Spring-block model

Fig. 4.2. A typical plot of the time variation of the potential energy (Et) of the spring-block model. Each discontinuity (almost vertical fall) in the potential energy correspond to an earthquake with the magnitude given by the energy release Er) corresponding to the fall. A plot of the frequency n Er) versus energy release (Er) on a log-log scale is indicated in the inset (cf. Burridge and Knopoff 1967).

Fig. 4.3. A simple spring-block model in one dimension. The system is spatially homogeneous, composed of equal masses m for each block, each connected to nearest neighbours (separated in equilibrium by a distance a) by springs of equal strength kq, and to a uniformly moving surface (with velocity V) with springs of equal strength ki. The system rests on a rough platform, which exerts a friction force / in the direction opposite to the relative motion and magnitude depending on the relative velocity of the block.

In another, somewhat more realistic automata model, Olami et al. (1992) (see Perez et al 1996 for a recent review) considered the mapping of the two-dimensional Burridge-Knopoff spring-block model into a cellular automata model. In fact, if one considers the two-dimensional geometry of the Burridge-Knopoff model as shown in Fig. 4.10, one can write for the total elastic force Fij on the block at site (i, j), from (4.4),... 

Numerous conceptual models have been used to simulate seismic cycles (see e.g. [8, 13, 22, 26, 36] and references therein). These include spring-block models and continuous cellular automata, which are so-called inherently discrete models that is, they are not obtained by discretizing the differential equations from a continuous model - the discreteness is an inherent feature of the imposed physics. In this section, we focus on the question, how the framework of conceptual models can be adjusted in order to simulate seismicity of a real fault region, e.g. the Parkfield segment of the San Andreas fault in California. 

The main difference of this Green s function to the nearest-neighbor interaction of spring-block models is the infinite-range interaction following a decay according to 1/r, where r is the distance between source cell and receiver point. 

The experimental studies on phase behavior and pattern formation reviewed here have been done on substrate-supported films of cylinder-forming polystyrene- foc -polybutadiene diblock (SB) [36, 43, 51, 111-114] and triblock (SBS) [49, 62, 115-117] copolymers (Table 1), lamella-forming polystyrene- /ocfc-poly(2-vinyl pyridine) diblock copolymers (SV) [118, 119] and ABC block terpolymers of various compositions [53, 63, 120-131], In simulation studies, a spring and bid model of ABA Gaussian chains has been used (see Sect. 2) [36,42, 58, 59],... 

The seismic analysis of the core is performed with the two-dimensional special purpose computer codes CRUNCH-2D and MCOCO, which account for the non-linearities in the structural design. Both CRUNCH-2D and MCOCO are based on the use of lumped masses and inertia concepts. A core element, therefore, is created as a rigid body while the element flexibilities are input as discrete springs and dampers at the corners of the element. CRUNCH-2D models a horizontal layer of the core and the core barrel structures (Figure 3.7-7). The model is one element deep and can represent a section of the core at any elevation, MCOCO models a strip of columns in a vertical plane along a core diameter and includes column support posts and core barrel structures (Figure 3.7-8). The strip has a width equal to the width of a permanent reflector block. Both models extend out to the reactor vessel,... 

An example for self-excited vibrations is the stick-slip phenomenon. In machining applications, stick-slip typically arises at the glides. The mechanical model can be seen in Fig. 12. The block of mass m is fixed to the moving wall by a spring of stiffness k and a dashpot of damping c. The wall is moving with velocity vq-The friction force acting on the block is... 

Figure 2.10 Model elements for viscoelastic simulations (from left linear spring element, linear dash pot element, nonlinear spring element, nonlinear dash pot element, sliding block (Saint-Venant body) with yield stress 9 (after Hennicke, 1978).

The Takayanagi Models Most polymer blends, blocks, grafts, and interpenetrating polymer networks are phase-separated. Frequently one phase is elastomeric, and the other is plastic. The mechanical behavior of such a system can be represented by the Takayanagi models (6). Instead of the arrays of springs and dashpots, arrays of rubbery (R) and plastic (P) phases are indicated (see Figure 10.6) (7). The quantities A and

indicated multiplications indicate volume fractions of the materials. 

---