple has been experimentally determined to be —2.21 V vs. standard calomel electrode (SCE) or approximately —2.6 V vs. the ferrocene/ferrocenium couple [21,22]. From pulse radiolysis experiments, the reduction potential of CO2 is —1.90 V vs. the SHE in water (—2.14 V vs. SCE) [23]. Theoretical calculations have been used to calculate the contributions of various factors to the reduction potential of CO2. These include the electron affinity of CO2,... 

---