Hamiltonian combined

For k-vectors away from the centre of the BZ, the whole EM Hamiltonian combines with the Bloch functions of the r + and p7+ VB states, and this breaks the parabolicity of the T7+ VB. Normally, for a parabolic band, the energy levels are independent from i and given by En (a.u.) = 1/n2. When non-parabolicity is taken into account, it has been shown by [14] that the modification of the energy levels from band mixing leads to a perturbation term yielding ... 

Gagliardi and Roos conducted a series of studies on actinide compounds. They follow a combined approach with DKH/AMFI Hamiltonians combined with CASSCF/CASPT2 for the energy calculation and an a posteriori added spin-orbit perturbation expanded in the space of nonrelativistic CSFs. This strategy aims to establish a balance of sufficiently accurate wave function and Hamiltonian approximations. Since the CASSCF wave function provides chemically reasonable but not highly accurate results (as witnessed, for instance, in the preceding section), it is combined with a quasi-relativistic Hamiltonian, namely the sc alar-relativistic DKH one-electron Hamiltonian. Additional effects — dynamic correlation and spin-orbit coupling — are then considered via perturbation theory. 

In this chapter we will provide a critical review of the use of 2- and 4-component relativistic Hamiltonians combined with all-electron methods and appropriate basis sets for the study of lanthanide and actinide chemistry. These approaches provide in principle the more rigorous treatment of the electronic structure but typically demand large computational resources due to the large basis sets that are required for accurate energetics. A complication is furthermore the open-shell nature of many systems of practical interest that make black box application of conventional methods impossible. Especially for calculations in which electron correlation is explicitly considered one needs to find a balance between the appropriate treatment of the multi-reference nature of the wave function and the practical limitations encountered in the choice of an active space. For density functional theory (DFT) calculations one needs to select the appropriate density functional approximation (DFA) on basis of assessments for lighter elements because little or no high-precision experimental information on isolated molecules is available for the f elements. This increases the demand for reliable theoretical ( benchmark ) data in which all possible errors due to the inevitable approximations are carefully checked. In order to do so we need to understand how f elements differ from the more commonly encountered main group elements and also from the d elements with which they of course share some characteristics. 

The symmetry argument actually goes beyond the above deterniination of the symmetries of Jahn-Teller active modes, the coefficients of the matrix element expansions in different coordinates are also symmetry determined. Consider, for simplicity, an electronic state of symmetiy in an even-electron molecule with a single threefold axis of symmetry, and choose a representation in which two complex electronic components, e ) = 1/v ( ca) i cb)), and two degenerate complex nuclear coordinate combinations Q = re " each have character T under the C3 operation, where x — The bras e have character x. Since the Hamiltonian operator is totally symmetric, the diagonal matrix elements e H e ) are totally symmetric, while the characters of the off-diagonal elements ezf H e ) are x. Since x = 1, it follows that an expansion of the complex Hamiltonian matrix to quadratic terms in Q. takes the form... 

One starts with the Hamiltonian for a molecule H r, R) written out in terms of the electronic coordinates (r) and the nuclear displacement coordinates (R, this being a vector whose dimensionality is three times the number of nuclei) and containing the interaction potential V(r, R). Then, following the BO scheme, one can write the combined wave function [ (r, R) as a sum of an infinite number of terms... 

MMVB is a hybrid force field, which uses MM to treat the unreactive molecular framework, combined with a valence bond (VB) approach to treat the reactive part. The MM part uses the MM2 force field [58], which is well adapted for organic molecules. The VB part uses a parametrized Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian, which can be illustrated by considering a two orbital, two electron description of a sigma bond described by the VB determinants... 

The first theoretical handling of the weak R-T combined with the spin-orbit coupling was carried out by Pople [71]. It represents a generalization of the perturbative approaches by Renner and PL-H. The basis functions are assumed as products of (42) with the eigenfunctions of the spin operator conesponding to values E = 1/2. The spin-orbit contribution to the model Hamiltonian was taken in the phenomenological form (16). It was assumed that both interactions are small compared to the bending vibrational frequency and that both the... 

Note that only the polynomial factors have been given, since the exponential parts are identical for all wave functions. Of course, any linear combination of the wave functions in Eqs. (D.5)-(D.7) will still be an eigenfunction of the vibrational Hamiltonian, and hence a possible state. There are three such linearly independent combinations which assume special importance, namely,... 

The relationship between the initial, final and intermediate states is usefully describer terms of a coupling parameter, A. As A is changed from 0 to 1, the Hamiltonian varies fi Isfx to Y- Each of the terms in the force field for an intermediate state A can be wri as a linear combination of the values for X and Y ... 

The formal structure of (5.77) suggests that the reaction coordinate Q can be combined with the bath coordinates to form a new fictitious bath , so that the Hamiltonian takes the standard form of dissipative TLS (5.55). Suppose that the original spectrum of the bath is ohmic, with friction coefficient q. Then diagonalization of the total system (Q, qj ) gives the new effective spectral density [Garg et al. 1985]... 

Freezing transitions have been examined in recent years by density functional methods [306-313]. Here we review the results [298] of a modification of the Ramakrishnan-Yussouff theory to the model fluid with Hamiltonian (Eq. (25)) a related study of phase transitions in a system of hard discs in two dimensions with Ising internal states which couple anti-ferromagnetically to their neighbors is shown in Ref. 304. First, a combined... 

The next step might be to perform a configuration interaction calculation, in order to get a more accurate representation of the excited states. We touched on this for dihydrogen in an earlier chapter. To do this, we take linear combinations of the 10 states given above, and solve a 10 x 10 matrix eigenvalue problem to find the expansion coefficients. The diagonal elements of the Hamiltonian matrix are given above (equation 8.7), and it turns out that there is a simplification. 

In my discussion of pyridine, I took a combination of these determinants that had the correct singlet spin symmetry (that is, the combination that represented a singlet state). I could equally well have concentrated on the triplet states. In modem Cl calculations, we simply use all the raw Slater determinants. Such single determinants by themselves are not necessarily spin eigenfunctions, but provided we include them all we will get correct spin eigenfunctions on diago-nalization of the Hamiltonian matrix. 

The phrase symmetry adapted basis functions refers to those linear combinations of basis functions (on several atoms) that transform like the particular irreducible representation of the appropriate point group. Molecular symmetry is used at various points in these calculations twenty years ago I would have had to write several chapters on molecular symmetry, point groups, constructing symmetry-adapted combinations of basis functions, factoring a Hamiltonian matrix using symmetry and related topics. The point is that twenty... 

For the calculation of the LDA ground-state one can proceed either via the direct" methods, i.e. via the glocal minimization of the total free energy with respect to the electronic degrees of freedom, or via the the diagonalization (for large PW basis-sets necessarily iterative diagonalization) of the KS Hamiltonian in combination with an iterative update of chai ge-density and potential. 

On the basis of the optimized ground-slate geometries, we simulate the absorption speetra by combining the scmicmpirical Hartree-Fock Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap (INDO) Hamiltonian to a Single Configuration Interaction... 

---