Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Semi-fluidized particles

In a commercial fluidized bed, the presence of defluldized or semi-fluidized particles on the distributor in-between the gas inlet points is very undesirable since with "sticky" or "tacky" materials, these zones will grow and eventually plug the distributor. With exothermic catalytic reactions, these defluldized zones would lead to the formation of hot spots on the distributor. Fakhlml [60] developed a model which predicts the formation of defluldized zones and Zenz [22] suggested a distributor made of a honeycomb of nearly touching cones or hexagons to eliminate these stagnant zones. [Pg.341]

Thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl. Very finely divided red iron oxide is obtained by atomizing iron pentacarbonyl, Fe(CO)5, and burning it in excess of air. The size of the particles depends on the temperature (580-800 °C) and the residence time in the reactor. The smallest particles are transparent and consist of 2-line ferri-hydrite, whereas the larger, semi-transparent particles consist of hematite (see Chap. 19). The only byproduct of the reaction is carbon dioxide, hence, the process has no undesirable environmental side effects. Magnetite can be produced by the same process if it is carried out at 100-400 °C. Thermal decomposition of iron pentacarbonyl is also used to coat aluminium powder (in a fluidized bed) and also mica platelets with iron oxides to produce interference or nacreous pigments. [Pg.529]

The following semi-empirical equation relates the (hindered) settling velocity of a slurry of particles to the settling velocity of a single particle, known as the Richardson and Zaki (1954) (RZ) equation. The RZ equation is also used for liquid fluidization whereby particles are supported by an up-flow of fluid. [Pg.32]

Due to the fact that protein adsorption in fluidized beds is accomplished by binding of macromolecules to the internal surface of porous particles, the primary mass transport limitations found in packed beds of porous matrices remain valid. Protein transport takes place from the bulk fluid to the outer adsorbent surface commonly described by a film diffusion model, and within the pores to the internal surface known as pore diffusion. The diffusion coefficient D of proteins may be estimated by the semi-empirical correlation of Poison [65] from the absolute temperature T, the solution viscosity rj, and the molecular weight of the protein MA as denoted in Eq. (16). [Pg.211]

A major factor in fluidized bed behavior is the interaction between the gas flow from individual orifices and the particle and gas mixture within the bed. The jet penetration and the subsequent bubble formation have an important influence upon solids and gas mixing and, ultimately, upon the usefulness of the bed for reactor purposes. While flow visualization data are available at ambient pressures and temperatures, the natures of jet penetration and bubble development at high pressures and temperatures are not easily measured. Typical data on bubble size and bubble velocity at ambient conditions are shown, represented by the small size symbols, in Figure 2. It is well known that bubble volume can be correlated as a function of gas volumetric flow rate ( ) and that bubble velocity is related to the size of the bubble radius ( ). Such semi-empirical correlations are indicated as solid lines in that figure. [Pg.165]

Recently, Pallares and Johnsson [106] presented an overview of the macroscopic semi-empirical models used for the description of the fluid dynamics of circulating fluidized bed combustion units. They summarized the basic modeling concepts and assumptions made for each model together with the major advantages and drawbacks. In order to make a structured analysis of the processes involved, the CFBC unit is often divided into 6 fluid dynamical zones like the bottom bed, freeboard, exit zone, exit duct, cyclone and downcomer and particle seal, which have been shown to exhibit different fluid dynamical behavior. [Pg.888]

In Chapter 2 we discussed a number of studies with three-phase catalytic membrane reactors. In these reactors the catalyst is impregnated within the membrane, which serves as a contactor between the gas phase (B) and liquid phase reactants (A), and the catalyst that resides within the membrane pores. When gas/liquid reactions occur in conventional (packed, -trickle or fluidized-bed) multiphase catalytic reactors the solid catalyst is wetted by a liquid film as a result, the gas, before reaching the catalyst particle surface or pore, has to diffuse through the liquid layer, which acts as an additional mass transfer resistance between the gas and the solid. In the case of a catalytic membrane reactor, as shown schematically in Fig. 5.16, the active membrane pores are filled simultaneously with the liquid and gas reactants, ensuring an effective contact between the three phases (gas/ liquid, and catalyst). One of the earliest studies of this type of reactor was reported by Akyurtlu et al [5.58], who developed a semi-analytical model coupling analytical results with a numerical solution for this type of reactor. Harold and coworkers (Harold and Ng... [Pg.198]

The multi-fluid models discussed in Chap. 3 have been employed extensively describing the behavior of cold flow and reactive flow systems in multiphase reactors. However, for gas-solid fluidized bed systems, and in particular for dense systems, it has been found that the dispersed phase behavior cannot be captured without an extended description of the pressure tensor closure. The first extensions of the dilute continuum mechanical two-fluid model concept included a very rough approximation of the solid phase collisional pressure in terms of a semi-empirical correlation for the modulus of elasticity and a constant representative particle fluid viscosity. This type... [Pg.583]

The assumption of instantaneous momentum exchange brings forward an important limitation of the DSMC approach the real duration of a particle-particle collision must be small relative to the mean free time between two consecutive collisions. Therefore, the method should not be applied to very dense systems in which prolonged particle—particle contacts take place such as in hopper flows or dead zones in fluidized systems. On the other hand, the method is extremely efficient for dilute and semi-dilute systems such as pneumatically conveyed powders, riser flows, and liquid sprays. [Pg.156]


See other pages where Semi-fluidized particles is mentioned: [Pg.555]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.1024]    [Pg.1324]    [Pg.318]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.341 ]




SEARCH



Particle fluidization

Semi-fluidization

© 2024 chempedia.info