Separation techniques molecular size

As with other size-exclusion techniques, the pore size of the selected Zorbax GF column should provide resolution over the molecular size range of the proteins that are to be separated. The Zorbax GF-250 column separates proteins in the range of 4000 to 400,000 Da. The Zorbax GF-450 provides separation over the range of 10,000 to 1,000,000 Da. When these two columns are coupled, they can be used to separate proteins with molecular weights of 4000 to 1,000,000. 

Hydrodynamic chromatography (HdC) is a relatively new technique, especially in molecular weight separation. It was first investigated in 1969 by DiMarzio and Guttman (1,2) and was called separation by flow (3,4). Small started calling it hydrodynamic chromatography in 1974 (5). The application of this technique was first concerned with the separation of particle size. Prud homme applied it to the molecular weight separation of macromolecules in 1982 (6). 

Ultrafiltration of micellar solutions combines the high permeate flows commonly found in ultrafiltration systems with the possibility of removing molecules independent of their size, since micelles can specifically solubilize or bind low molecular weight components. Characteristics of this separation technique, known as micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), are that micelles bind specific compounds and subsequent ultrafiltration separates the surrounding aqueous phase from the micelles [70]. The pore size of the UF membrane must be chosen such, that the micelles are retained but the unbound components can pass the membrane freely. Alternatively, proteins such as BSA have been used in stead of micelles to obtain similar enan-tioselective aggregates [71]. 

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has several unique advantages compared to HPLC, snch as higher efficiency dne to non-parabolic fronting, shorter analytical time, prodnction of no or much smaller amounts of organic solvents, and lower cost for capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and fused-silica capillary techniques. However, in CZE, the most popular separation mode for CE, the analytes are separated on the basis of differences in charge and molecular sizes, and therefore neutral compounds snch as carotenoids do not migrate and all co-elute with the electro-osmotic flow. 

An important technique for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of different macromolecular materiafs is based on the efectrophoretic separation of particfes having different transport vefocities (e.g., because they have different zeta potentiafs). This technique is used for the anafysis of proteins, pofysaccharides, and other naturally occurring substances whose molecular size approaches that of colloidal particles (for more details, see Section 30.3.4). It is an advantage of the electrophoretic method that mild experimental conditions can be used—dilute solutions with pH values around 7, room temperature, and so on—which are not destructive to the biological macromolecules. 

Until this point, the sample preparation techniques under discussion have relied upon differences in polarity to separate the analyte and the sample matrix in contrast, ultraflltration and on-line dialysis rely upon differences in molecular size between the analyte and matrix components to effect a separation. In ultrafiltration, a centrifugal force is applied across a membrane filter which has a molecular weight cut-off intended to isolate the analyte from larger matrix components. Furusawa incorporated an ultrafiltration step into his separation of sulfadimethoxine from chicken tissue extracts. Some cleanup of the sample extract may be necessary prior to ultrafiltration, or the ultrafiltration membranes can become clogged and ineffective. Also, one must ensure that the choice of membrane filter for ultrafiltration is appropriate in terms of both the molecular weight cut-off and compatibility with the extraction solvent used. 

As has been discussed, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) is a powerful tool for macromolecular separation and characterization. This technique separates macromolecules which vary in effective molecular size, utilizing columns that... 

Apart from paints, electrokinetic separations find limited application for synthetic polymers [905], mainly because of solvent compatibility (CE is mostly an aqueous technique) and competition of SEC (reproducibility). Reasons in favour of the use of CE-like methods for polymer analysis are speed, sample throughput and low solvent consumption. Nevertheless, CE provides some interesting possibilities for polymer separation. Electrokinetic methods have been developed based on differences in ionisation, degree of interaction with solvent constituents, and molecular size and conformation. 

Innovations in separation science continued on this theme and provided one of the most powerful separation techniques used in biochemistry, where proteins are separated with isoelectric focusing (IEF) applied in one direction, and gel electrophoresis (GE) applied at aright angle to the first separation direction (O Farrell, 1975 Celis and Bravo, 1984). In this case, proteins are first separated according to their isoelectric point, measured in p/units, and then according to their molecular weight by gel electrophoresis. The size separation step is usually aided by addition of a surfactant, most typically sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and the gel material is a polyacrylamide formulation. 

---