Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spray deposition monitoring

Application verification (AV) monitors are devices that are placed within test plots to measure actual spray deposition that occurred during application. The main function of AV monitors is to show whether or not the intended amount of test material was actually deposited on the soil surface. Application monitors consisting of soil-filled containers, paper disks, polyurethane foam plugs, and glass Petri dishes have all been used successfully for this purpose. Prior to using a monitor in the field, it is important to determine that the test substance can indeed be successfully extracted from the monitor and that the compound will be stable on the monitor under field conditions... [Pg.862]

Spray deposition can be monitored using water-sensitive paper or glossy white cards in conjunction with an added coloured dye. Alternatively, a fluorescent... [Pg.108]

Bystanders. The bystander had the lowest exposure to carbaryl of all the workers monitored. In keeping the bystander within 100 feet and downwind of the ground applicator, the bystander often had to walk into the field while it was being treated. This practice resulted in exposure when the hands of the bystander touched the crop foliage. Thus, with peas, there was no exposure because the plants were too small at the time of spraying for any inadvertent contact, but with relatively mature potatoes, measurable residues were deposited on the bystander. For example, when 80S was applied to this crop, the bystander had a total HDE of 0.5 mg/h... [Pg.98]

Dispersants must always be applied with a system designed specifically for the purpose. If pesticide spray equipment is used, small droplets form that may blow away and not enough dispersant is deposited onto the oil slick. Unless suitably modified, fire monitors or regular hoses from ships may not result in correct droplet sizes or quantities of dispersant per unit area. Furthermore, the high velocity of the water/dispersant mixture can herd the oil away, resulting in the loss of dispersant to the water column, where it has little effect on oil floating on top of the water. [Pg.136]

Despite the problems discussed above, LIPS has been successfully applied in a number of process analysis applications. In some cases, the LIPS system has been used off-line as in the application described by Ottesen in which air cooled metallic substrates were used to collect fly ash deposits from a pulverised coal combustion for subsequent analysis off-line [70]. Calibration standards were prepared by spraying aqueous solutions onto heated substrates using an air brush and the method was found to work well provided that the deposits were sufficiently thin to permit complete ablation. Other workers have proposed on-line LIPS systems for process control. An example is the apparatus proposed by Sabsabi [71] for in situ analysis of pre-selected components of homogeneous solid compositions. In particular, the author proposed that the system could be used for measurement of the concentration of active ingredients (e.g. drugs) in pharmaceutical products such as tablets, by monitoring an element present in the active component (e.g. [Pg.961]

Single wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) network sensors were prepared as previously described (7-9). The carbon nanotube network (CNN) sensors were spray coated with a 0.1% by weight solution of polymer to a thickness of approximately 100 nm. These CNN sensors can be monitored simultaneously in capacitive and resistive mode. The capacitance was measured by applying a 0.1 V, 30 kHz, AC voltage between a conducting Si substrate and a S T network deposited on a thermal SiOa layer. The induced AC current was measured using a Stanford Research Systems SR830 lock-in amplifier. [Pg.73]

Sandroff and Burnett (1992) recently suggested a test for simulating the electrical leakage effects on circuit boards of ionic contamination derived from particles. The test is intended to simulate the effects of fine particle deposition, though it uses an atomized spray of an aqueous solution to deposit the contamination. Following drying, the test devices, usually circuit boards, are placed in a humidity chamber where their operation is monitored. [Pg.1014]


See other pages where Spray deposition monitoring is mentioned: [Pg.445]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.9247]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.1471]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.108 ]




SEARCH



Spray deposition

© 2024 chempedia.info