Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Small reactor, comparison with experiments

The renaming noise and drifts on the Arrhenius plot are the fault of the very simple experimental equipment used. The noise is principally attributable to entrained air bubbles in the feed, which were visible entering the reactor during the experiment. The bubbles disturbed the measurement of conductivity tty passing over, or settling on, the conductivity electrodes. Even then, the resultant scatter in the Arrhenius plot is small in comparison with that encountered in the Arrhenius plots from standard isothermal reactors, as is evident from results reported in the literature by various authors. [Pg.254]

The reactor feed mixture was "prepared so as to contain less than 17% ethylene (remainder hydrogen) so that the change in total moles within the catalyst pore structure would be small. This reduced the variation in total pressure and its effect on the reaction rate, so as to permit comparison of experiment results with theoretical predictions [e.g., those of Weisz and Hicks (61)]. Since the numerical solutions to the nonisothermal catalyst problem also presumed first-order kinetics, they determined the Thiele modulus by forcing the observed rate to fit this form even though they recognized that a Hougen-Watson type rate expression would have been more appropriate. Hence their Thiele modulus was defined as... [Pg.462]

Pilavakis (20, 29) investigated the esterification of methanol by acetic acid in a packed column. He assumed the reaction to be pseudo-first-order with respect to either methanol or acid over certain specified concentration ranges and incorporated the effect of heat of reaction not only in the enthalpy balances but also in the flux equations. The column was calculated by numerical solution of a set of differential equations. The top product was an azeotropic mixture of methanol and ester which could, however, be broken by introduction of acetic acid high up in the column rather than further down as a mixed feed with methanol. Consequently, in practice such a column will consist of a rectifying section, an extractive distillation section with acetic acid as the extractive solvent and a distillation reactor section. Good agreement was obtained between theory and experiment which, however, suffered from the fact that the hold-up of liquid in the column was small in comparison to the reboiler hold-up so that most of the reaction occurred in the latter location. [Pg.395]

Most of the suppliers provided up-dated information on their technical designs, possibilities of reducing construction time and on economic comparison between nuclear and coal fired plants. Two developing countries presented papers on their SMPR market situation. Detailed information was presented about economic comparison of nuclear and coal-fired plants, based on experience in India and Canada, which clearly indicates the advantages of a nuclear power programme with small reactors. Other participants expressed doubts about the use of nuclear power versus other power sources, especially coal in the size range below 600 MW(e). [Pg.13]

The reports mentioned above provide a systematic coverage of the nonimmobi-lized enzymatic reactors used in biocatalytic reactions under continuous flow operation. Results from microreactor experiments were comparatively higher than conventionally mixed batch reactors in terms of conversion rate and improvement of product yield as demonstrated for hydrolysis [140], dehalogenation [141], oxidation [142], esteriflcation [143], synthesis of isoamyl acetate [144,145], synthesis of cyanohydrins [147,148], synthesis of chiral metabolites [153], reduction [151], and bioluminescent reaction [149]. The small volumes involved and the favorable mass transfer inherent to these devices make them particularly useful for the screening of biocatalysts and rapid characterization of bioconversion systems. The remarkable results of such studies revealed that the product yield could be enhanced significantly in comparison with the conventional batch runs. [Pg.356]

Experimental Validation. The following types of measurement have been used to evaluate the accuracy of Doppler effect calculations (a) the South-west Experimental Fast Oxide Reactor (SEFOR) was built and operated specifically to measure Doppler effects (or fast-acting fuel reactivity feedback effects with expansion effects minimised) (b) the dependence of reactivity on temperature in operating power reactors, such as PHENDC and SUPER-PHENDC (fi-om the non-linearity of the temperature coefficient, for example) (c) the ZEBRA 5 Doppler Loop experiments, in which a test zone was heated. Experiments were performed with and without sodium present (d) the temperature dependence of the reactivity worths of small samples oscillated at the centre of critical assemblies (e) the differences in reaction rates in samples irradiated at different temperatures and (f) temperature dependent thick sample transmission and self-indication measurements, which are usually analj ed together with the differential nuclear data to provide average resonance parameter data. The uncertainties in extrapolating fi-om these comparisons to the conditions in an operating power reactor must also be taken into account. [Pg.172]


See other pages where Small reactor, comparison with experiments is mentioned: [Pg.60]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.57]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.60 ]




SEARCH



Reactors comparison

Small experiments

© 2024 chempedia.info