Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Separation methods for characterization

New Separation Methods for Characterizing the Size of Silica Sols... [Pg.279]

The characterization of colloidal silica has been the subject of numerous studies involving both physical and chemical methods. Her [1] summarized many of the available methods, with particular emphasis on chemical approaches. Other more recent reviews [2-4] featured instrumental methods that are useful for characterizing silica sols and other colloids. This chapter describes some of the relatively new separations methods for characterizing silica sols. The merits and limitations of these methods are summarized so that the potential user can critically evaluate the capability of each approach for a projected application. [Pg.537]

Host stabilizers are relatively nonvolatile so they do not vaporize during a thermal curing process. Unfortunately, their low volatility make GC analysis impossible for many stabilizers. HPLC works well for the UVA, but HALS are not easily detected by conventional UV or fluorescent detectors. High resolution capillary SFC was shown to be an ideal separation method for twenty-one polymer additives (17). We chose SFC to characterize stabilizers contained in automotive coatings. [Pg.301]

A number of multidimensional analyses have been developed that provide powerful methods for characterizing these polymers. Linking a liquid chromatogram to a pyrolysis gas chromatograph [l 9] can determine the breadth of the composition distribution, as the method fractionates the SAN copolymer before pyrolysis. This information is useful for determining the source of variation in SAN copolymer properties. Composition drift towards high acrylonitrile-containing fractions can lead to undesirable yellow color, and excessively broad composition drift can cause opacity and brittleness in the material due to phase separation... [Pg.286]

If we define in that way the phenomena taking place on the molecular sieves surface, the first step to characterize the type of separation mechanism of a specific gas mixture should be determination of the pore sizes. However, selection of the measurement method for characterization of porous structures also has to take into account these mechanisms. [Pg.226]

This is an effective and relatively simple method for characterizing silica sols and other colloids [75]. It has also been used to determine the particle size distributions of polymer lattices [76,77]. Separations are performed in a column packed with particles having pores substantially of the same size. A carrier liquid is passed through the column as a mixture of colloidal particles passes through the bed, the larger ones exit first since they are too large to sample the pore volume. Intermediate sized colloids enter the pores and are retained according to the volume that can be... [Pg.276]

This book covers some of the significant advances in hyphenated chromatographic separation methods for polymer characterization. Chromatographic separation techniques in this volume include size-exclusion chromatography, liquid chromatography, and field flow fractionation methods that are used in conjunction with information-rich detectors such as molecular size-sensitive or compositional-sensitive detectors or coupled in cross-fractionation modes. [Pg.3]

We hope this book will encourage and catalyze additional activity and method development in hyphenated chromatographic separation methods for polymer characterization. [Pg.4]

Hydroxy groups of cyclodextrins can be regioselectively alkylated in positions 2 and 6 of the glucose residues due to the high reactivity of these hydroxy groups. The 3-positions are much less reactive and can be alkylated or acylated under more drastic conditions. The preparation of pure per-O-alkylated cyclodextrin derivatives, which are mainly used for the separation of unpolar compounds (alkanes, alkenes, spiroacetals, alkyl halides, etc.) as well as a method for characterization of these phases have been described in detail (29). [Pg.112]

CE techniques have great advantages over conventional chromatographic methods for characterization of polyelectrolytes, because in the pure aqueous system unwanted interactions with a stationary phase are excluded. However, strongly basic polyelectrolytes may adhere to the capillary surface, leading to peak distortion. In this case similar precautions have to be taken as in the separation of proteins and DNA, i.e. use of hydrophilically coated capillaries. [Pg.217]

Starting with the basic concept of the electrokinetic potential of colloidal particles, the so-called zeta potential, i.e., the electrokinetic potential at the shear plane, the most important well-established methods of zeta potential determination are discussed separately. Taking into account the peculiarities of kaolin particles, the relevance of these methods for characterizing kaolin particles in the absence and the presence of polyelectrolytes are outlined here. Thereby a mixed stabilization by oppositely charged polyelectrolytes is discussed in more detail. [Pg.567]

Accordingly, we recommend that advanced methods for characterizing interfacial structure and dynamics be developed vigorously. A panel was established by the committee to study and make recommendations on experimental methods. Its findings have been issued separately (NMAB 438-3, In Situ Characterization of Electrochemical Processes ), and its conclusions and recommendations are summarized in Chapter 6. Twelve specific recommendations are set forth for special emphasis in the near term. They call, in general, for new methods that (a) can characterize interfacial structure with greater chemical detail and with spatial resolution approaching the atomic scale and (b) can characterize dynamics in ways that will provide views of faster reactions. It is particularly important to establish new methods for in situ characterization—that is, direct observation in the electrochemical environment of interest. [Pg.21]

However, it seems that the use of the combined electrochemical pre-chamber/UHV main chamber device seems to be the best for these treatments. One of the methods consists of applying the same treatment to platinum single crystals for separate experiments. For characterization, low-energy electron diffraction, Auger electron spectroscopy, or XPS was used. Conventional electrochemical experiments were followed with the analysis of the results by taking into account the effect of the unavoidable differences in the required conditions. [Pg.237]

It has been suggested that it is easier to make a new molecule than to discover exactly what it is you ve made. In synthesis, the difficulty usually lies not in the execution, but in the separation, isolation and identification of products. This is particularly so with metal complexes, where the often large array of options for products, and their capacity to sometimes undergo further reactions in the process of separation, makes life difficult for coordination chemists. Further, species that exist as dominant components in solution may not be the same as the dominant species isolated in the solid state. All this means that defining molecular structure in both solution and the solid state requires a call on a wide range of physical methods for characterization. [Pg.209]

While the methods for characterizing celluloses on the basis of their accessibility have been useful, they do not provide a basis for understanding the level of structure at which the response of a particular cellulose is determined. This follows from the ratlier simple categorization of the substrate cellulose into ordered and disordered fractions corresponding to the fractions that are thought to be crystalline and those that are not. This classification does not allow discrimination between effects that have their origin at the level of secondary structure and those that arise from the nature of the tertiary structure. Thus, in terms of chemical reactions, this approach does not facilitate separation of steric effects that follow from the conformation of the molecule as it is approached by a reacting species, from the effects of accessibility, which is inherently a consequence of the tertiary structure. [Pg.518]

Gel permeation chromatography/size exclusion chromatography (GPC/SEC) is probably the most widely used method for characterization of HS. Its principle merits and limits have been well reviewed by many authors. Here, we first briefly summarize these principle, merits, hmits, and most importantly, solutions then we focus on its applications for HS separation and characterization when coupled with other analytical methods, and discuss some recent results based on these new applications. [Pg.1159]

The participants in this symposium addressed many of these problems. Methods for characterizing size and chemical composition by size were discussed, and several models of metal and virus adsorption were presented. Modeling particulate dynamics in rivers and the ocean provided new insights into the fate of contaminants associated with particulates. Papers on applications of size distribution measurements for selection, process modeling, and control of solid/liquid separation processes demonstrated the analytical value of particle counting compared to cumulative measurements of particulate concentration. [Pg.410]

Gas adsorption is an important method for characterization of nanoporous carbons because it allows for evaluation of the specific surface area, pore volume, pore size, pore size distribution and surface properties of these materials [1, 10-12]. Although various techniques for measurement of gas adsorption data and methods of their analysis pear to be well established, an accurate and reliable evaluation of adsorption properties is still a difficult task. This can be attributed to the inherent features of many porous carbonaceous materials, namely, to their strong surface and structural heterogeneity. The effects of structural and surface heterogeneity in adsorption on nanoporous carbons are often difficult to separate. [Pg.110]


See other pages where Separation methods for characterization is mentioned: [Pg.324]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.1718]    [Pg.282]   


SEARCH



Characterization methods

Separation methods

Separation methods for

Separative methods

© 2024 chempedia.info