Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solute-surfactant interactions

It is of particular interest to be able to correlate solubility and partitioning with the molecular stmcture of the surfactant and solute. Likes dissolve like is a well-wom plirase that appears applicable, as we see in microemulsion fonnation where reverse micelles solubilize water and nonnal micelles solubilize hydrocarbons. Surfactant interactions, geometrical factors and solute loading produce limitations, however. There appear to be no universal models for solubilization that are readily available and that rest on molecular stmcture. Correlations of homologous solutes in various micellar solutions have been reviewed by Nagarajan [52]. Some examples of solubilization, such as for polycyclic aromatics in dodecyl sulphonate micelles, are driven by hydrophobic... [Pg.2592]

Figure C2.17.2. Transmission electron micrograph of a gold nanoneedle. Inverse micelle environments allow for a great deal of control not only over particle size, but also particle shape. In this example, gold nanocrystals were prepared using a photolytic method in surfactant-rich solutions the surfactant interacts strongly with areas of low curvature, thus continued growth can occur only at the sharjD tips of nanocrystals, leading to the fonnation of high-aspect-ratio nanostmctures [52]. Figure C2.17.2. Transmission electron micrograph of a gold nanoneedle. Inverse micelle environments allow for a great deal of control not only over particle size, but also particle shape. In this example, gold nanocrystals were prepared using a photolytic method in surfactant-rich solutions the surfactant interacts strongly with areas of low curvature, thus continued growth can occur only at the sharjD tips of nanocrystals, leading to the fonnation of high-aspect-ratio nanostmctures [52].
FORMATION. Aqueous solutions of highly surface-active substances spontaneously tend to reduce interfacial energy of solute-solvent interactions by forming micelles. The critical micelle concentration (or, c.m.c.) is the threshold surfactant concentration, above which micelle formation (also known as micellization) is highly favorable. For sodium dodecyl sulfate, the c.m.c. is 5.6 mM at 0.01 M NaCl or about 3.1 mM at 0.03 M NaCl. The lower c.m.c. observed at higher salt concentration results from a reduction in repulsive forces among the ionic head groups on the surface of micelles made up of ionic surfactants. As would be expected for any entropy-driven process, micelle formation is less favorable as the temperature is lowered. [Pg.464]

This brief review has attempted to discuss some of the important phenomena in which surfactant mixtures can be involved. Mechanistic aspects of surfactant interactions and some mathematical models to describe the processes have been outlined. The application of these principles to practical problems has been considered. For example, enhancement of solubilization or surface tension depression using mixtures has been discussed. However, in many cases, the various processes in which surfactants interact generally cannot be considered by themselves, because they occur simultaneously. The surfactant technologist can use this to advantage to accomplish certain objectives. For example, the enhancement of mixed micelle formation can lead to a reduced tendency for surfactant precipitation, reduced adsorption, and a reduced tendency for coacervate formation. The solution to a particular practical problem involving surfactants is rarely obvious because often the surfactants are involved in multiple steps in a process and optimization of a number of simultaneous properties may be involved. An example of this is detergency, where adsorption, solubilization, foaming, emulsion formation, and other phenomena are all important. In enhanced oil recovery. [Pg.24]

Where this factor plays a role, the hydrophobic interaction between the hydrocarbon chains of the surfactant and the non-polar parts of protein functional groups are predominant. An example of this effect is the marked endothermic character of the interactions between the anionic CITREM and sodium caseinate at pH = 7.2 (Semenova et al., 2006), and also between sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and soy protein at pH values of 7.0 and 8.2 (Nakai et al., 1980). It is important here to note that, when the character of the protein-surfactant interactions is endothermic (/.< ., involving a positive contribution from the enthalpy to the change in the overall free energy of the system), the main thermodynamic driving force is considered to be an increase in the entropy of the system due to release into bulk solution of a great number of water molecules. This entropy... [Pg.178]

The basis for separation employing micellar mobile phases stems from their ability to differentially solubilize and bind structurally similar solutes. Skeptics view MLC as a fascinating example of the incorporation of secondary equilibria for control or adjustment of retention (101). However, it is the ultimate of secondary equilibria since the types of interactions possible with micellar aggregates cannot be duplicated by any single other equilibrium system, or for that matter, any one or mixture of traditional normal or reversed phase mobile phase systems. This is due to the fact that solutes can interact with the surfactant aggregates via hydrophobic, electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and/or a combination of these factors. [Pg.21]

Proteins solubilized in aqueous solution interact more or less with hydrophilic groups of surfactants at the oil-water interface. Therefore, the type of hydrophilic group is strongly influenced by the protein extraction efficiency. Anionic and cationic surfactants interact with charged protein surfaces more strongly than non-ionic surfactants. This feature also means that the non-ionic surfactants are favourable for protein stabilization in water droplets because of the not-so-hard interaction between the protein and the surfactant. In protein extraction, such an electrostatic interaction between proteins and surfactants is the main driving force in protein transfer. [Pg.288]

The agreement between the mixture adsorption data and ideal solution theory is excellent. It is important to remember that while looking at various constant leyels of adsorption in Region II, we are looking at the CAC of the mixed admicelle that has just formed on a particular patch. By looking at different adsorption levels, we are looking at how the two surfactants interact on different energy level patches on the surface. [Pg.215]

The discussion so far has been limited to polymer-surfactant Interactions in the bulk solution. In the section to follow, interactions at the air-liquid Interface are examined. [Pg.303]

This book on polymeric microemulsions is an attempt at a rapprochement of the methods and structures encountered in the two disciplines. The purpose of this book is to investigate polymer-polymer or polymer-surfactant interactions in solution leading to association structures with properties such as solubilization and anisotropy. These properties are useful in a wide variety of industries such as pharmaceutics, cosmetics, textiles, detergents, and paints. [Pg.370]

Model calculations of interface-solute electrostatic interactions reproduce well the view of microenvironment polarities of micelles and bilayers obtained from experimental data [57]. According to molecular dynamics simulations, at 1.2 nm from a bilayer interface, water has the properties of bulk water. At shorter distances, water movement slows as individual water molecules become attracted to the interface. At the true interface, which is a region containing both H2O molecules and the surfactant polar head groups, the water molecules are oriented with... [Pg.2964]


See other pages where Solute-surfactant interactions is mentioned: [Pg.295]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.1635]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.2578]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.809]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.17 , Pg.18 ]




SEARCH



Interaction surfactant

Surfactant solutions

© 2024 chempedia.info