Solute Hamiltonian operator

The key to current continuum algorithms for calculating the properties of a molecule in solution is to formulate a solution Hamiltonian operator H (Section 4.3.4) in which these energy terms appear in addition to the in vacuo... 

The solute-solvent interactions are accounted for by a perturbation added to the solute Hamiltonian operator ... 

Hamiltonian operator, 2,4 for many-electron systems, 27 for many valence electron molecules, 8 semi-empirical parametrization of, 18-22 for Sn2 reactions, 61-62 for solution reactions, 57, 83-86 for transition states, 92 Hammond, and linear free energy relationships, 95... 

Perturbation theory provides a procedure for finding approximate solutions to the Schrodinger equation for a system which differs only slightly from a system for which the solutions are known. The Hamiltonian operator H for the system of interest is given by... 

Because of the interelectronic repulsion term l/ri2, the electronic Hamiltonian is not separable and only approximate solution of the wave equation can be considered. The obvious strategy would be to use Hj wave functions in a variation analysis. Unfortunately, these are not known in functional form and are available only as tables. A successful parameterization, first proposed by James and Coolidge [89] and still the most successful procedure, consists of expressing the Hamiltonian operator in terms of the four elliptical coordinates 1j2 and 771 >2 of the two electrons and the variable p = 2ri2/rab. The elliptical coordinates 4> 1 and 2, as in the case of Hj, do not enter into the ground-state wave function. The starting wave function for the lowest state was therefore taken in the power-series form... 

The actual form of the Hamiltonian operator hp does not have to be defined at this moment. As in standard perturbation theory, it is assumed that the solution of the electronic structure problem of the combined Hamiltonian HKS +HP can be described as the solution y/(0) of HKS, corrected by a small additional linear-response wavefunction /b//(,). Only these response orbitals will explicitly depend on time - they will follow the oscillations of the external perturbation and adopt its time dependency. Thus, the following Ansatz is made for the solution of the perturbed Hamiltonian HKS +HP ... 

Here is the Hartree-Fock wave function of the solute immersed in the solution, and the four energy terms of equation (55) come directly from the corresponding Hamiltonian operators of equations (53) and (54). 

The perturbation method is a unique method to determine the correlation energy of the system. Here the Hamiltonian operator consists of two parts, //0 and H, where //0 is the unperturbed Hamiltonian and // is the perturbation term. The perturbation method always gives corrections to the solutions to various orders. The Hamiltonian for the perturbed system is... 

The solution of the unperturbed Hamiltonian operator forms a complete orthonormal set. The perturbed Schrodinger equation is given by... 

These are the solutions fj of the time-independent Schrddinger equation Ht , = E/Y , where H is the Hamiltonian operator of the system and , is the energy corresponding to the state y,-. 

So far we have assumed that the electronic structure of the crystal consists of one band derived, in our approximation, from a single atomic state. In general, this will not be a realistic picture. The metals, for example, have a complicated system of overlapping bands derived, in our approximation, from several atomic states. This means that more than one atomic orbital has to be associated with each crystal atom. When this is done, it turns out that even the equations for the one-dimensional crystal cannot be solved directly. However, the mathematical technique developed by Baldock (2) and Koster and Slater (S) can be applied (8) and a formal solution obtained. Even so, the question of the existence of otherwise of surface states in real crystals is diflBcult to answer from theoretical considerations. For the simplest metals, i.e., the alkali metals, for which a one-band model is a fair approximation, the problem is still difficult. The nature of the difficulty can be seen within the framework of our simple model. In the first place, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian operator is really different for each electron. If we overlook this complication and use some sort of mean value for this operator, the operator still contains terms representing the interaction of the considered electron with all other electrons in the crystal. The Coulomb part of this interaction acts in such a way as to reduce the effect of the perturbation introduced by the existence of a free surface. A self-consistent calculation is therefore essential, and the various parameters in our theory would have to be chosen in conformity with the results of such a calculation. 

After the energy is expressed as a functional of the 2-RDM, a systematic hierarchy of V-representabihty constraints, known as p-positivity conditions, is derived [17]. We develop the details of the 2-positivity, 3-positivity, and partial 3-positivity conditions [21, 27, 34, 33]. In Section II.E the formal solution of V-representability for the 2-RDM is presented through a convex set of two-particle reduced Hamiltonian matrices [7, 21]. It is shown that the positivity conditions correspond to certain classes of reduced Hamiltonian matrices, and consequently, they are exact for certain classes of Hamiltonian operators at any interaction strength. In Section II.F the size of the 2-RDM is reduced through the use of spin and spatial symmetries [32, 34], and in Section II.G the variational 2-RDM method is extended to open-shell molecules [35]. 

The formal solution of Al-representability for the 2-RDM is developed in terms of a convex set of two-particle reduced Hamiltonian matrices. To complement the derivation of the positivity conditions from the metric matrices, we derive them from classes of these two-particle reduced Hamiltonian matrices. This interpretation allows us to demonstrate that the 2-positivity conditions are exact for certain classes of Hamiltonian operators for any interaction strength. In this section all of the ROMs are normalized to unity. Much of this discussion appeared originally in Refs. [21, 29]. 

One simple form of the Schrodinger equation—more precisely, the time-independent, nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation—you may be familiar with is Hx i = ty. This equation is in a nice form for putting on a T-shirt or a coffee mug, but to understand it better we need to define the quantities that appear in it. In this equation, H is the Hamiltonian operator and v i is a set of solutions, or eigenstates, of the Hamiltonian. Each of these solutions,... 

Another way that additional configurations can be added to the the ground-state wave function is by the use of Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MPPT). As it happens, a Hamiltonian operator constructed from a sum of Fock operators has as its set of solutions the HF single determinantal wave function and all other determinantal wave... 

In equation (A.8), is the wave function which describes the distribution of particles in the system. It may be the exact wave function [the solution to equation (A.l)] or a reasonable approximate wave function. For most molecules, the ground electronic state wave function is real, and in writing the expectation value in the form of equation (A.8), we have made this simplifying (though not necessary) assumption. The electronic energy is an observable of the system, and the corresponding operator is the Hamiltonian operator. Therefore, one may obtain an estimate for the energy even if one does not know the exact wave function but only an approximate one, P, that is,... 

In this chapter we introduce the SchrSdinger equation this equation is fundamental to all applications of quantum mechanics to chemical problems. For molecules of chemical interest it is an equation which is exceedingly difficult to solve and any possible simplifications due to the symmetry of the system concerned are very welcome. We are able to introduce symmetry, and thereby the results of the previous chapters, by proving one single but immensely valuable fact the transformation operators Om commute with the Hamiltonian operator, Jf. It is by this subtle thread that we can then deduce some of the properties of the solutions of the Schrodinger equation without even solving it. 

In the second place, the Hamiltonian operators which occur and commute with all Or belong to the totally symmetric irreducible representation T1 (see Appendix A. 10-3) and integrals over them dT vanish unless T = T (see eqn (8-4.5)). Thus, in carrying out an approximate solution of the electronic Schrodinger equation, changing to a set of basis functions which belong to the irreducible representations will allow us, by inspection, to put many of the integrals which occur equal to zero. There will also, because of this, be an... 

---