Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solution systems model solute

Miller CW, Benson LV (1983) Simulation of solute transport in a chemically reactive heterogeneous system model development and application. Water Resourc Res 19 381-391 Moise X, Starinsky A, Katz A, Kolodny Y (2000) Ra isotopes and Rn in brines and ground waters of the Jordan-Dead Sea Rift Valley enrichment, retardation, and mixing. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64 2371-2388... [Pg.359]

Without a solution, formulated mathematical systems (models) are of little value. Four solution procedures are mainly followed the analytical, the numerical (e.g., finite different, finite element), the statistical, and the iterative. Numerical techniques have been standard practice in soil quality modeling. Analytical techniques are usually employed for simplified and idealized situations. Statistical techniques have academic respect, and iterative solutions are developed for specialized cases. Both the simulation and the analytic models can employ numerical solution procedures for their equations. Although the above terminology is not standard in the literature, it has been used here as a means of outlining some of the concepts of modeling. [Pg.50]

The obvious advantage is that the steady-state solution of an S-system model is accessible analytically. However, while the drastic reduction of complexity can be formally justified by a (logarithmic) expansion of the rate equation, it forsakes the interpretability of the involved parameters. The utilization of basic biochemical interrelations, such as an interpretation of fluxes in terms of a nullspace matrix is no longer possible. Rather, an incorporation of flux-balance constraints would result in complicated and unintuitive dependencies among the kinetic parameters. Furthermore, it must be emphasized that an S-system model does not necessarily result in a reduced number of reactions. Quite on the contrary, the number of reactions r = 2m usually exceeds the value found in typical metabolic networks. [Pg.183]

Because the mapping approach treats electronic and nuclear dynamics on the same dynamical footing, its classical limit can be employed to study the phase-space properties of a nonadiabatic system. With this end in mind, we adopt a onemode two-state spin-boson system (Model IVa), which is mapped on a classical system with two degrees of freedom (DoF). Studying various Poincare surfaces of section, a detailed phase-space analysis of the problem is given, showing that the model exhibits mixed classical dynamics [123]. Furthermore, a number of periodic orbits (i.e., solutions of the classical equation of motion that return to their initial conditions) of the nonadiabatic system are identified and discussed [125]. It is shown that these vibronic periodic orbits can be used to analyze the nonadiabatic quantum dynamics [126]. Finally, a three-mode model of nonadiabatic photoisomerization (Model III) is employed to demonstrate the applicability of the concept of vibronic periodic orbits to multidimensional dynamics [127]. [Pg.326]

Model Disposal System. The specific disposal systems modeled use lined pits as described by others (1-3). The lining is usually rubber or concrete, and is used to prevent pesticide solution from leaching to the surrounding area. Because of the impervious liner, the only transport route for parent pesticide is volatilization, providing the liner remains intact. The simplicity of these systems allowed the use of a crystallizing dish as a model disposal pit. The dish (50 x 100 mm inside depth, 0.044 m inside diameter, 0.095 m capacity, 310 ml) was filled to the brim with water or soil containing the desired amount of pesticide. [Pg.280]

The subject matter covered below is divided into sections according to the structure of the redox unit(s). This review is restricted primarily to materials for which well-defined redox behavior has been repiorted, usually involving cyclic voltammetric studies and other electrochemical techniques in solution. Unraveling the electron transfer processes in laiger macromolecules which contain multiple redox sites can be very challenging, thus for some systems model branched oligomers have been studied in detail, and this work will be discussed. Selected synthetic schemes are included to acquaint the reader with the building blocks which are available for the construction of new derivatives, and with the synthetic steps involved. [Pg.117]

Typically, a non-linear system dynamic model is made up of individual lumped models of the components which at a minimum conserve mass and energy across the given component, but may also have a momentum equation if pressure drops must also be analyzed. For most dynamic problems of interest in hybrid studies, however, the momentum equation may be taken as quasi-steady (unless the solver requires the dynamic form to perform the numerical solution). Higher fidelity individual models or reduced order models (ROMs) can also be used, where the connection to the system model would be made at each subcomponent boundary. Since dynamic systems modeling is not as common as steady-state modeling, some discussion of modeling approaches will be given. There are two primary methods used to provide solutions for the pressure-flow dynamics of a system model. [Pg.251]

The use of the compressibility term can be described as follows. The greater the stiffness a system model has, the more quickly the flow reacts to a change in pressure, and vice versa. For instance, if all fluids in the system are incompressible, and quasi-steady assumptions are used, then a step change to a valve should result in an instantaneous equilibrium of flows and pressures throughout the entire system. This makes for a stiff numerical solution, and is thus computationally intense. This pressure-flow solution technique allows for some compressibility to relax the problem. The equilibrium time of a quasi-steady model can be modified by changing this parameter, for instance this term could be set such that equilibrium occurs after 2 to 3 seconds for the entire model. However, quantitative results less than this timescale would then potentially not be captured accurately. As a final note, this technique can also incorporate flow elements that use the momentum equation (non-quasi-steady), but its strength is more suited by quasi-steady flow assumptions. [Pg.253]

The solubility of TB 1 in supercritic carbon dioxide over the pressure range from 8 to 19 MPa and from 308 to 328 K has been measured using a flow system. Models based on chemical association, which did not require the critical parameters of the solute, were used to correlate the experimental data (00JCED464). Addition of methanol dramatically enhances the solubility (00MI823). [Pg.41]

Some chemical process systems may have a single steady state (single solution to a process model) under some design or operation conditions and multiple solutions under other design conditions. There are automatic techniques to vary a parameter of a system model to determine when these solutions branch from a single solution to multiple solutions. The FORTRAN code AUTO is perhaps the most widely used code for this. [Pg.132]

Reagent mixing can be enhanced by narrowing the passages between the electrodes or by placing obstructions into these streams to induce turbulence in the fluid flows. The downside of these solutions is that they increase pressure drop. In addition, if the dimensional tolerances cannot be accurately maintained or if the system model is not accurate, such obstructions can potentially interfere with the gas distribution between cells. [Pg.263]

Stefan Balint, Analysis and Numerical Computation of Solutions of Nonlinear Systems Modeling Physical Phenomena, Especially Nonlinear Optics, Inverse Problems, Mathematical Materials Science and Theoretical Fluid Mechanics, Proceedings of a conference held 19-21 May 1997, in Timisoara, Romania, University of the West Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania, 1997. [Pg.285]

Figure 7. Partial pressure of 02 for a solution that originally contained 5mF Mn(II), 0.1F NaGH and 0.3F NaOH and was oxygenated for 20 min with Oz at 1 atm before degassing with argon. pH lowered by addition of concentrated HCIOj to a sealed cell. Partial pressures of 02 measured with a Beckman membrane electrode system (model 1008). Figure 7. Partial pressure of 02 for a solution that originally contained 5mF Mn(II), 0.1F NaGH and 0.3F NaOH and was oxygenated for 20 min with Oz at 1 atm before degassing with argon. pH lowered by addition of concentrated HCIOj to a sealed cell. Partial pressures of 02 measured with a Beckman membrane electrode system (model 1008).

See other pages where Solution systems model solute is mentioned: [Pg.474]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.4730]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.131]   


SEARCH



Automata Models of Aqueous Solution Systems

Confined model systems solutions

Linear Isotherm Systems—Solution to the General Model

Model solutions

Models solution systems model

Numerical Solution of the Model System

Regular solution model for a two sub-lattice system

Solutal model

Solute model

Solution systems

Solution systems model

Solution systems model

Solution systems model aqueous solutions modeling

Solution systems model dissolution application

Solution systems model hydrophobic effect

Solution systems model probability

Solution systems model rules

Solution systems model structure

© 2024 chempedia.info