Self-consistent field ground-state wave

A detailed analysis of the UV-VIS spectrum of (spinach) plasto-cyanin in the Cu(II) state has been reported (56). A Gaussian resolution of bands at 427, 468, 535, 599, 717, 781, and 926 nm is indicated in Fig. 7. Detailed assignments have been made from low-temperature optical absorption and magnetic circular dichroic (MCD) and CD spectra in conjunction with self-consistent field Xa-scattered wave calculations. The intense blue band at 600 nm is due to the S(Cys) pvr transition, which is intense because of the very good overlap between ground- and excited-state wave functions. Other transitions which are observed implicate, for example, the Met (427 nm) and His (468 nm) residues. These bonds are much less intense. The low energy of the d 2 orbital indicates a reasonable interaction between the Cu and S(Met), even at 2.9 A. It is concluded that the S(Cys)—Cu(II) bond makes a dominant contribution to the electronic structure of the active site, which is strongly influenced by the orientation of this residue by the... 

It is possible to divide electron correlation as dynamic and nondynamic correlations. Dynamic correlation is associated with instant correlation between electrons occupying the same spatial orbitals and the nondynamic correlation is associated with the electrons avoiding each other by occupying different spatial orbitals. Thus, the ground state electronic wave function cannot be described with a single Slater determinant (Figure 3.3) and multiconfiguration self-consistent field (MCSCF) procedures are necessary to include dynamic electron correlation. 

Most numerical methods for calculating molecular hyperpolarizability use sum over states expressions in either a time-dependent (explicitly including field dependent dispersion terms) or time-independent perturbation theory framework [13,14]. Sum over states methods require an ability to determine the excited states of the system reliably. This can become computationally demanding, especially for high order hyperpolarizabilities [15]. An alternative strategy adds a finite electric field term to the hamiltonian and computes the hyperpolarizability from the derivatives of the field dependent molecular dipole moment. Finite-field calculations use the ground state wave function only and include the influence of the field in a self-consistent manner [16]. 

Analytic, exact solutions cannot be obtained except for the simplest systems, i.e. hydrogen-like atoms with just one electron and one nucleus. Good approximate solutions can be found by means of the self-consistent field (SCF) method, the details of which need not concern us. If all the electrons have been explicitly considered in the Hamiltonian, the wave functions V, will be many-electron functions V, will contain the coordinates of all the electrons, and a complete electron density map can be obtained by plotting Vf. The associated energies E, are the energy states of the molecule (see Section 2.6) the lowest will be the ground state , and the calculated energy differences En — El should match the spectroscopic transitions in the electronic spectrum. 

Calculations by the self-consistent field LCAO-MO method for the ground state wave function of the pyrazine molecule indicate that the lone pairs are quite different. The lower lone pair is little delocalized (1.88 electrons on nitrogen), but the second lone pair is as delocalized as the lone pair in pyridine with 1.37 electrons on nitrogen, 0.22 electrons on hydrogen, and 0.40 electrons on carbon.63... 

The MC SCF method usually takes into account a minimum number of configurations capable of assuring some fundamental requirements, this step being followed by the optimization of the basis functions using the self-consistent-field method. For example, in order to describe accurately the dissociation of ground-state H2 it is only necessary to consider the two-configuration wave function... 

Predictions can be made about the suitability of different system trajectories on the basis of orbital symmetry conservation rules (207). The most suitable trajectory is an approximation to the reaction path of the reaction under study. The rules can also yield information about the possible structure of the activated complex. The correlation diagram technique has been improved in a series of books by Epiotis et al. (214-216). The method is based on self-consistent field-configuration interaction or valence bond (SCF-CI or VB) (including ionic structures) wave functions. Applications on reactions in the ground states as well as in the excited electronic states are impressive however, the price to be paid for the predictions seems to be rather high. 

In calculating a theoretical photoelectron spectmm, the atomic ionization cross section a. is usually taken so far from the theoretical values calculated for a neutral free atom in the ground state. However, the MO calculation by DV-Xa method is carried out self consistently and provides Q. by Mulliken population analysis using the SCF MO wave function calculated. In the present calculations, the atomic orbital Xj used for the basis function flexibly expands or contracts according to reorganization of the charge density on the atom in molecule in the self-consistent field. Furthermore, excited state atomic orbitals are sometimes added to extend the basis set. In such a case, the estimation of peak intensity of the photoionization using the data of Oj previously published is not adequate. Thus a calculation of the photoionization cross section is required for the atomic orbital used in the SCF calculation in order... 

The estimates for Sfj cited above were all for thermal ground-state systems, based on self-consistent field (SCF) wavefunctions. Studies with more elaborate wave-function models have provided examples where electron-correlation effects (relative to the mean-field SCF level) make appreciable contributions to T,y magnitudes (e.g., [110, 116]). Furthermore, for the important case of excited state ET processes, where the SCF approach is not generally applicable, the viability of a one-particle model for T// becomes less clear. 

Hyperfine couplings, in particular the isotropic part which measures the spin density at the nuclei, puts special demands on spin-restricted wave-functions. For example, complete active space (CAS) approaches are designed for a correlated treatment of the valence orbitals, while the core orbitals are doubly occupied. This leaves little flexibility in the wave function for calculating properties of this kind that depend on the spin polarization near the nucleus. This is equally true for self-consistent field methods, like restricted open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF) or Kohn-Sham (ROKS) methods. On the other hand, unrestricted methods introduce spin contamination in the reference (ground) state resulting in overestimation of the spin-polarization. 

---