Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Shear stress relaxation function

The transition strongly affects the molecular mobility, which leads to large changes in rheology. For a direct observation of the relaxation pattern, one may, for instance, impose a small step shear strain y0 on samples near LST while measuring the shear stress response T12(t) as a function of time. The result is the shear stress relaxation function G(t) = T12(t)/ < >, also called relaxation modulus. Since the concept of a relaxation modulus applies to liquids as well as to solids, it is well suited for describing the LST. [Pg.172]

Figure 1 The shear stress relaxation function, C(t), obtained from a molecular dynamics simulation of500 SRP spheres at a reduced temperature of 1.0 and effective volume fraction of 0.45. Note that n = 144 and 1152 (from Equation (1)) cases are superimposable with the analytic function of Equation (4) ( Algebraic on the figure) for short times, t (or nt here)... Figure 1 The shear stress relaxation function, C(t), obtained from a molecular dynamics simulation of500 SRP spheres at a reduced temperature of 1.0 and effective volume fraction of 0.45. Note that n = 144 and 1152 (from Equation (1)) cases are superimposable with the analytic function of Equation (4) ( Algebraic on the figure) for short times, t (or nt here)...
The rheology of many of the systems displayed gel-like viscoelastic features, especially for the long-range attractive interaction potentials, which manifested a non-zero plateau in the shear stress relaxation function, C/t), the so-called equilibrium modulus, which has been considered to be a useful indicator of the presence of a gel. The infinite frequency shear rigidity modulus, was extremely sensitive to the form of the potential. Despite being the most short-... [Pg.34]

Figure 5 Time evolution of the shear stress relaxation function, C t), for the 36 18 potential at 4> = 0.2 and T = 0.3. The waiting times are = 3 and 162 for the two curves... Figure 5 Time evolution of the shear stress relaxation function, C t), for the 36 18 potential at 4> = 0.2 and T = 0.3. The waiting times are = 3 and 162 for the two curves...
Fig. 14. The strain dependent part of the shear stress relaxation function for different values of the tube constraint parameter z... Fig. 14. The strain dependent part of the shear stress relaxation function for different values of the tube constraint parameter z...
The classical viscoelastic properties are the dynamic shear moduli, written in the frequency domain as the storage modulus G ( y) and the loss modulus G a>), the shear stress relaxation function G t), and the shear-dependent viscosity j (k). Optical flow birefringence and analogous methods determine related solution properties. Nonlinear viscoelastic phenomena are treated briefly in Chapter 14. [Pg.397]

The Kronig(47)-Kramers(48) relations arise mathematically from two considerations, the first being that fluid behavior is in the linear-response regime, and the second being that causality is satisfied. By linear response it is meant that the response of a fluid to a series of applied forces is the sum of the distinct responses that would have been created by applying separately each force in the series. The causality requirement mandates that the shear stress relaxation function G(t), which describes the shear stress required to maintain constant a shear strain initially imposed at t = 0, must satisfy G(t) = 0 for r < 0. The results of these considerations(47,48) are the Kronig-Kramers relations, which may be written... [Pg.435]

This is the fundamental differential equation for a shear stress relaxation experiment. The solution to this differential equation is an equation which gives a as a function of time in accord with experiment. [Pg.160]

The shear stress relaxation modulus of the fluid, G(t), is a monotonically decreasing function of time, with G(oo) = 0. If the fluid initially at rest is given a small shear deformation y0 at t=0, the shear stress at later times becomes simply ... [Pg.22]

Shear deformations. In these tests the Interface Is deformed in shear to a certain extent or at a certain rate and the shear stress required is measured as a function of the shear strain and/or time. The interfacial shear modulus G or the Interfaclal shear viscosity t]° cem be calculated using [3.6.17] or [3.6.16], respectively. By analogy to the technique described above, stress relaxation experiments can also be carried out from these one Ccm obtain an interfacial shear stress relaxation modulus G ] ) = y(t)/(Ax/Ay). For solld-llke interfacial layers fracture can be studied as a function of time by deforming the interface at various shear rates and measuring the required shear stress as a function of the shear strain. [Pg.309]

The functions of t on the right side of Eq. (17.9) are similar in shape to those given for the shear stress relaxation in Fig. 6. We know of no experimental curves for this type of experiment. [Pg.60]

In the above discussion, six functions Go(w), d(w), G (w), G"(w), /(w), and J"(oj) have been defined in terms of an idealized dynamic testing, while earlier we defined shear stress relaxation modulus G t) (see Equation 3.19) and shear creep compliance J(t) (see Equation 3.21) in terms of an idealized stress relaxation experiment and an idealized creep test, respectively. Mathematical relationships relating any one of these eight functions to any other can be derived. Such relationships for interconversion of viscoelastic function are described by Ferry [5], and interested readers are referred to this treatise for the same. [Pg.309]

Figure 2. Stress relaxation function for a 4% solution of polystyrene (m.w. = 1.8 x 10 ) at different shear rates (from top to bottom, 0.528, 1.67, 5.28 and 16.7 sec ). Solid curves are computed using the same model parameters as in Figure 1. Symbols are experimental data (2,6,7). Figure 2. Stress relaxation function for a 4% solution of polystyrene (m.w. = 1.8 x 10 ) at different shear rates (from top to bottom, 0.528, 1.67, 5.28 and 16.7 sec ). Solid curves are computed using the same model parameters as in Figure 1. Symbols are experimental data (2,6,7).
The notation used to describe the contacts is shown in Figure 1. P t) is the time dependent applied load, S P,t) the deformation, a(P,t) the contact radius, and R and Ri the radii of curvature of the two bodies at the point of contact. We consider only flat substrates so that R R and R2 = >. Each elastic material is described by its Young modulus E, Poisson ratio v, and is assumed to be isotopic so that the shear modulus is G = Ejl + v). Viscoelastic materials are assumed to be linear with stress relaxation functions E t) and creep compliance functions J t), All properties are assumed to be independent of depth. [Pg.67]

Zero-shear-rate viscosity is equal to the integral of the stress relaxation function ... [Pg.465]

MD simulation can gain insight into the viscoelastic behavior of nanopartide-polymer composites. The shear stress relaxation modulus can be calculated using the time autocorrelation function of the stress tensor, while the viscosity is calculated based on the Einstein relations. Compared to conventional composites, the viscoelastic properties are strongly perturbed by the nanopartides and depend upon the nature of nanopartide-polymer interactions. The viscosity and dynamic shear modulus can be dramatically increased for composites with attractive... [Pg.70]

The shear stress-relaxation modulus (memory function) for a Maxwell element is... [Pg.301]

We indicate the dependence on the independent variable, shear rate, in order to avoid confusion with the functions used to describe stress relaxation functions, which are functions of time and strain. The DE model predicts that P(x) is a universal function of (x d) for all entangled polymers [88, p. 44]. The predicted limiting zero-shear rate values are 2/7 or 0.29 (DE-IA)... [Pg.367]

In an ideal fluid, the stresses are isotropic. There is no strength, so there are no shear stresses the normal stress and lateral stresses are equal and are identical to the pressure. On the other hand, a solid with strength can support shear stresses. However, when the applied stress greatly exceeds the yield stress of a solid, its behavior can be approximated by that of a fluid because the fractional deviations from stress isotropy are small. Under these conditions, the solid is considered to be hydrodynamic. In the absence of rate-dependent behavior such as viscous relaxation or heat conduction, the equation of state of an isotropic fluid or hydrodynamic solid can be expressed in terms of specific internal energy as a function of pressure and specific volume E(P, V). A familiar equation of state is that for an ideal gas... [Pg.15]

Cheremisinoff and Davis (1979) relaxed these two assumptions by using a correlation developed by Cohen and Hanratty (1968) for the interfacial shear stress, using von Karman s and Deissler s eddy viscosity expressions for solving the liquid-phase momentum equations while still using the hydraulic diameter concept for the gas phase. They assumed, however, that the velocity profile is a function only of the radius, r, or the normal distance from the wall, y, and that the shear stress is constant, t = tw. ... [Pg.213]

In a further development of the continuous chain model it has been shown that the viscoelastic and plastic behaviour, as manifested by the yielding phenomenon, creep and stress relaxation, can be satisfactorily described by the Eyring reduced time (ERT) model [10]. Creep in polymer fibres is brought about by the time-dependent shear deformation, resulting in a mutual displacement of adjacent chains [7-10]. As will be shown in Sect. 4, this process can be described by activated shear transitions with a distribution of activation energies. The ERT model will be used to derive the relationship that describes the strength of a polymer fibre as a function of the time and the temperature. [Pg.22]

Now if we divide the shear stress in Equation (4.13) by the applied strain we obtain an expression in the form of a shear modulus. This term G(t) is described as the relaxation function ... [Pg.106]


See other pages where Shear stress relaxation function is mentioned: [Pg.181]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.2371]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.2371]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.9150]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.1444]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.219]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Shear function

Stresses shear stress

© 2024 chempedia.info