Space time algebra

D. Hestenes, Space Time Algebra (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1966)... 

QED theory is based on two distinct postulates. The first is the dynamical postulate that the integral of the Lagrangian density over a specified space-time region is stationary with respect to variations of the independent fields Atl and ijr, subject to fixed boundary values. The second postulate attributes algebraic commutation or anticommutation properties, respectively, to these two elementary fields. In the classical model considered here, the dynamical postulate is retained, but the algebraic postulate and its implications will not be developed in detail. 

Eqs. 1 to 3 relate the rate of production Rj of the balanced reaction component y to the molar amounts or their derivatives with respect to the time variable (reaction time or space time, see above). From the algebraic eq. 2 for the CSTR reactor the rate of production, Rj, may be calculated very simply by introducing the molar flow rates at the inlet and outlet of the reactor these quantities are easily derived from the known flow rate and the analytically determined composition of the reaction mixture. With a plug-flow or with a batch reactor we either have to limit the changes of conversion X or mole amount n7 to very low values so that the derivatives or dAy/d( //y,0) or dn7/d/ could be approximated by differences AXj/ (Q/Fj,0) or An7/A, (differential mode of operation), or to measure experimentally the dependence of Xj or nj on the space or reaction time in a broader region this dependence is then differentiated graphically or numerically. 

A guideline for choosing a suitable method is to avoid approximations as much as possible. Thus, plots of concentration, or a function of concentrations, versus time or reactor space time are preferred for evaluation of experiments with batch, tubular, and differential recycle reactors, in which concentrations are directly measured and rates can only be obtained by a finite-difference approximation (see eqns 3.1, 3.2, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.8). On the other hand, plots of the rate, or a function of the rate, versus concentration or a function of concentrations serve equally well for evaluation of results from CSTRs or differential reactors without recycle (gradientless reactors), where concentrations and rate are related to one another by algebraic equations that involve no approximations (see eqns 3.3, 3.4, or 3.7). 

The design formulation of nonisothermal CSTRs consists of ( / + 1) simultaneous, nonlinear algebraic equations. We have to solve them for different values of dimensionless space time, t. Below, we illustrate how to design nonisothermal CSTRs. 

The aim of this volume is twofold. First, it is an attempt to simplify and clarify the relativistic theory of the hydrogen-like atoms. For this purpose we have used the mathematical formalism, introduced in the Dirac theory of the electron by David Hestenes, based on the use of the real Clifford algebra Cl(M) associated with the Minkwoski space-time M, that is, the euclidean R4 space of signature (1,3). This algebra may be considered as the extension to this space of the theory of the Hamilton quaternions (which occupies an important place in the resolution of the Dirac equation for the central potential problem). 

In a fundamental article [35], Professor David Hestenes has introduced what he calls the Algebra of Space-Time (STA) in the Dirac theory of electron. STA is the Clifford algebra Cl(M) considered for its applications in Quantum Mechanics. 

To specify the weight factor, we realize that W°P1 must be independent of the specific potential V (since V is held constant over each interval). Moreover, the kernels at successive space-time points must be orthonormal to one another (otherwise the probabilities of localization at each space-time point are not mutually exclusive). These facts taken together lead to W°P] = yJn/lnihAt (which is independent of P because the time interval is the same between all successive space-time points) [66]. After a little algebra, we eventually obtain... 

At the entrance to the CSTR where x = 0, equation (I) again specifies the concentrations of the various alkanolamines in the feed stream. Algebraic manipulation of equations (I) to (L) followed by introduction of the definition of the space time for the CSTR yields the following set of three algebraic equations in three unknowns ... 

A. Benaini and Y. Robert. Space-time-minimal systolic arrays for gaussian elimination and the algebraic path problem. Parallel Computing, 15, pages 211-225, 1990. 

After a transient period that corresponds to about five times the space time, the reactor operates at steady state, that is, the composition of the reaction mixture is time invariant and the mass balance is reduced to a simple algebraic expression. 

This is a set of coupled integral equations that can be readily converted into a set of coupled algebraic equations for the space-time correlation functions Fy ... 

As the continuity equation has already been discussed in case study G7 Transient Diffusion, only the essential result is recalled here, which is that the operator describing its path is the space-time velocity algebraically written as a convection equation ... 

The three properties featuring the relaxation are two constitutive properties, capacitance and conductance, and one space-time property, evolution, as shown in the Formal Graph in the case study abstract and algebraically translated as follows ... 

Ferrara, S Gatto,R., Grillo.A.F. Conformal Algebra in Space-Time and Operator Product Expansion (Vol. 67)... 

The development of quantum electrodynamics saw the introduction of diagrammatic techniques. In particular, Feynman [28], in a paper entitled Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics, introduced diagrams which provide not only a pictorial representation of microscopic processes, but also a precise graphical algebra which is entirely equivalent to other formulations. They have a simplicity and elegance which is not shared by, for example, purely algebraic methods. 

The limitation of transfer function representation becomes plain obvious as we tackle more complex problems. For complex systems with multiple inputs and outputs, transfer function matrices can become very clumsy. In the so-called modem control, the method of choice is state space or state variables in time domain—essentially a matrix representation of the model equations. The formulation allows us to make use of theories in linear algebra and differential equations. It is always a mistake to tackle modem control without a firm background in these mathematical topics. For this reason, we will not overreach by doing both the mathematical background and the control together. Without a formal mathematical framework, we will put the explanation in examples as much as possible. The actual state space control has to be delayed until after tackling classical transfer function feedback systems. 

Concepts in quantum field approach have been usually implemented as a matter of fundamental ingredients a quantum formalism is strongly founded on the basis of algebraic representation (vector space) theory. This suggests that a T / 0 field theory needs a real-time operator structure. Such a theory was presented by Takahashi and Umezawa 30 years ago and they labelled it Thermofield Dynamics (TFD) (Y. Takahashi et.al., 1975). As a consequence of the real-time requirement, a doubling is defined in the original Hilbert space of the system, such that the temperature is introduced by a Bogoliubov transformation. 

Here D(rjtj,r2t2) is the photon propagator jcv, jpv, jfw are the four-dimensional components of the operator of current for the considered particles core, proton, muon x = (vc, Vp, r, t) includes the space coordinates of the three particles plus time (equal for all particles) and y is the adiabatic parameter. For the photon propagator, it is possible to use the exact electrodynamical expression. Below we are limited by the lowest order of QED PT, i.e., the next QED corrections to Im E will not be considered. After some algebraic manipulation we arrive at the following expression for the imaginary part of the excited state energy as a sum of contributions ... 

Sampling across time and space, and substituting traveling wave components, one can show in a few lines of algebra that the sampled wave energy density is given by... 

In order to bridge the gap between the discretized micro- and macro-worlds, averaging of the variables is necessary. Macroscopic variables in the N-S equation, are the density p and the momentum I, which are functions of the lattice space vector r and time t. The local density p is the summation of the average number of particles travelling along each of six (hexagonal) directions, with velocity c. Multiplication of the density p by the velocity vector u equals linear momentum (I = pu). Boolean algebra is applied for the expressions of the discretized variables density and momentum, respectively, as follows ... 

---