Solid dispersions supercritical fluid process

Woo JS, Kim HJ, Kim Y (2006) Method for the preparatin of paclitaxel sohd dispersion by using the supercritical fluid process and paclitaxel solid dispersion prepared thereby, Google Patents Yeo S-D, Kiran E (2005) Formation of polymer particles with supercritical fluids a review. J Supercrit Fluids 34(3) 287-308... 

Numerous processes for powder generation using supercritical fluids have been developed. The specific properties of dense gases allow obtaining fine dispersed solids, especially of substances with low melting point temperatures, high viscosities and very waxy or sticky properties. Economic evaluation of the process shows that these compounds cannot be efficiently and economically processed by conventioned mechanical processes and there is a big advantage of the use of supercritical fluids. 

The seventh trend is the increasing use of novel processing methods. For example, there is growing use of supercritical fluids (e.g., supercritical carbon dioxide and nitrogen gases) to foam polyolefin blends for density reduction. There is use of ultrasound to, for example, devulcanize cross-linked rubber. There is use of solid-state shear mechanical processing to break the polyolefin blend material into submicron particles to make environment friendly (water-based) polyolefin dispersions. There is use of electrospinning technique to make polyolefin fibers and in particular nanofibers. 

Supercritical anti-solvent micronization can be performed using different processing methods and equipment [17]. Different acronyms were used by the various authors to indicate the micronization process. It has been referred to as GAS (gas anti-solvent), PCA (precipitation by compressed anti-solvent), ASES (aerosol solvent extraction system), SEDS (solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids), and SAS (supercritical anti-solvent) process [8,17]. Since the resulting solid material can be signiflcantly influenced by the adopted process arrangement, a short description of the various methods is presented below. 

For many years, the traditional sample preparation methods, such as the Soxhlet extraction, were applied. Most of these methods have been used for more than 100 years, and they mostly require large amounts of organic solvents. These methods were tested during those times, and the analysts were familiar with the processes and protocols required. However, the trends in recent years are automation, short extraction times, and reduced organic solvent consumption. Modern approaches in solid sample preparation include microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE), pressurized liquid extraction, accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), automated Soxhlet extraction, supercritical fluid extraction (SEE), gas-phase extraction, etc. 

In this context, studies about the development of relevant analytical methods allowing the detection of pesticide residues in VOO are usually focused on an optimization of the various steps of the analysis process, namely extraction, clean-up, identification, and quantitation of pesticide content. The common extraction methods are Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SEE), and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). Cleanup methods include SPE, matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). 

The production of solid emulsion powders was successfully carried out. Powders consisting of tristearin and water concentrations of up to 35 wt% were produced without using an emulsifier with particles sizes in the range of 10 pm were produced. It was observed that the supercritical fluid can act as an emulsifier to lower the interfacial tension between the dispersed and continuous phase. A visual investigation of the emulsion quality showed improvement of the latter with increasing turbulence in the static mixer. It was observed however that the structure of the produced emulsion will be most probably affected by the nozzle flow. Ongoing experiments where a variation of the saturation pressure, nozzle diameter, and viscosity ratio should help link the droplet sizes to dimensionless numbers and determine the optimal parameters for the encapsulation process. 

The nanofiUers gain increasing acceptance and utility. Novel processing methods are developed that allow to improve dispersion and exfoliation of clays, such as the use of supercritical fluids, ultrasound, and solid-state shear processing [2]. Another important trend in... 

Nanocapsules act like a reservoir, which are called vesicular systems. They carry the active substance entrapped in the solid polymeric membrane or on their surfaces. The cavily inside contains either oil or water. A schematic diagram of Polymer Nanocapsules is shown in Fig. 9.2 [5], There are different methods that are used nowadays to prepare polymeric nanoparticles, such as nanoprecipitation (also termed as the solvent diffusion and solvent displacement method), solvent evaporation, dialysis, microemulsion, surfactant-free emulsion, salling-out, supercritical fluid technology, and interfacial polymerization [2]. Among these methods, nanoprecipitation is a fast and simple process, which does not require a pre-prepared polymer emulsion before the nanoparticle preparation. It produces a dispersion of nanoparticles by precipitation of preformed hydrophobic polymer solution. Under... 

Gas anti-solvent processes (GASR, gas anti-solvent recrystallization GASP, gas antisolvent precipitation SAS, supercritical anti-solvent fractionation PCA, precipitation with a compressed fluid anti-solvent SEDS, solution-enhanced dispersion of solids) differ in the way the contact between solution and anti-solvent is achieved. This may be by spraying the solution in a supercritical gas, spraying the gas into the liquid solution. 

---