Social Democratic Party

Luxemburg differed most sharply with Lenin in her relative faith in the autonomous creativity of the working class. Her optimism in Mass-Strike, Party, and Trade Unions" is partly due to the fact that it was written, unlike What Is to Be Done after the object lesson of worker militancy provided by the 1905 revolution. Luxemburg was especially struck by the massive response of the Warsaw proletariat to the revolution of 1905. On the other hand, Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy was written before the events of 1905 and in direct reply to What Is to Be Done This essay was a key text in the refusal of the Polish party to place itself under the central discipline of the Russian Social Democratic Party. 

Seeking to rationalize the ensuing patchwork of regulations, both the governing Christian-Democratic Union (CDU) and opposition Social-Democratic Party (SPD) proposed federal drug laws in 1958.62 A parliamentary advisory... 

On November 9, 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm II abandoned his throne and went into exile. Friedrich Ebert, the leader of the Social Democratic Party, proclaimed the end of imperial Germany and the start of a new republic. On November 11, all sides signed an armistice, and the guns went quiet. A shell-shocked continent paused to consider its losses. 

In the autumn of 1987, the Liberal Government approached the Social-Democratic Party to agree on changes in the labour market policies including the abolition of the benefit cuts for the very long-term unemployed introduced in 1985. 

As part of this agreement between the Government and the Social Democrats, the unemployed persons right to activation including education/training was improved. The LO (The Danish Federation of Trade Unions) had a direct influence on the design of the law through their close relationship with the Social Democratic Party while the DA (The Danish Employers Confederation) did not seem to be officially involved. 

From 1901 to 1924 and from 1926 to 1929 the governments were liberal and with strong bonds to agriculture. The first social democratic government was in office from 1924 to 1926, and from 1929 to 1940 the government was formed by a coalition between the social democratic party and a smaller liberal party ( the radicals ). 

Maier (1889-1966). He was immediately dismissed from the civil service and arrested in 1933. In 1934, he was able to emigrate to the USA, where he became economics professor at the New School for Social Research in New York (cf. [19], pp. 396-397). As is generally known, the Communist and Social Democratic Parties were branded as subversive right from the start and their members were persecuted systematically. On the basis of what was known as the Reichstag fire regulation of 28 February 1933, the 81 parliamentary seats held by the Communist Party were revoked on 8 March and the assets of the party were confiscated on 26 May. With reference to the Social Democratic Party, the Reich Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick (1877-1946), called on the state governments to ban the party s activities on 22 June ... 

The adverse political influence started in Germany as early as the late seventies, when the usefulness and the safety standards of nuclear power in general and SNR-300 in particular were questioned more and more by the Social Democratic Party, the initiator and until then strong supporter of this research project. 

The Social Democratic Party, which was in power in the state in which SNR-300 was... 

Naturally, such follies have a political background. At the level of the Swedish Parliament, the green block, consisting of the Environmental Party and the likewise environmentalist Center Party, exerts a substantial political influence. The Swedish Greens control a sufficient number of members of parliament that they can swing votes in favor either of the Social Democrats or the liberal/conservatives, endowing the Greens with clout out of all proportion to their numbers. 

As an anecdotal illustration, due to Francis Seiersted. I nuy cite the fact that the Nor-we n Conservative Party fn 1961 understandably had little success when in oppoi itwi they adopted the slogan that the British Conservatives and later the Danish Social Democrats successfully used in pouvr "Makegood times better."... 

On March 23, German democracy completed its capitulation. The parliament handed Hitler s government absolute power. Even the party that Fritz Haber had supported, the liberal Deutsche Stuatspartd, voted for the measure. Only the Social Democrats voted against it. Communist members of the Reichstag were prevented from voting because of unspecified security concerns. 

This sequence of rather harsh reforms that were perceived as a break with the traditional social policy approach to labour market problems provoked broad public unrest, which eventually resulted in a significant decline in political support for the Red-Green coalition, in particular the Social Democrats, the emergence of a new left-wing party and the electoral defeat of Red-Green in autumn 2005 (Eichhorst and Sesselmeier 2006)2. 

The Reich Ministry of Justice announced in this context Officials who used to be members of these parties must be required to submit a written statement that they no longer maintain a relationship of any kind to the two parties (Social Democratic and Communist Parties, editor s note), their support and substitute organisations and their representatives abroad. Their attention must be brought to the fact that dismissal is the punishment for the provision of false information (quoted from [16], p. 171). 

The question of the executive and judicial means by which the people can be guaranteed to be kept comprehensively and truthfully informed is bound to be a difficult one in view of the fundamental freedoms of press and speech. It would be necessary to require, for example, that the media be subject to democratic control in that the formation of political or economic monopolies would be prevented. One proposal would be to allow access to the media in their area of operations to political parties proportional to the vote they received or to socially-concerned organizations (such as religions) proportional to their membership, without a limiting minimum percent. 

---