Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sulfur size distribution

Thiophene (C4H4S) is representative of the organic sulfur compounds that are hydrogenated in the commercial hyditodesulfurization of petroleum naphtha. Estimate both the combined and effective diflfusivities for thiophene in hydrogen at 660 °K and 3.04 MPa in a catalyst with a BET surface area of 168 m2/g, a porosity of 0.40, and an apparent pellet density of 1.40 g/cm3. A narrow pore sized distribution... [Pg.525]

Hering, S. V., and S. K. Friedlander, Origins of Aerosol Sulfur Size Distributions in the Los Angeles Basin, Atmos. Environ 11 2647-2656 (1982). [Pg.399]

On the average, the requirements for application of the statistical technique to filter data were met. Analysis of the 254 measured particle size distributions in 1979 indicates that the fine aerosol volume distribution preserved its shape. The measured sulfur mass distribution followed that of the total submicron volume. By difference, it was assumed that the organics did the same. The low relative humidity at China Lake minimized the formation of aqueous solutions due to water condensation on the particles. Therefore, it is expected that the statistical technique can be used with some success with the China Lake filter data. [Pg.144]

It was found that the requirements were satisfied for application of the linear regression technique to species mass concentrations in a multicomponent aerosol. The results of 254 particle size distributions measured at China Lake in 1979 indicate that the normalized fine aerosol volume distribution remained approximately constant. The agreement between the calculated and measrued fine particle scattering coefficients was excellent. The measured aerosol sulfur mass distribution usually followed the total distribution for particles less than 1 ym. It was assumed that organic aerosol also followed the total submicron distribution. [Pg.152]

Sievering, H., J. Boatman, J. Galloway, W. Keene, Y. Kim, M. Luria, and J. Ray, Heterogeneous Sulfur Conversion in Sea-Salt Aerosol Particles The Role of Aerosol Water Content and Size Distribution, Atmos. Environ., 25A, 1479-1487 (1991). [Pg.346]

M. Loewenstein, G. V. Ferry, K. R. Chan, and B. L. Gary, Particle Size Distributions in Arctic Polar Stratospheric Clouds, Growth, and Freezing of Sulfuric Acid Droplets, and Implications for Cloud Formation, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 8015-8034 (1992). [Pg.712]

Novakov and Penner (1993) measured the mass size distributions of sulfur, organic carbon, and chlorine (characteristic of sea salt) as well as the CCN concentration (at 0.5% supersaturation), nss, and Aitken nuclei concentrations at a mountain peak in Puerto Rico. [Pg.810]

Another colloidal system with light scattering characteristics that have been widely studied is the so-called monodisperse sulfur sol. Although not actually monodisperse, the particle size distribution in this preparation is narrow enough to make it an ideal system for the study of optical phenomena. [Pg.235]

The cadmium red pigment intermediate is obtained as a precipitate which is filtered off, washed, and calcined at approx. 600 °C. As with cadmium yellow, calcination yields the red pigment and determines the particle size, particle size distribution, and color shade. Analogously to the cadmium yellow process, cadmium red can be produced by direct reaction of cadmium oxide or cadmium carbonate with sulfur and the required amount of selenium at approx. 600 °C. [Pg.108]

On-line measurements of the sulfur content of atmospheric aerosols have been made by removing gaseous sulfur species from the aerosol and then analyzing the particles for sulfur with a flame photometric detector (24) or by using an electrostatic precipitator to chop the aerosol particles from the gas so that the sulfur content could be measured by the difference in flame photometric detector response with and without particles present. These and similar methods could be extended to the analysis of size-classified samples to provide on-line size-resolved aerosol composition data, although the analytical methods would have to be extremely sensitive to achieve the size resolution possible in size distribution analysis. [Pg.205]

Figure 5. Sulfur size distribution in Glendora, California (east of Los Angeles), August 1986. The period of poor visibility during August 12 through 16 is best explained by the presence of sulfur mass in sizes above 0.34 xm in diameter. Surprisingly, fine mass and most of the other components changed little as the visibility improved. (Reproduced with permission from reference 24. Copyright... Figure 5. Sulfur size distribution in Glendora, California (east of Los Angeles), August 1986. The period of poor visibility during August 12 through 16 is best explained by the presence of sulfur mass in sizes above 0.34 xm in diameter. Surprisingly, fine mass and most of the other components changed little as the visibility improved. (Reproduced with permission from reference 24. Copyright...
A fourth example of data showing the particle distribution was a study that used the DRUM sampler at Grand Canyon National Park in 1984 (22). Recording the size distribution of sulfur was necessary in helping to understand the effects of sulfur on visibility degradation because there were two size modes one near 0.3 xm and one around 0.1 xm. These modes were not present simultaneously but appeared somewhat anticorrelated (see August 14 in Figure 7). [Pg.236]

Figure 7. Sulfur size distributions at Grand Canyon National Parky August 1984, The finest aerosols are at the top (stage 8, around 0.1 xm), and the coarsest (8.5 to about 15 xm) are at the bottom. Most sulfur mass occurs between 0.34 and 0.56 xm (stage 6). The periods of August 14 are used for Table 111. (Reproduced with permission from reference 15. Copyright 1988.)... Figure 7. Sulfur size distributions at Grand Canyon National Parky August 1984, The finest aerosols are at the top (stage 8, around 0.1 xm), and the coarsest (8.5 to about 15 xm) are at the bottom. Most sulfur mass occurs between 0.34 and 0.56 xm (stage 6). The periods of August 14 are used for Table 111. (Reproduced with permission from reference 15. Copyright 1988.)...
Dye, J.E., Baumgardner, D., Gandrud, B.M., Kawa, S.R., Kelly, K.K., Loewenstein, M., Ferry, G.V., Chan. K.R., and Gary, B.L. (1992) Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric arid droplets, and implications for cloud fotmation, J. Geophys. Res. 97,8015-8034. [Pg.279]

Incineration can be applied to all contaminants that have high heat content. It eliminates odor and leachate problems, which are usually associated with landfills, but metals can react with other elements in the feed stream, such as chlorine or sulfur, and form more volatile and toxic compounds. The process has high maintenance and operation costs. Straitz et al. (1995) reported that incineration is a reliable, cost-effective approach to treat VOCs and a wide range of objectionable gas. Chaouki et al. (1995) conducted experiments that examined the effect of fluidized bed combustion on the properties and characteristics of a soil contaminated with PCBs. Particle size distribution and PCB contents were determined before and after a 30-minute incineration. The incineration promoted agglomeration soil, increases in soil pH, and decreases in the PCB content to undetectable levels. [Pg.84]

Based on the use of the NARCM regional model of climate and formation of the field of concentration and size distribution of aerosol, Munoz-Alpizar et al. (2003) calculated the transport, diffusion, and deposition of sulfate aerosol using an approximate model of the processes of sulfur oxidation that does not take the chemical processes in urban air into account. However, the 3-D evolution of microphysical and optical characteristics of aerosol was discussed in detail. The results of numerical modeling were compared with observational data near the surface and in the free troposphere carried out on March 2, 4, and 14, 1997. Analysis of the time series of observations at the airport in Mexico City revealed low values of visibility in the morning due to the small thickness of the ABL, and the subsequent improvement of visibility as ABL thickness increased. Estimates of visibility revealed its strong dependence on wind direction and aerosol size distribution. Calculations have shown that increased detail in size distribution presentation promotes a more reliable simulation of the coagulation processes and a more realistic size distribution characterized by the presence of the accumulation mode of aerosol with the size of particles 0.3 pm. In this case, the results of visibility calculations become more reliable, too. [Pg.46]

In semi-batch operation, the SCISR is first filled with a solution of sodium silicate with certain concentration, and then a sulfuric acid solution of a given concentration is dripped at a certain rate into the reactor to react with the sodium silicate at a controlled temperature. The reaction continues for a certain interval of time after the dripping has finished. Stirring is then stopped for ageing of the precipitate for a term, and then the precipitate is sampled and the sample is measured with a laser particle-measuring instrument of FAM type to obtain the sizes and size distribution of the particles in the wet product. [Pg.274]

Determination of the time dependence of particle size distribution and number concentration in a growing system has been evaluated on the well-known LaMer sulfur sols (18, 19, 9), an extensively studied system (5). [Pg.106]

Samples of raw and cleaned coals produced at the Ames Laboratory and obtained from TRW have been characterized for the mineral matter content and distribution among various particle sizes. The sulfur forms before and after treatment have been determined by conventional ASTM techniques and a direct SEM method. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Sulfur size distribution is mentioned: [Pg.340]    [Pg.1058]    [Pg.498]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.923]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.245]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 , Pg.383 ]




SEARCH



Sulfur distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info